K
kainosktisis
Guest
Yes & no. That was my experience as a former Protestant.
I believe you are genuine and really mean what you are saying. I agree that ideally it would be great to have one central authority. I once had a Catholic priest tell me that the Reformation was inevitable because of the corruption within the Church hierarchy. Centuries have passed and here we are…There are huge problems in both camps.It is more interesting to discuss why this number is so hard to pin down, whatever it is. What drove me from evangelicalism back to the church was the lack of any authoritative interpreter of absolute truth. Without sacred tradition or the magisterium anchoring them, each theological disagreement can lead to a new church. They mean so well and try so hard but division is endemic in a world with no real authority. The divisiveness flies in the face of Jesus’ impassioned prayer before going to the cross in John 14 “that they might be one”. It breaks my heart.
Could you expound a bit on your thoughts?Yes & no. That was my experience as a former Protestant.
I am sorry if it felt that way. I want all to be One.feels like it is coming from a desire to dominate or put down non-Catholics.
Love bears all things. The virtue of hope is a beautiful thing to experience.Yes, I agree, but it can sure feel like an uphill battle with all of the differences & challenges.
Thanks, I appreciate that.Wannano:![]()
I am sorry if it felt that way. I want all to be One.feels like it is coming from a desire to dominate or put down non-Catholics.
You’re welcome! <3Thank you for that.
I tend to agree that all churches have some error, however, I have never thought about starting my own!I had a great-great-Uncle who communed with no one save his own family and held services in his home. He believed that every local church was in error. He led an unincorporated denomination of literally a few people. I’m sure there are many examples like that.
Do you want me to lie and say Catholcism is perfectly united. A few days on these threads should clear that from anyones mind if they even welcomed the thought!Do you want me to lie and say that Protestantism is perfectly united?
If normal mainline Protestants get put in the same catagory as “Hidden Buddhist believers in Christ” (Which I never knew was a thing and even 9 denominations) and that’s how it should be counted then I would guess there could even be 100 000 “Protestant denominations”. And you would be very correct. But that just so much more proves that number means absolutely nothing in any sense.Just because some have a ‘hard time calling Protestant’ those certain denominations, does not inherently make them non-Protestant.
I would think your statement would also apply to Catholics. Very few legitimate Christian non-Catholic churches or individuals interpret the Bible without using some inherited frame of reference .Every protestant is their own denomination if they’re trying to interpret the Bible on their own with no frame of reference as provided by the very organization to compile the Bible; the Church.
Actually, quite true. outside of mainline Protestant (Lutheran, Episcopalian, Methodist, etc) and the Assemblies of God and Church of Christ in the Pentecostal/fundamentalist camp, every church with a name like the Church of the Nazarene, the Church of Jesus Christ, Incorporated, and all the others with no affiliation to an organized group, are a denomination unto themself. And even among the mainline denominations, Baptist, Lutheran, Methodist, there are splinter churches that follow their own path. Every “minister” who graduates from a “Bible” college is free to form his own congregation/denomination and preach the “gospel” his or her own way.I’m a proponent of the several thousand number because I consider each non-denominational Church pastor to be the leader of his/her own denomination.