D
djrakowski
Guest
:yup: You’ve just described me in the latter part of my evangelical days.I think this may be the nub of why folks who hew to OSAS are paradoxically some very white knuckle Christians sometimes.
:yup: You’ve just described me in the latter part of my evangelical days.I think this may be the nub of why folks who hew to OSAS are paradoxically some very white knuckle Christians sometimes.
My wife as well. She really struggled because she’s naturally scrupulous, so any little fault would have her questioning her salvation. She would often be crying on the way home from our attending a Pentecostal service, this despite being a veritable saint, being in the choir, going to 4 services a week, praying constantly, reading the Bible, etc.:yup: You’ve just described me in the latter part of my evangelical days.
:clapping: Very nicely written, heisenburg!i am a little perplexed…
Great, so accepting jesus as your personal lord and savior isnt explicitly mentioned in that way in the bible…
But does any Catholic Deny that we have to accept him at a level that is more than just intellectual?
Am I Catholic?
Absolutely…
DO I have a problem when someone asks me if I have accepted him as my personal lord and savior?
Absolutely not…
Perhaps you’ve hit upon part of the problem in the difference in types of language used by evangelicals as compared to Catholics. Have you noticed how evangelicals use the terms ‘my Lord’ and ‘my Personal Lord and Savior,’ while Catholics are more likely to speak of ‘Our Lord?’ Our language tends to emphasize the salvation offered to all mankind by Our Lord, and theirs tends to emphasize the salvation offered to each individual. Neither is particularly right or wrong, but rather points to a difference in emphasis that may be leading to some degree of confusion between us.Absolutely. Jesus Christ is my personal savior. He is also the savior of the world.
I have a personal relationship with him, through prayer, and through the Eucharist. This relationship is possible through the sacraments he instituted on our behalf, beginning with baptism, proceeding with confirmation, with penance, right on through Last Rites.
I have been born again in Christ, and I am a Catholic.
Heisenburg,i am a little perplexed…
Great, so accepting jesus as your personal lord and savior isnt explicitly mentioned in that way in the bible…
But does any Catholic Deny that we have to accept him at a level that is more than just intellectual?
Am I Catholic?
Absolutely…
DO I have a problem when someone asks me if I have accepted him as my personal lord and savior?
Absolutely not…
I think where we as catholics part from some of our protestant brethren is when they say this is all you have to do… We say great, you believe in Christ Jesus, Follow him… do the works the God created us for, just keep in mind the works are for the Lord and not for us lest we boast.
Works do not come from a saving faith, almost like we are forced to do them, We still have to choose to do them… Our faith in the Trinity and his saving blood inspire us to do these works… Not because we are forced, but because we understand that this is what we are suppose to do. Works are simply one of many outward signs of someone who has ‘accepted him as his personal lord and Saviour’
As a note… Catholics Accept the Lord on the most personal level possible every Mass…Not just in some hi in the sky way that people ‘feel’, but physically, in the Eucharist
That being said…
Emotions do play a much larger role in protestant, and more so in fundi churches. If you don’t ‘feel’ it, it isn’t real… I don’t think protestants take it to the level some catholics think they do, but protestants cannot be honest and say that they do not preach a you have to feel it inside message. (again though, this is far more common in the lower churches. I listen to protestant radio stations daily… and daily i hear a different radio preacher talk about how we will ‘feel’ when we are saved.
To which i say…
Remember, even the bible says that the heart (ergo emotions) is the seed of deceit…
In Christ
No its not, Our Lord can open every door in our Life except the one to Him that is for us to “knock” on.That’s on awful lot of emphasis on salvation being in OUR hands, not God’s!
I wonder if Tef was referring to the irony of faith-only Christians claiming that a work - that of accepting Christ as personal Lord and Savior (not merely with words, as Simon was correct to point out in a previous post, but by also handing over your life to Him) - is necessary for salvation.No its not, Our Lord can open every door in our Life except the one to Him that is for us to “knock” on.
I agree that people go to ridiculous lengths to make our point which is simply, Salvation is by the work of Christ on the cross and our faith is what is sufficient to bring us into Christ family, and we are born again when we’ve actually actually accepted that fact and Jesus became the LORD of our lives.I wonder if Tef was referring to the irony of faith-only Christians claiming that a work - that of accepting Christ as personal Lord and Savior (not merely with words, as Simon was correct to point out in a previous post, but by also handing over your life to Him) - is necessary for salvation.
That was precisely my point. By emphasizing what we must do to be saved, it’s easy to forget it is God performing the active role.I wonder if Tef was referring to the irony of faith-only Christians claiming that a work - that of accepting Christ as personal Lord and Savior (not merely with words, as Simon was correct to point out in a previous post, but by also handing over your life to Him) - is necessary for salvation.
Which does bring up an interesting question:I agree that people go to ridiculous lengths to make our point which is simply, Salvation is by the work of Christ on the cross and our faith is what is sufficient to bring us into Christ family, and we are born again when we’ve actually actually accepted that fact and Jesus became the LORD of our lives.
Not a thing i disagree withIt’s not a feeling…its a KNOWledge! and NO evangelic church that I’ve gone to preaches anything about said “feeling”.
NOW mind you that may be true in the far charismatic pentecostal I can not speak for them! always remember Satan can duplicate emotions and or pious feelings…He can’t duplicate the fruit of the spirit!
i do not know, do you?Which does bring up an interesting question:
Can we be saved against our will?
My own opinion is that God can do anything, but God gives us free will and does not often overrule it.i do not know, do you?
Yes, Jesus saved us. What I said was, I wonder if anyone can quote any pre-reformation Christian as saying that they “accepted Jesus as personal Savior.” This quotation from Polycarp isn’t even close.Polycarp said: "Eighty-six years I have served him, and he never did me any wrong. How can I blaspheme my King who saved me?"
Tell me aside from semantics what’s the difference?
To some extent that would be a very alien thought process for the ECFs. After all, they didn’t have modern Western notions of the primacy of the individual.Yes, Jesus saved us. What I said was, I wonder if anyone can quote any pre-reformation Christian as saying that they “accepted Jesus as personal Savior.” This quotation from Polycarp isn’t even close.
And since Polycarp was 86 years old at the time, I guess he was baptized as an infant.Polycarp said: "Eighty-six years I have served him, and he never did me any wrong. How can I blaspheme my King who saved me?"
Tell me aside from semantics what’s the difference?