I think that the generation of women who were so radically obnoxious when a man tried to hold the door are heading into their 50s and 60s and out of the public spotlight so good riddance. I always thought that many of them were hypersensitive over little things that just didn’t matter with regards to gaining parity in salaries or hiring or educational opportunities.
As a woman in my 50s, I can assure you that the vast majority of us of my generation were
not “radically obnoxious” about men holding doors, etc. As usual, the obnoxious ones made their way into the spotlight while the rest of us, the “silent majority,” went quietly about our business, thanking those who showed us respect and courtesy. And I’m a lifelong Michiganian, BTW. I don’t know what “little things that just didn’t matter” you are referring to about salaries, hiring, etc., but imagine for a moment that you are a woman working in a factory during the 1960’s, and that you doing the exact same work as anyone else, male or female…but the men are making 15% more. Now imagine that you have been there for ten years with an excellent work record, but when the foreman job comes up, your application is denied solely because you are a woman. Now tell me how that “doesn’t matter.”
Getting back to the OP’s question, I admire
anyone who shows respect for others, and if that includes traditional “chivalrous” manners, so much the better. I am not the least bit offended when a man opens doors for me, stands when I enter the room, etc., although I am more likely to consider it a matter of showing respect for my
age rather than my femininity, at this point in my life.

But in any case, the man who holds the door for me will get a “thank you” and a smile, with eye contact.
