How many deny Jesus Christ in the Eucharist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rinnie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Don’t have to accept anything like the rest of you do. I believe in some things and don’t believe in some things. Some things that the CC teaches just don’t stand to reason, like the bread becoming Jesus.
What bothers me is that it is always said in discussion here. I must here it at least 5 times in one thread. It seem that that is what you, meaning the CC, says when they get kinda stuck in an answer. “Well we been around for 2000 years so we’re right.” You are Catholic so it would stand to reason that you can’t hear it enough.
The trinity, yes I do accept it. Like I said, there are some things I accept and some I don’t.
Dear RevKev,

Question: What denomination do you belong you then?

I know what you mean. The thing with “We are 2000 years old and therefore must be right” is also getting on my nerves.

I also don’t believe in a flesh becoming Jesus during transubstantiation during mass. (see above!)

Best wishes,
Esdra
 
Well, believe it or not, I simply can’t believe that with the “it” the transfiguration is meant (I think the transfiguration is a pagan rite like roy5 has stated some posts previous and came into Christianity 350 or so, when Christianity became the only Religion in the Roman Empire!). “It” = the whole teaching of Christ. They went away because after hearing the thing with eating His flesh and drinking His blood they for sure new that Jesus can’t be the Messias who will free them from the Romans!
Before, however, Jesus behaved like those Messias. (Sorry, I don’t have any examples right now!)

B.w.,
E.
Regarding the pagan rite thing…

Catholicism took things from the pagan world and elevated and sanctified it.

Just like when Jesus embraced the lepers he did not become diseased–he transformed the leper and made him clean. Catholicism does the same thing.
 
Every year after lent I am taught something very important. This time for some reason I could not get my mind off of the Eucharist.

John 6:66 (the devils numbers) That blows my mind.

Did anyone ever really make that connection. That is the scripture where the disciples that could not accept the true teaching that Jesus Christ in the Eucharist is the living Christ left Jesus and walked away.

Judas comes to mind. It was Judas that was one of his Apostles and left Jesus. Did you notice when he left him. At the Eucharist!!! Judas could not accept that teaching.

As a kid me and my brother when we were first beginning to drive would go to Church and split right after communion. My Dad would always say are you like Judas are you going to leave right after the Eucharist:confused:

I never really understood until years later what he was saying. Trust me I stay now!!:o

Jesus was quite clear when he stated For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. John 6:53-56)

Even the disciples said this is a hard saying who can listen to it? See Jesus knew some would not believe. This is where Judas fell away. John 6:64.

Many say he was speaking sybolically. But he wasn’t. If so both the Jews who were suspicious of him and the disciples who accepted everything up to this point would have remained with him if he were.

But he did not correct the protesters.

12 times he said he was the bread that came down from heaven.

4 times he said he said they would have to eat my flesh and drink my blood.

Who can really accept this teaching? Can you?

We as Roman Catholic’s are not just symbolically commemorating Jesus in the Eucharist we are actually participating in his body and blood as Paul tells us.

The cup of blessing which we bless, IS IT NOT a participation in the blood of Christ. The bread which we bread, IS IT NOT a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor 10:16)

Jesus said DO THIS in memory of me!! Do This!!!
One last thought.

When you write “Is Jesus Christ in the Eucharist?”, I actually have to answer with YES, he IS in a service where one or two are came together in His name.
I don’t believe he is exactly IN Bread or Wine after transubstantiation, but I believe that he IS present when there is somewhere in the World a service, or people come together to pray to Him or when people come together to hear His word, also in bible-evenings (where Brothers and Sisters in Christ meet to read the Holy Bible together and discuss it!).
So, yes He IS there - but not as you believe, dear Catholics. He is there, as he had promised us to be: 20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them. (Matthew 18,20)

Best wishes,
Esdra
 
So why did you leave? Were you well catechized?c

To be perfectly honest: I don’t know what the verb catechized means.
I guess it has to do something with Catechism. If so, no, I was never interested in that and I never read it. When I was the first time in an Evangelical Lutheran Service i “fall so in love” with the protestant teachings that I began from that day on only read in the Bible, and not in the Catechism, for the Catechism is the Word of Mankind, not of God!! (This is only the very very minimum short version of why I left the RCC. It is simply too long to write it down here!)
Was Matthew written before John?
 
PRMerger
Code:
I'm about through dialoguing, because you obviously are not interested in a helpful discussion.

However, in response: I recently was executor of an estate of a thoroughly orthodox Catholic; one of my brothers lives in a mobile home and other folks I know, also; no, I don't know any who worship Satan but I know some Wiccan-oriented people; a couple of my elderly relatives, sadly, are prejudiced toward Blacks; I really don't know how many of my friends use birth control unapproved by the Catholic Church, and it's not my business; I know some employees at Wal-Mart; my mother only finished the 8th grade and my grandfather was illiterate; no, I haven't seen a friend wear that particular T-shirt, nor would I recommend that s/he wear one. Would you?

 Sorry, but you have a stereotype that is so far from reality that further discussion is pointless.
 
Dear RevKev,

Question: What denomination do you belong you then?

I know what you mean. The thing with “We are 2000 years old and therefore must be right” is also getting on my nerves.

I also don’t believe in a flesh becoming Jesus during transubstantiation during mass. (see above!)

Best wishes,
Esdra
Baptist.
He or she was refering to Catholic when he or she said like the rest of us.
 
rinnie thank you for trying. I get a little hot headed myself sometines reading these posts, and it becomes a struggle, when I want to say " where did you get that from!!"
I love to discuss scripture and learn. I have no problem walking away not agreeing, but take the time to really look at the position of others and try to see their point of view. so be patient and we can have a wonderful conversation.
I am not sure what you are asking so if this is it let me know.

Are you asking if everyone that followed Jesus believe that he was truly God.

what I am suggesting from Johns text is that first one must believe that Christ was the Messiah. remember when Christ asked Peter the question " who do people say I am?" what was Peters reply to the question? HInt Some say Elijah…
The people understood that he was from God in some way, but not always, necessarily God or the Messiah.

If that is what you are asking I cannot honestly answer it. Nor can anyone else if you ask me. Only God truly knows the heart and mind of a person.
I agree. and achording to this passage in John, it thespirit of God that convicts, but John gives us a glimps at the end of the chapter.

Joh 6:64 But still some of you have no faith. For it was clear to Jesus from the first who they were who had no faith, and who it was who would be false to him.
Joh 6:65 And he said, This is why I said to you, No man is able to come to me if he is not given the power to do so by the Father.

But I can tell you what I assume from what scripture says.

I try not to assume to much in Scripture unless it is very clear. but I am still human.🤷 The bible I read was translated by over 85 scholars, translating them to todays language. but the trick is not just translating in to the english , french or some other language, the culture, understanding and world view must be taken into concideration.

If you Love me keep my word. Jesus did say that there are many kind of followers.

and the parable of the sower demonstrates that.

I know that I can only answer for my self. My mother always told me that was all I had to worry about, she said when I get done confessing my sins I won’t have any time to worry about anyone elses:D

agreed. I am luck to take care of myself most day. in the middle of working manditory 58 hour weeks at the moment.

BUt here is what my Dad told me all my life about faith. You are either hot or cold you cannot be lukewarm.

I agree with your dad. remember what Christ said to the church in Philadelphia.

Re 3:15 I have knowledge of your works, that you are not cold or warm: it would be better if you were cold or warm.
Re 3:16 So because you are not one thing or the other, I will have no more to do with you.

It took me a year after he died to understand what he meant. And I believe that may be what you are asking me.

The scripture is Revelations. You either accept all of the words of Christ and follow his commandments or you don’t. You must be your best every second of your life. You must have Jesus in your heart every second of you life. You must pray everyday for the Holy Spirit to give you grace. It is with that grace that you can be what God asks you to be.

But it must be consistant not lukewarm. Papa said you must be HOT!! Sorry not yelling:D

Smoking Hot!!

I know there are many people who believe in God but do not want to obey his commandments. Hey I myself don’t like to obey all the time.

Like yesterday it was the first nice day we had all week. My husband and I wanted so bad to hit the pub on the bike it was wing night and bike night and have a couple beers and unwind.

But Guess what It was a Holy Day too. If I have to be totally honest I would have rather hit the Pub. But I did go to Church because it is a Holy Day and God said. But honestly when I hit the Church, I knew I made the right move!!

you did good 👍

So yesterday I was Hot:eek: You have to choose God All the time. Its hard, We all know that. If I could just stay hot for one whole week that would be awesome. So maybe could throw a couple prayers my way too. Okay

If that is not you question ask it again, I promise to answer it for ya.
rinnie, I understand what you believe regarding John chapter 6. but can you explain it to me in your own words? I am quite pleased with your zeal for the Lord. but becareful. Zeal is a good thing when your are right and not so good of thing when you are wrong. Just ask the apostle Paul. I still want to ask him what the thorn in the side was?:rolleyes:

at this time I am not saying I am right or that what the catholic church teaches is right.

I am a detective decifering all the information, making sure that the evidence is air tight before fully acepting the out come. I have read all the arguments from both sides here. and I do not yet see that communion as practiced by the Catholic are correct. I don’t see it in John 6 as you do, when taking the chapter into concideration, including his purpose statement in chapter 20. If you go back and look at the accounts of the upper room, Judas was not there when he instituted communion.

question. Why would Jesus teach those that where against him or didn’t accept him in John 6 about the Eucharist, and not do the same in the upper room?

I respect your belief, but I am not there.

I enjoyed answering your post. it was very nice. thank you I hope i made some sense. let me know Cruisin
 
:signofcross:

You have a bad outlook on things especially those who are not Catholic. :tsktsk: No you did not ask me to finish his work, since when did I need your permission to finish something for someone else. You like to argue with people and use snide comments. I asked you to continue with what the thread is about, but you can’t seem to do that. So once again can we continue with what the thread is about? Do I have your premission :bowdown: to continue with the topic of the thread.
I’m here not trying to change anything that you or the Catholic church teaches, taught or believes. I’m here to give my side and my beliefs on subjects. I know I can’t change the CC’s teachings or doctrine or dogma’s and would never try to. Its what you and the CC believes then believe it. I don’t put you down for it like you do us for our beliefs. I think a little less of the snide remarks and a little more Christianity on your part would be helpful to you. There is no need for remarks like the ones you are giving.
Bad outlook on those who are not Catholic? Ah no! What I cannot figure out why someone as yourself who as admitted you do not agree with the RCC,spends so much time in here? What is your goal here? What can you possibly gain by disagreeing with us? We do not agree with Baptists,so what is the point?
 
Esdra:

I think it is very presumptuous to compare Jesus with a Church of Humans as the RCC is.

Wow! A church of humans? I did not know Jesus left a church of non-humans? Then what was it supposed to comprise of? Dogs? Angels?

**Paganism DID change the whole Catholic Church and I simply can’t accept the pagan teachings in the RCC, for they are not of Christ. **

Pure NONSENSE and pure IGNORANCE! Well I got breaking news for you,not ONE Protestant church was founded by Jesus or the Apostles ( A fact of ancient church history) and many of their teachings are bogus and novel stemming from ALL its human founders. So if Jesus did not found ANY Protestant (A FACT OF HISTORY and LIFE),I guess that makes them pagan in origin since a human founded it.

And please don’t start now with “Well, Peter was the First Pope and the Pope is infallible” etc… and "The RCC was founded by Christ and endured 2000 years!"

And please do not start with the ignorant display of history,which runs wild among Protestants.

Jesus only founded, if ever, (Remember? Jesus was a fathful Jew to his death!) the Ancient Christianity and NOT the RCC and I see the AC restored in the Protestant Churches (at least in most of them!)

Your contradictions are mind boggling! It is so evident you have the slighest clue about ancient Christianity it was NOTHING like the chaos of Protestanism. Protestanism restored it? Riigghhtt!

Jesus FOUNDED a church,time to learn history and read your Bible again. Ancient Christianity was RESTORED in most Protestant churches? No offense,but that is laughable. Which out of the thousands upon thousands restored it,since apparently they differ; hence the huge divisions.

How can the MAJORITY of them have restored "ancient Christianity’ according to you,if NONE are older than 500 years old? Restored what? None have a liturgy close to the ancient liturgical churches (Catholic,Orthodox,Coptic,etc) The fact there exists over 39,000 non-Catholics churches is a far cry of restoring ancient Christianity.

Protestanism is nothing but theological chaos and madness! Confusion at its best!
 
Bad outlook on those who are not Catholic? Ah no! What I cannot figure out why someone as yourself who as admitted you do not agree with the RCC,spends so much time in here? What is your goal here? What can you possibly gain by disagreeing with us? We do not agree with Baptists,so what is the point?
I answered your question as to why I’m here. Did you not read it?
What can I gain you ask. I gain nothing except giving my point of view on different subjects, and getting the point of view of the Catholic faith on subjects, which by the way is my right here in the Non-Catholic Religion site.
What is your outlook on Non-Catholics?
I admit that I don’t agree with SOME of what the RCC teaches NOT all things, and I have said this time after time here on many different threads.
You speak for all Catholics here now. I know YOU don’t agree with Baptists or any other denomination that is not Catholic.
 
PRMerger
Code:
I'm beginning to think that you either like to gaggle or you don't understand my position. I am saying that the Christian Church should be broad enough to welcome people of differing views, except for those who might advocate murder, theft, etc. So, you would be welcome in the Church I envision, despite views of yours with which I may not agree. No big deal, Christians disagreeing among themselves on many issues. Some day we will know who was right, if any of us, which I rather doubt. My guess is that we, with our finite minds, don't have much of a clue when it comes to ultimate spiritual truth. That's why humanity has concocted all sorts of beliefs. Trust in God and love of one another - as Christ stated - is basic, Much of the rest is conjecture.

 The problem is that I apparently would not be welcome in your church unless I accepted all of its doctrines etc. Fine. But people like you here on CAF have about convinced me that I don't belong in the Catholic Church. However, most of my Catholic friends, like most of my Protestant friends, seem to be far more relaxed about such matters and don't insist that their concept of truth is the only correct one. I find the UCC, Presbyterians, Methodists, Episcopalians, and others - 'big tent' churches - all the more appealing now that I have been on CAF for awhile. But one of my favororite columnists, Fr. NcBrien of Notre Dame, seems to embrace and promote a very different Catholicism. Is Catholicism divided rather like Protestantism, but it operates behind a facade of unity? I'm beginning to wonder. Most Protestants I know don't seem to feel the need to agree on everything, but allow for a wide variation without condemnation. They appear to range from very liberal (Unitarianish) to mildly evangelical.
*You see Roy while we Catholics believe in one absolute truth in regard to the core beliefs of the Catholic Church the Church is not exclusive - on the contrary she is inclusive. The Church is One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic.

This thing of your truth, my truth, his truth, her truth, their truth etc is what splits and that is why you get so many Protestant denominations.

Sure among the faithful there are many ignorant Catholics who really do not know their Faith. They are what we call “Cafetaria Catholics” - you know, like looking at a menu and picking out what they like and don’t like. I agree that it is not always easy to be Catholic. I have been through all the stages and went from being a Revolutionary (militant) to my return to the Church and now find myself become more uncompromising and perhaps orthodox in regard to my Faith while still loving and caring for my friends who may be very far away from these things. The lessons of life have taught me much and I recognize the beauty of truth.

I have friends from other denominations. I have friends who are homosexual (they are good people and I love them although I do not love what they do - incidentally they are homosexual not gay (sub-culture).

I find the Catholic Church extremely exciting and beautiful and I hunger to learn more and more. Holy Mother Church is a refuge and a light. Yes, it is a constant battle being holy especially in the world today.

Your beliefs as expressed on this thread Roy have elements of new age thinking and I think you should look into that and analyse your statements.

I have often prayed for the Anglican Church, I have great respect for Methodists and contributed to the Salvation Army (who do great work). I strongly believe in ecumenism. I look forward to unity. Jesus said that one day there will be one flock and one shepherd.

In the meantime the Catholic Church continues to fight the troubled waters of humanity but the Holy Spirit is there to guide and enlighten - Jesus’ promise is always there to encourage and nourish.

God bless all
Cinette:):)*
 
Hi,

one question: What makes you so sure that the Catholic faith is the only true church where you can find salvation and that it is founded by Christ?
In my opinion Christ founded the Ancient Christianity!
The Catholic Church, as we know it now, is a syncresy between the pagan rites of the Roman Empire and Christianity (as stated too often in this Board! - also by me - have a look at my profile!)

By the way I would never dare to say that the Baptist faith (or any other Church) is the only true one founded by Christ. I only dare to say that it is the right Church FOR ME (and all the other protestant Churches as long they believe in the Trinity, the Bible and have Christ as the Head of their Community (cf. Eph 1,22; Kol 2,19)!).
I also dare to say that, in my opinion, the Protestant Churches (those mentioned above. - You won’t believe who calls himself a Protestant today!) are closer to the Ancient Christians. But I would never say that Catholicism is wrong or so - just that it is not that close to Ancient Christianity than most Protestant Churches! Catholicism HAS it’s truth. Catholics DO believe in the Bible, but there are also some of those former ancient rites that came into it and so makes it, at least for me, farer away from Ancient Christianity!!

God bless you,
Esdra
*Oh Esdra do please enlighten me! You make some very bold claims namely that the Protestant churches are closer to the Ancient Church. How is that? Do please give me the history of this because I have always thought that Protestantism began with Luther.

You say you were a Catholic. I prefer to refer to you as non-Catholic because if it were true that you are in effect an ex-Catholic that would be serious. I think that, like me, you were in all probability not fully catechised.

God bless all
Cinette:) *
 
Nicea:

I think it is very presumptuous to compare Jesus with a Church of Humans as the RCC is.

Wow! A church of humans? I did not know Jesus left a church of non-humans? Then what was it supposed to comprise of? Dogs? Angels?

Well, I think you know what I mean! I am talking of Human in Contrast to God!

**Paganism DID change the whole Catholic Church and I simply can’t accept the pagan teachings in the RCC, for they are not of Christ. **

Pure NONSENSE and pure IGNORANCE! Well I got breaking news for you,not ONE Protestant church was founded by Jesus or the Apostles ( A fact of ancient church history) and many of their teachings are bogus and novel stemming from ALL its human founders. So if Jesus did not found ANY Protestant (A FACT OF HISTORY and LIFE),I guess that makes them pagan in origin since a human founded it.

I know! But Jesus founded the Ancient Christianity (described very well in the Bible!). AND the Reformators like Calvin, Zwingli, Luther etc. RESTORED the Ancient Christianity by reading the ORIGINAL NT and AT and then founding new Churches. BUT what is important: In most questions of teaching most Protestant Churches are not as divergant as you keep saying!! Those who diverge a lot are “sects” in my eyes. And yes, you are right, there are many of those sects. (But didn’t Jesus even prophesise that in the Bible? Have a look at Mt 24,10-14)
And don’t tell me that I don’t know History! At least I have been studying History for a year at university! 😉

And please don’t start now with “Well, Peter was the First Pope and the Pope is infallible” etc… and "The RCC was founded by Christ and endured 2000 years!"


And please do not start with the ignorant display of history,which runs wild among Protestants.

**Did I? Do you really I think I don’t know that 500 years are less then 2,000? Yes, the RCC (together with the oriental Orthodox Churches) are older, but does that necessarily mean, that they are the right churches? No, because they all (including the Eastern Orthodox Churches) are since 350 AD no pure Christians anymore, but a syncresis between the pagan Rites of the Roman Empire (which were many of!) and Christianity! **

Jesus only founded, if ever, (Remember? Jesus was a fathful Jew to his death!) the Ancient Christianity and NOT the RCC and I see the AC restored in the Protestant Churches (at least in most of them!)

Your contradictions are mind boggling! It is so evident you have the slighest clue about ancient Christianity it was NOTHING like the chaos of Protestanism. Protestanism restored it? Riigghhtt!

I think you should start reading more in the NT and start contrasting with the teachings of the major Protestants Churches! - Then you will see what I mean. I did so for many years and I now know what I am talking about! But I guess one has to find that out for oneself…

Jesus FOUNDED a church,time to learn history and read your Bible again. Ancient Christianity was RESTORED in most Protestant churches? No offense,but that is laughable. Which out of the thousands upon thousands restored it,since apparently they differ; hence the huge divisions.

Okay, if you want so, yes, Jesus FOUNDED a church. BUT, and that’s important, not the RCC, but the Ancient Christianity (those of the Acts and the Letters of the Apostels! Again: Start reading the Holy Bible!)!

How can the MAJORITY of them have restored "ancient Christianity’ according to you,if NONE are older than 500 years old? Restored what? None have a liturgy close to the ancient liturgical churches (Catholic,Orthodox,Coptic,etc) The fact there exists over 39,000 non-Catholics churches is a far cry of restoring ancient Christianity.

** answer to that: see above!**

Protestanism is nothing but theological chaos and madness! Confusion at its best!

** Well, I can’t agree with you. It is the Restoration of the Ancient Christianity. Apparently you don’t know much about Protestantism…
See, that’s the difference between me and you! I have always been interested in other denomination and have read a lot about them, even when I was a Catholic! You should also do that, then you would understand, what Protestantism really is.**

God bless you,
Esdra
 
Oh Esdra do please enlighten me! You make some very bold claims namely that the Protestant churches are closer to the Ancient Church. How is that? Do please give me the history of this because I have always thought that Protestantism began with Luther.

You say you were a Catholic. I prefer to refer to you as non-Catholic because if it were true that you are in effect an ex-Catholic that would be serious. I think that, like me, you were in all probability not fully catechised.

God bless all
Cinette:)
Hi Cinette,

Yes, you are completely right, Protestentism only began with Luther. But, do you also know why?
Before Luther were a lot of “Protestant Churches” whose members were burned - from the Catholic Church, because they didn’t want to accept that they were in some points right some 1,500 years! I am referring to the Hugenotts in France or the Katharer (I only know the German words, hope that they are similar in English! ;)).
I strongly believe that the “true” Christianity was (at least partley - most protestant don’t live together in one house and have everything together… cf. Acts 2,44 and Acts 4,32) restored through the Reformators. They read the Holy Bible (even in their original languages Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic) and they found out how the First Christians, the Ancient Christians, as I call them, must have lived, and made a teaching out of that. And so, in my opinion the Ancient Christianity, found by Jesus, was restored.
Believe me, I have studied the bible quite well and I am keeping on studying and what I read, interpreted by the Holy Spirit in me, gives me the certainity, that it was the Right Decision to leave the RCC. Also in the service in my Baptist Community I feel that I have made the right desicion - and I am sure that the Ancient Christians did their services very similar to those in most Protestant Churches - Nevertheless I am sure that the service certainly didn’t look like an orthodox or a catholic Mass today!
I advice you, as I already did Nicea (please also read my answer to her - it may be interesting for you as well!), to start reading Acts and the letters of the Apostels.

Yes, I was a Catholic - but that’s long ago. I quite realized that many teachings of the RCC can’t be true according to the words of our Saviour Christ Jesus! (I was abou 15 years of age!) - So I began to read and study, yes also in Ancient Mythology, in the LDS scriptures and also in the Holy Bible. But my search is completed - I found what I lacked in the RCC in my Saviour Christ Jesus and in my Baptist Community.
Since I still don’t know for sure what “catechize” means I, however, can’t answer your question if I was or not…

Best wishes,
Esdra
 
Hi Cinette,

Yes, you are completely right, Protestentism only began with Luther. But, do you also know why?
Before Luther were a lot of “Protestant Churches” whose members were burned - from the Catholic Church, because they didn’t want to accept that they were in some points right some 1,500 years! I am referring to the Hugenotts in France or the Katharer (I only know the German words, hope that they are similar in English! ;)).
I strongly believe that the “true” Christianity was (at least partley - most protestant don’t live together in one house and have everything together… cf. Acts 2,44 and Acts 4,32) restored through the Reformators. They read the Holy Bible (even in their original languages Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic) and they found out how the First Christians, the Ancient Christians, as I call them, must have lived, and made a teaching out of that. And so, in my opinion the Ancient Christianity, found by Jesus, was restored.
Believe me, I have studied the bible quite well and I am keeping on studying and what I read, interpreted by the Holy Spirit in me, gives me the certainity, that it was the Right Decision to leave the RCC. Also in the service in my Baptist Community I feel that I have made the right desicion - and I am sure that the Ancient Christians did their services very similar to those in most Protestant Churches - Nevertheless I am sure that the service certainly didn’t look like an orthodox or a catholic Mass today!
I advice you, as I already did Nicea (please also read my answer to her - it may be interesting for you as well!), to start reading Acts and the letters of the Apostels.

Yes, I was a Catholic - but that’s long ago. I quite realized that many teachings of the RCC can’t be true according to the words of our Saviour Christ Jesus! (I was abou 15 years of age!) - So I began to read and study, yes also in Ancient Mythology, in the LDS scriptures and also in the Holy Bible. But my search is completed - I found what I lacked in the RCC in my Saviour Christ Jesus and in my Baptist Community.
Since I still don’t know for sure what “catechize” means I, however, can’t answer your question if I was or not…

Best wishes,
Esdra
*Oh I understand - what you are saying is that Jesus did not keep his promise and that the Holy Spirit made a mess and then the Protestants intevened and fixed things up.

OK I get you

God bless all
Cinette:):)*
 
*Oh I understand - what you are saying is that Jesus did not keep his promise and that the Holy Spirit made a mess and then the Protestants intevened and fixed things up.

OK I get you

God bless all
Cinette:):)*
Hi,

no, dearest Cinette, you didn’t get me!
Nor Jesus nor the Holy Spirit did something wrong. - Only humans! By the way - that doesn’t astonish me at all - 2000 years is a looooong time! 😉
Especially because the RCC never wanted any change!! Well - she still doesn’t. Eucumene would be far easier if the Orthodox Churches and the RCC wouldn’t be that afraid of changes! (Dogma not needed. The pope is ONLY the bishop of Rome and nothing more. Women should be priests. Celibacy not needed. etc. These majors should be done in near future. - otherwise I see a dark future for the RCC…)

Well, but yes, the Protestants fixed it - sort of. You could put it like this. Right.
Just take your’re time and start reading the NT (especially Acts and the Letters) - then after some time of studying you will understand what I mean! 🙂

B.w.,
E.
 
Ummm, @ Esdra: Du sagst du warst Katholisch, aber weisst nicht was der Katechismus ist? Bist du als Kind nie in den Religionsunterricht gegangen?

I asked him/her about not knowing what catechized/catechism means (especially since the German word is basically the same). And I know that Austria has, or at least used to have, religious instruction even in public schools.
 
*Dear Esdra -

We are reading Acts every day at Mass at the moment. I think you do not understand what the Catholic Church is about really.

Celibacy is necessary although I think that perhaps one day there might be an order for married priests.

If you think that the abuse scandal is because of celibacy you are very wrong. There have been homosexual priests with a lack of holiness that managed to come into the priesthood. It is also a reflection of the sex revolution and the relaxed nature of today’s society. I would hate to say that homosexuals are predators. I believe that a homosexual person could be holy and celibate and be an excellent priest. There is a tendancy in certain people/homosexuals to be immature and lack certain qualities. These terrible scandals have certainly hurt the Church but the Church has taken strict measures to ensure that such things will never happen again. In fact Canon Law provides for the punishment of such transgressors but the fact is that the Bishops did not act forcefully.

It is also true that Psychologists and Psychiatrists at one time thought that such abuse could be cured (this in relation to pedophilia). They declared such people cured after treatment but we know today that this is not possible unless the person is determined - a bit like an addictive alcholic. When I think of such things I become angry.

I believe that it is necessary to be celibate because a man’s first responsibility is his family and a priest has his flock to take care of. We need always to pray for our priests.

In regard to Church history you should read the NT (Matthew) especially where Jesus establishes His Church. He promised that he would be with us always and that the evil one would not overcome his Church and that the Holy Spirit would guide the Church. In fact when you look at history and all the battles the Church has had with heretics etc. the Church has survived so many adversaries and it is a testimony to Jesus’ promise.

Catechised means that you never studied your Faith properly - you were not properly taught or sufficiently taught. You need to know why we believe what we believe and when you know that you will realise that it is right. It is not easy but true Christianity is never easy.

The Church does change but the changes are never to the truth and core beliefs. The Church plays a part in our daily lives in many spheres. You should read the book “How the Catholic Church built Western Civilization” by Thomas E. Woods Jr PHD (a convert by the way). This book will not convert you so you do not have to worry but it is an excellent testimony to the role the Church has played in society.

Cinette:)*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top