So, you have no explanation for the origin of amino acids. Science does have an explanation for the origin of amino acids, and has repeatedly supported that explanation in experiments.
Because that sorting did not happen everywhere, only in some places.
I have a detailed explanation of course but the OP is about life which you’ve admitted to not having an explanation of.
Any evidence?
Yes. Read the Noorduin paper and see under what conditions the experiment was performed. Anywhere those conditions did not apply will not have had the sorting process.
The experiment fails just like Miller-Uray experiment failed. Nature doesn’t sort because it doesn’t know or care.
So, you do not accept science. Fine. You cannot even been bothered to spell Miller-Urey correctly.
I accept any reasonable explanation from all disciplines and faiths even Buddhism.
Abiogenesis is still a work in progress. Evolution has been observed, and rejecting it puts you in the same category as Flat Earthers and the 6,000 year old earth YECs.
No such thing as work in progress, we either know or we don’t. Work in progress is an admission that you don’t know which should come out clearly, why are you afraid of saying it?
Nope. Speciation through mutations and natural selection has not been observed nor demonstrated.
Speciation has been observed for the last 115 years, ever since de Vries (1905). Your sources are lying to your again. Merely repeating their lies do not make them true.
I think you mean ‘species have been observed since…’, speciation through mutations is an imagination so far. The idea has been proven to be false, not workable.
You think wrongly. Speciation has been observed. Your unwillingness to accept what you do not want to see is very obvious. Your personal opinion does not affect scientific reality.
It is simply amazing how strongly some people want to deny reality.
But then again, if reality contradicts their belief, it is just too bad for reality. 
It would be good if you expound. Thanks.
I have already expounded on this thread. You have ignored my exposition once. Why should I waste my time repeating it?
Just what i thought, speciation through artificial selection and human interference, not the small incremental variations caused by mutations, aided by natural selection which is the hallmark of evolution. Non gives examples of how the mutation was beneficial at each step and how the environment aided the speciation at each step.
Another obvious error. Mutations may be beneficial or neutral during speciation. See Kimura (1968).
I started this thread by asking how could the universe and life come into existence without God. After a thousand replies, I don’t think science has convincing evidence to show this.
but I … don’t think you can do it. < He said to no one in particular.I’ll do my best to demonstrate. First I’ll need you to find some nothing(s) for us to do some experiments on. Kindly update me when you have the nothing(s).