N
Neoplatonist
Guest
That only makes sense IF the child could learn from the mistake and become a better person before dire consequences set in. If your 7-year-old was running for the edge of the cliff, how loving is patience then? What if your 12-year-old is shooting heroine (which doesn’t even ruin them for all eternity)?A mother who knows that suffering the consequences of ones choices is more loving that interfering.
Similarly, would a teacher who never answers student questions or frustrations be a “better” or “more loving” teacher? Would a mother who doesn’t answer back to a child lost in the middle of the mall show a higher form of love than one who comes over and picks her up? Even if the child has done this before? (She’s 4, of course she’s a slow learner.)
Should the heroine kid know better? Sure. Did you tell him a bunch of times? Sure. Did you give him a cool book to read about living healthy and avoiding the dangers of heroine? Sure.
So? Why would a teacher with infinite time and resources not go back and re-teach the lesson as many times in as many ways as it takes to help the kid past the sticking point? Because the kid is stubborn? Baloney. Because the kid is a bad listener? Again, no.