I had no need of the second rain because ***I was still lying ***dead because the first was non existent. Had I needed the second, then supposedly being one of His adopted children, God in His mercy and grace would had provided it.
Dead or dormant. How do you know? Feelings?
Even Moses asked those below to make a choice and then threw the tablets…
i
ve already commented on that one: cowardice, loss of faith etc. To be sure of the Truth, take heed of the current successor of Saint Peter. Peter is the only one (along with his successors) for whom our Lord prayed that his faith wouldnt fail.
Don`t forget: Judas was one of the Twelve.
I’m trying not to judge but truthful doctrine leads to truthful living and actions. I don’t see that from 90% of the Catholics I know.
Those 90% are the Laodiceans: they know almost nothing, and they wish to stay knowing almost nothing…
You`ll probably find a higher percentage in most Protestant denominations. Tragic, but a sign of the corrupt and decadent West.
If the Spirit indeed lives in you when your adopted into God’s family in the act of the CC baptism, then the Spirit would testify of Christ Jesus, and draw you to the instruction of the Father, which is His Word. When the Ethiopian needed a teacher, God called Philip to instruct. The problem here is the Spirit was not present in my childhood, there was no calling and therefore no instruction was required.
You
re going by feelings. How do you know the Spirit wasnt present? “It takes two to tango.” Some of the blame was yours, maybe? No inclination to learn? And no matter how abominable your religious “education” was, don
t try to tell me that you didnt have some idea of right and wrong until you came across some tract.
I knew “Total certainty” when changes were evident in my life that spoke of forgiveness without a priest.
Feelings…can be dangerous.
How do you know that the foundation for those changes wasn
t laid down at your Baptism. In spite of Publishers statement, Baptism (using water) is orthodox teaching and Biblical
You can sling off at priests as much as you like, but that doesn
t alter the Truth of our Lords words.
I’m giving you the opportunity, right? I have studied the CC doctrine as far as I’m able to understand on the CC encyclopedia etc. But, many times I find even there that the doctrines speak from two mouths.
In an early post, (# 5) you said that “The Spirit has yet to draw me or ever lead me to pick up a copy of the Catechism of the Catholic Church.” So… Which “spirit” is it? Maybe your own, not wanting to face the possibility that your concept oof the Church is wrong, and that the Church is correct.
And how about an example or two of the speaking “from two mouths”? The Church is not two faced. H Kung and R McBrien (just as examples) are not faithful Catholics, and their writings are poison.
Tell that to your own flock…Because they have been horrible taught as well and are under the pretense that they are buying Masses for the dead. Where are your teachers? The lack of teaching is resident because although you say one is true they desire and practice the other.
Pope Benedict and
the bishops who are in union with him are our teachers.
Sincerely, I have torn apart those anti-Catholic tracts and found many lies. But that alone doesn’t authenticate the CC. The church needs to stand true on it’s own.
It seems that some of the anti-Catholicism in those tracts rubbed off. How many other anti-Catholic lies have you (maybe unknowingly) picked up.
The Church has been standing true on Its own for the past 1,980 years, and will still be doing that on Doomsday…and forever. Its teachings on Faith and Morals have expanded and deepened, but no later teaching (on F & M) has ever contradicted an earlier one, nor can that ever happen.
A perfect example of constancy:
Until the 1930s, ALL major Protestant denominations condemned contraception. Anglicanism collapsed, and the other dominoes followed. The Catholic Church is the only one which held firm, and will do so until the end.
The house built on rock will not fall.
There`s a heresy which has come to be known as “
Americanism”. Among other things, its promoting of individualism goes too far…
www.bringyou.to/apologetics/p22.htm -
Read Pope Leo XIII`s encyclical “Testem Benevolantiae Nostrae” as well. Link to EWTN library at the bottom of the page.
The whole thing opens your eyes to the attutudes of dissident “Catholics”, including ones in influentual positions…and others, including YOURSELF.
We Catholics are being tested. It might be God`s way of separating the geep from the shoats.
Looking for scapegoats is unhealthy.
Axe-grinding is dangerous as well: you could end up slicing yourself.