P
PetraG
Guest
She wrote: We generally get along really well and only fight once a month or less, but when we do, he pulls the “I’m the head of this household and you will do what I say” card. He doesn’t have a good role marriage to pull from (mom and stepdad are divorced), and he admitted he’s been trying to figure it out on his own. He told me to go to my room yesterday and that he has authority over me.
She felt he was putting her in her place and showing his dominance. Whatever he meant by what he said, that is how she felt, and she has every reason to believe that this is precisely how he meant for her to feel when he said it because he explicitly said he was giving her that direction because he meant to wield his authority.
That is not the kind of message to give to one’s wife. Our Lord said: “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and the great ones make their authority over them felt. But it shall not be so among you. Rather, whoever wishes to be great among you shall be your servant; whoever wishes to be first among you shall be your slave. Just so, the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Matt 20:25-28) So when St. Paul said that the relationship between a husband and a wife is a sign of Christ and His Bride the Church, that is not going to involve any kind of subjugation of one by the other; to start out the famous 5th chapter of Ephesians, St. Paul said: Be subordinate to one another out of reverence for Christ. (Eph 5:21) and then in the next verse said Wives should be subordinate to their husbands as to the Lord. (Eph 5:22) How is this possible? It is possible because the leadership of Christ was not what the World thinks leadership is.
Yes, though: As you imply, we only know what “cards” he plays, not which ones she plays. People do resort to some pretty ludicrous arguments and manipulative ploys during marital spats; that is not atypical. Sometimes the difficult conversations are put off by a bit too long only to erupt when both spouses are too tired and irrational to do the topic justice.
She felt he was putting her in her place and showing his dominance. Whatever he meant by what he said, that is how she felt, and she has every reason to believe that this is precisely how he meant for her to feel when he said it because he explicitly said he was giving her that direction because he meant to wield his authority.
That is not the kind of message to give to one’s wife. Our Lord said: “You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and the great ones make their authority over them felt. But it shall not be so among you. Rather, whoever wishes to be great among you shall be your servant; whoever wishes to be first among you shall be your slave. Just so, the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Matt 20:25-28) So when St. Paul said that the relationship between a husband and a wife is a sign of Christ and His Bride the Church, that is not going to involve any kind of subjugation of one by the other; to start out the famous 5th chapter of Ephesians, St. Paul said: Be subordinate to one another out of reverence for Christ. (Eph 5:21) and then in the next verse said Wives should be subordinate to their husbands as to the Lord. (Eph 5:22) How is this possible? It is possible because the leadership of Christ was not what the World thinks leadership is.
Yes, though: As you imply, we only know what “cards” he plays, not which ones she plays. People do resort to some pretty ludicrous arguments and manipulative ploys during marital spats; that is not atypical. Sometimes the difficult conversations are put off by a bit too long only to erupt when both spouses are too tired and irrational to do the topic justice.
Last edited: