S
SonofMonica
Guest
Deceivâst thou me, mine eye? 1beleevr, you may be hanging out on Catholic Answers Forums too much. Now youâre talking to the dead!Thank you Judas for playing your role to a tee!![]()
:console:
Deceivâst thou me, mine eye? 1beleevr, you may be hanging out on Catholic Answers Forums too much. Now youâre talking to the dead!Thank you Judas for playing your role to a tee!![]()
You will discover upon reading what is written that a great number of those whom God used did so out of their consent.For example reread the gospel according to St.Luke. Pay very close attention to 1:38 and carefully note verses 41-43 side note on verse 44 a babe in the womb leapin( never knew that the unborn could know God was near.) You should be getting the hint now that Blessed Mary did knowâŚ
God did not use Judas as person but God used Judasâs actionsâŚGod used the Blessed Mother as a person by her consentâŚWe see no place in which Judas thanked God for using him.[/QUOT]
I would never suggest that Judas thanked God for using him; that would be absurdBut do you really think that early on,Judas was planning his betrayal? As far as I can see, he was a sticky-fingered, treasurer, who after being entered by Satan hatched his devious scheme(donât you just love prophecy fulfilled?!) Do you believe then that Pharoah and Delilah thanked God for using them?
![]()
]Deceivâst thou me, mine eye? 1beleevr, you may be hanging out on Catholic Answers Forums too much. Now youâre talking to the dead!
:console:
Iâll agree that itâs okay to thank dead people for something if youâll agree that itâs okay to ask saints who are alive in Christ to pray for us.]
O-H, P-U-L-E-A-S-E! Have you never thanked dead people for something; JEEZ!![]()
You are free to ask anyone you want to , to pray for you .:thumbsup:As for me I go direct.Iâll agree that itâs okay to thank dead people for something if youâll agree that itâs okay to ask saints who are alive in Christ to pray for us.
![]()
Judas isnât a saint for his role, right?Deceivâst thou me, mine eye? 1beleevr, you may be hanging out on Catholic Answers Forums too much. Now youâre talking to the dead!
:console:
Right, as far as I know. I donât know of any canonization or efforts to have him recognized him as such.Judas isnât a saint for his role, right?
Just checking. I mean he did play a crucial role, in the oh-so, negative way, which would seem to me to not be worthy of Sainthood.Right, as far as I know. I donât know of any canonization or efforts to have him recognized him as such.
We have Mary agreeing to her role]
Yes, but Mary could not have known prior to being visited by the angel! She willingly accepted her role, and was an integral part of Godâs plan!
so Judas wasnât asked but was set up??If you can come up with a credible explanation, of how and why Judas came to enter Christâs circle and come to betray Him, I am open to listen! I for one do not believe that Judas knew he would betray Jesus,
When one plays a role they are following a script,which they did not write for themselves.If Judas had not been âstickyâ fingered he wouldnât have been following Godâs plan for him.IOW are we just playing a role in a script we did not write?until Satan was allowed to enter him! But, someone had to betray Christ; it just happened to be Judas. All of the people that God has used, and is still usng, do not always sin, or bring about chaos. Thank you Judas for playing your role to a tee!![]()
Thatâs so peculiar to hear from a Protestant! * Love* that!! :dancing:]O-H, P-U-L-E-A-S-E! Have you never thanked dead people for something; JEEZ!![]()
Im not sure you can get that many variations where is the list of theological differences and we can do the math.I find it unfathomable that âChristâs churchâ would have 40,000 different understandings of Godâs Word.
Very clearly this paradigm of people starting their own church because their interpretation of Scripture differs from their pastor is just what the devil ordered. :sad_yes:
what are your sorces for these quotes?Youâre exactly right.
Letâs see what Luther had to say about Christians and their individual authority: ââŚevery Christian is by faith so exalted above all things that, by virtue of a spiritual power, he is lord of all things without exception, so that nothing can do him any harm. As a matter of fact, all things are made subject to him and are compelled to serve him in obtaining salvation.â
So letâs see how that view starts to play outâLuther starts advocating the removal of scripture from the Bible. Hereâs Luther on the book of Revelation: âto my mind it bears upon it no marks of an apostolic or prophetic character⌠Everyone may form his own judgment of this book; as for myself, I feel an aversion to it, and to me this is sufficient reason for rejecting it.â
Finally, letâs look at where Luther takes this madnessâhe admits that he added the word âaloneâ after âfaithâ in Rom. 3:28, teaching a completely new and false gospel: âIf your Papist annoys you with the word (âaloneâ), tell him straightway, Dr. Martin Luther will have it so: Papist and *** are one and the same thing. Whoever will not have my translation, let him give it the go-by: the devilâs thanks to him who censures it without my will and knowledge. Luther will have it so, and he is a doctor above all the doctors in Popedom.â
Like the serpent in the garden of Eden, Luther sets himself as the final authority in matters of faith, he attempts to destroy scripture, and he preaches an entirely new gospel. Luther has surely proved to be a wicked and false prophetâone who is to be rejected as any example for the Christian.
most of those churches would all consider themselves apart of one big universal church.Itâs the estimated number of formal non-Catholic Christian organizations, based on statistics found in the World Book of Records, plus a random number meant to represent the number of little community-centre churches that are unaffiliated with any formal Christian organization, but style themselves âChristian.â
Actually, MRL, when you do the math the possible permutations for belief systems is in the hundreds of thousands. :bigyikes: And thatâs with only taking 21 different doctrinal interpretations.Im not sure you can get that many variations where is the list of theological differences and we can do the math.
If you look at the Catholic Church, you can see exactly what she believes, what she proclaims, what she teaches (caveat: do not look to Catholics to see what Catholics believeâfor you will get as many variations as there are automobiles!most of those churches would all consider themselves apart of one big universal church.
See this post, and then this post, to see how mathematically the number of possibilities is astronomical!Im not sure you can get that many variations where is the list of theological differences and we can do the math.
Just because something is possible doesnât mean it is probable.See this post, and then this post, to see how mathematically the number of possibilities is astronomical!
I assume you are talking about a mean average. How, then, is it obviously not true?Just because something is possible doesnât mean it is probable.
Using the â40,000 denominationsâ cry that the Catholics here like to use, using the law of averages there would only be 20,000 members per denomination which is obviously not true.
Indeed. So thereâs a possibility of hundreds of thousands. Possible. Therefore 40,000 denominations is also possible, mathematically.Just because something is possible doesnât mean it is probable.
Yes but for the american mindset to âbowâ down to another authority than oneself can be next to impossible.. And, it also speaks to the fact that reading the very same verses in Scripture does not lead a Christian to a single, unified truth. Another authority is neededâthe Church, which is the pillar and foundation of truth!