How does one excommunicate a Pope

  • Thread starter Thread starter holdencaulfield
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually when I was considering Orthodoxy I had my profile set to Catholic/Orthodox Inquirer. I recently by the grace of the Holy Ghost understood that Orthodoxy is wrong, so I changed my profile to Catholic Inquirer to show that I am not yet Confirmed into the Church, yet I am planning on being as soon as possible.
How lovely, holden. Thank you for sharing that. You surely must know that many on this website are praying for you. Please know that you will NEVER find all answers to all questions; nor need you do so! As Our Lord promised, “My grace is sufficient to thee.” God bless you.
 
But, does any synod have any real authority to do this either? I don’t think we can really say that it does.

Patrick
I think the Pope would first need to commit some act or say something which in effect made his Papacy invalid. I’m not entirely sure who has the authority to tell the Pope that he’s fallen into such error. Given that the Pope does the appointments to the College of Cardinals, the Curia and the Bishops its also difficult to see how any of them could act to remove him as if he were a normal Head of State.

Does anyone know who has the authority to call a synod? Would a certain number of Cardinals be able to declare a synod or would they be at risk of schism to do so?

I think in the end we would probably just need to trust God to guide the actions of those in power to the right decision. Its worth pointing out that it is the Holy Spirit who guides the Cardinal Electors in their deliberations on who is elected as Pontiff. Hence so long as the majority of the Cardinals are open to that will acting upon them there should never arise the need for people to act to remove the Pope.
 
How lovely, holden. Thank you for sharing that. You surely must know that many on this website are praying for you. Please know that you will NEVER find all answers to all questions; nor need you do so! As Our Lord promised, “My grace is sufficient to thee.” God bless you.
Good point. Thank You for the prayers. Perhaps it was those that helped me. 😃 I know however that the prayers of St. Jude and the Blessed Theotokos are what helped me as well.
 
Good point snhs. I don’t know how Cardinals could call a Synod. I know that any Pope after the heretic Pope died could excommunicate the previous Pope, however this wouldn’t help if the current Pope was really bad. Perhaps if all of the Cardinals thought the Pope was wrong they would call a Synod anyways and elect a new Pope. The new Pope would of course be an anti-Pope, however perhaps if the entire Church in an Ecumenical Council agreed to him he could be elected like in the Great Western Schism.
 
On the contrary the best place to is the Fish Eaters forum. They aren’t filled with this Novus Ordo rubbish. I have yet to meet one person there who rejects Vatican II and the Novus Ordo.
Well, I am glad that the form users don’t believe what those who run the website believe. If you click here, you can go to the site and read up on some of the things I referred to. Of course, not everything at Fish Eaters is wrong. I am simply speaking of their opposition to Vatican II and the NO mass. IMHO if a group can “cafeteria-style” choose to accept some things and at the same time reject other things that God’s Church teaches, I personally don’t turn to them for info on anything related to the Church. That is me however, and I can understand if you don’t feel the same way. God bless.
 
To excommunicate a pope, type your theses up and nail them to the nearest church door. Then after a time of fasting on a diet of worms, you are free to start you own church and excommunicate the Pope from your church.

Seriously, shouldn’t this be addressed to a canon lawyer?
 
Have you read what some in the Hierarchy have said about the NO, including our Holy Father ? I’m not going to post the quotes, because I’ve recently decided that it isn’t in the best interest of the Church to do so. Knowing that there are those in todays Curia who share the concerns of the traditionalists is enough for me.

But my point is, to reject FE site as a whole, because of the general thoughts towards the No, is also to reject the opinions of some in Rome. That said, to whom do we turn ?

The “wolves” our Holy Father mentioned at his inaugural Mass ?
The “wolves” mentioned were not a reference to the Magisterium or those who participated in V2. I suppose that when the Holy Father declares Vatican II a mistake and announces that the Church will revert back to pre-Vatican II practices, I will agree with you. However, I think that you will have to admit that this will never come to be, so perhaps, you and I should simply agree that we will never agree on the issue of the Church’s authority vs. man’s authority concerning this subject. God bless.
 
Well, I am glad that the form users don’t believe what those who run the website believe. If you click here, you can go to the site and read up on some of the things I referred to. Of course, not everything at Fish Eaters is wrong. I am simply speaking of their opposition to Vatican II and the NO mass. IMHO if a group can “cafeteria-style” choose to accept some things and at the same time reject other things that God’s Church teaches, I personally don’t turn to them for info on anything related to the Church. That is me however, and I can understand if you don’t feel the same way. God bless.
Haha, calling FishEaters “cafeteria-style”. How ironic.

The site is allowed to voice its opinion about V2 and the NO. I didn’t find anything saying that either is invalid. There is no manifest heresy, and certainly no rejection of what has been revealed by the Church.

Be careful with your accusations.
 
Thanks! Please remember my “sand Sailors” here, too, in your prayers.
 
Haha, calling FishEaters “cafeteria-style”. How ironic.

The site is allowed to voice its opinion about V2 and the NO. I didn’t find anything saying that either is invalid. There is no manifest heresy, and certainly no rejection of what has been revealed by the Church.

Be careful with your accusations.
I’ll let their essays speak for themselves. Should you use the link I provided earlier you’ll find the essays. One of many being the Dictionary of Dissent. LOL I find it laughable, that you find it ironic, that I find FishEaters a cafeteria-style website. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck…
Yes, FishEaters can indeed voice their opposition to V2 and the NO Mass. I’m grateful that they do as it makes it very easy to see them for what they are… dissenters. God bless.
 
To excommunicate a pope, type your theses up and nail them to the nearest church door. Then after a time of fasting on a diet of worms, you are free to start you own church and excommunicate the Pope from your church.
Huh?
Seriously, shouldn’t this be addressed to a canon lawyer?
I think that you meant your reply for someone else.
 
Pope Honorius was declared a heretic by the East AFTER his death as a political move… so I really don’t think this argument holds much water.
Peace.
Uh, Pope Honorius was declared a heretic by an Ecumenical Council. That is not just “the East”. You need to learn some history. Joe
 
Maybe God would call him home to discuss the matter in person.
Not sure how true this is but I’ve heard it said that when a Pope dies suddenly, it is the Holy Spirit preventing the church from going astray because of false doctrine.
 
I’d like to see the documentation you use to substantiate this claim. In reality, a pope cannot be deposed, even by a general council.
A Pope can certainly be deposed; the Catholic Church has experienced this from time to time, like for instance the Western Schism when Popes and anti-Popes would depose one another. Of course, one could say that the anti-Popes weren’t real Popes, but given the context of the time then, they acted in good faith and thought themselves to be the successor to Peter, thus exercising their power to depose another bishop. A Council can depose a Pope as well, since the Pope is a bishop, and just like any bishop can be deposed if he is in error and will not recant of such an error.
A number of theologians have thought, however, that a pope who becomes a manifest heretic would cease to be pope.
He ceases to be such, and a Council deposing him would formalize what is known de facto That would be the most prudent rather than lead the Catholic Church into error with him.
 
the pope can be a heretic , but owing to divine intervention not one word will be added to or deleted from catholic teaching on faith and morals, fully guaranteed by jesus christ.
 
I assume that a new Pope must either do it or an Ecumenical Council be called. Can this be done while the heretic Pope is still alive.
No, many a Pope has been excommunicated. The prime example is Pope Honorius who was excommunicated for being a heretic. Before the Great Schism this was easy to do because the of the other Patriarchs.

Hadn’t Honorius set HIMSELF up to be Pope rather than being chosen by the college of Cardinals as is the usual procudure. Since he was never chosen by the Cardinals as Pope, you can’t say he was really excommunicated.

I believe that the normal process for this would be for the next Pope to excommunicate the Pope before him, or for someone to call an Ecumenical Council before or after the Popes term ends, and to then excommunicate him. That is all I can think of. I’m sure however it is Canon Law somewhere.
 
I’m pretty sure you could depose a Pope in extreme cases.

What if a Pope decided to convert to Islam, and said he was going to destroy St. Peter’s, all the Churches in Rome, and all the art in the Vatican because they were idolatrous?
This has never happened: that’s why I say it’s all theory. Admittedly St. Robert Bellarmine wrote that one may resist a pope who would destroy the Church, but there has never been a case of a living pope deposed. Some believe that the college of cardinals could declare that the pope has become a manifest heretic and abdicated his office-- again, all theory.

There is nobody who may depose a pope, since that is the action of a superior, and on earth the pope has no human superior.

I’m pretty sure the Curia would have the Swiss Guard arrest him, and convene the College of Cardinals, or an Ecumenical Council, and elect a new Pope. They might have him declared mentally incompetent or something to save face, but they’d act.

God Bless
 
I’m pretty sure the Curia would have the Swiss Guard arrest him, and convene the College of Cardinals, or an Ecumenical Council, and elect a new Pope. They might have him declared mentally incompetent or something to save face, but they’d act.

God Bless
Doesn’t anyone have faith that God would never allow it to come to this? It is, after all, His Church and Christ has already told us that it will prevail til the end. God bless.
 
Doesn’t anyone have faith that God would never allow it to come to this? It is, after all, His Church and Christ has already told us that it will prevail til the end. God bless.
I didn’t post what you quoted me as saying, and you know it. You might want to retract that-- unless you think Benedict XVI gave you license to lie on this forum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top