J
JoyToBeCatholic
Guest
…as a parent, I would view something troubling in my relationship with my children if they didn’t feel they could come directly to me for their needs.
I agree to a point but. . .as a parent, I would view something troubling in my relationship with my children if they didn’t feel they could come directly to me for their needs.
You can ask a saint for any holy thing that you might ask another human to do.Ok, the prayer issue is slightly o.t., but I would like to clarify something:
Is it okay to pray (ask) a saint for anything other than intercessory prayer?
What is the purpose of asking another human to pray for you?IOW, what is the purpose of praying to/asking a saint anyway? If God is my Father, why am I asking other people for things? If I need something from Daddy, why can’t I confidently go directly to Him? Why in heaven’s name do I need to ask a friend to ask my Father for me???
Thanks
How about if several of your children came to you with the same need?…as a parent, I would view something troubling in my relationship with my children if they didn’t feel they could come directly to me for their needs.
This is incorrect. Vatican Council II, for example, was not a one-man (pope) show. No Church Councils were.The pope, no? He has the final say. The orthodox believe it is the bishops, but the RCC - the Pope. Correct me if wrong.
That answer doesn’t move the discussion forward at all. How can one know which “bible-only” teachings are correct, and which are false teachings espoused by those who “refuse to obey the Bible”? The plain fact is, one can’t know. One can only apply their own human judgement, and human judgement is capable of (stupendous) error.It tells me there are many people, Catholic and non-Catholic that refuse to obey the Bible (as there are millions of people who do not wish to obey the CC). It tells me there are professing Christians in all walks of life, culture and denominations who make the Bible mean what they want it to.
Nobody is suggesing that God is limited. What is suggested (and you would agree, I’m sure) is that God has given us one surest path. We say it’s the Church (which includes the bible). You say it’s just the bible.He had no sacraments or church either. God is supreme. He can do as He pleases. He’s not limited to the church.
Where do you find that?I definately have a mental block with this and I’m trying to understand…
Scripture itself says it is “sufficient”.
One of the standards used to determine which books should make up the canon is whether they were accepted by Jesus and the apostles, and whether the early fathers accepted them as such. It is the church that decided which books should be included in the canon, not the other way around.Ok, but since the church deemed certain apostolic writings to be canon (a rule of measure), and since Scripture even declares itself to be “sufficient”, why should we accept things outside of it?
There are differerent levels of infallibility recognized in the church. If you search this thread, you can find some good posts on it.I suppose the teachings of the church (canon law - theres that word “canon” again) are on par with Scripture then? Why not just add them to the Bible then? I’m sincerely asking, not trying to be wise…
Sure. Unless you left them with a babysitter to whom you had given authority to dispense popcorn during “Finding Nemo”.…as a parent, I would view something troubling in my relationship with my children if they didn’t feel they could come directly to me for their needs.
No it is not.No, it is exactly the same word.
My question is this…
What part(s) of the Bible do you believe is(are) absolutely true and God-inspired?
This is so funny, b/c when I got home from getting my taxes done, my children were watching “Finding Nemo”Sure. Unless you left them with a babysitter to whom you had given authority to dispense popcorn during “Finding Nemo”.
Forgive my stupidity, but what is “Deuts?”I believe everything that is essential to our salvation has been preserved sans Deuts.
Deuterocanonicals. The books in dispute between Catholics and Protestants.Forgive my stupidity, but what is “Deuts?”
First, their prayer might be more correctly described as worship. Here on earth, we worship, praise, give thanks, offer petitions and seek answers to questions.But why would someone, already perfected (in Heaven) need to do this? They already have a relationship with God (now much closer than ours) and, obviously they recognize(d) their dependence on God. Why do they need to pray at all?
No wonder you are looking elsewhere if you believe this! This is just false.The CC says I can’t understand the Bible.
What it says is that, if there appears to be a contradiction, then it is a shortage of understanding. A lot of us tend to lack humility, and think that we can grasp things as well or better than the persons to whom God chose to reveal them.So I have to choose to put my trust in its magisterium to know the truth (according to the CC). I have to make a choice. I have to make an evaluation of both and decide which to follow. Go against my conscience and biblical convictions and believe the high claims of the church, or…
Don’t you have any friends who are pious? I read in your other post that only religious you knew seemed so? Perhaps you have passionate protestant brothers and sisters? Are you saying there is NO ONE in you life whose prayer life you admire? NO ONE of whom you would say “will you pray with me”?Ok, the prayer issue is slightly o.t., but I would like to clarify something:
Is it okay to pray (ask) a saint for anything other than intercessory prayer? IOW, what is the purpose of praying to/asking a saint anyway? If God is my Father, why am I asking other people for things? If I need something from Daddy, why can’t I confidently go directly to Him? Why in heaven’s name do I need to ask a friend to ask my Father for me???
Thanks
Of course! :doh2: Hey, it’s late, for cryin’ out loud!Deuterocanonicals. The books in dispute between Catholics and Protestants.
Of course! :doh2: Hey, it’s late, for cryin’ out loud!
Yes, I suppose I should, but like I said in the thread, I came back to the CC; felt I had enough faith (at the time) to take the church’s word for it. In so doing, I have to avoid the Bible like the plague though or I know I’m going to be plagued with doubt much worse than I currently do and wind up leaving again. At this time I’m trying to avoid that and understand better these Catholic things, and so avoiding reading scripture. Naturally, though, there’s plenty of Scripture fresh in my memory that is eating away at my conscience.The point of my question is this:
In an earlier post (maybe on another thread) I recall you saying you didn’t want to read scripture for fear it would make you doubt your conscience. (If I’m misquoting, I sincerely apologize.) So, if you believe the Bible is indeed God-inspired, then shouldn’t you go to it, instead of avoiding it?
Well, it’s not that simple when we disagree aboaut the whole apostolic succession and continuity in the faith thing.To expedite my point without drawing it out into several threads, I’m simply trying to say that if the God-inspired Bible tells us what Church Jesus established, and to whom He gave the authority to shepherd His flock, then why would you leave that Church?
You see this scripture referring to the chuch, others see it as referring to the world.I fully understand that there are wonderful people outside of the Church, and it is very disappointing that the people of His Church don’t always act the way they should, but that does not change the fact that it is the Church He established for us. And don’t forget, Jesus said that the wheat would grow with the tares, and they would be separated in the end.
And our prayers on earth aren’t? There definately is a difference in how we view prayer.First, their prayer might be more correctly described as worship.
Any form of prayer I can think of is a type of worship. If it’s a prayer of praise I would hope it is only directed to God. If it’s a prayer of petition, again, I can’t understand why it would be directed to anyone other than God. It seems the whole purpose of our praying in the first place is to acknowledge God’s sovereignty. I don’t want to bypss that to pray to something or someone else.Here on earth, we worship, praise, give thanks, offer petitions and seek answers to questions.
No, my parents weren’t practicing Catholics (at least, they weren’t after I was born). My dad was almost a priest though, yet my whole family abandoned God after the death of a child in our family.Of course, they also pray for us…they don’t need to pray for themselves nor do we need to pray for them.
Saints in heaven and the saints on Earth can also pray for the souls in Purgatory.
I’m told that the souls in Purgatory can pray for us but not for themselves…that’s why they need our prayers.
Didn’t your mother ever tell you to “Offer it up for the souls in purgatory who have no one to pray for them.”
:tiphat:
That’s what the JWs tried to convince meNo wonder you are looking elsewhere if you believe this! This is just false.
What it says is that, if there appears to be a contradiction, then it is a shortage of understanding.
I don’t claim to have the corner market on the interpretation of the Bible. Few churches do make that claim, and the ones that do? Well, that could be seen as a lack of humility too, no?A lot of us tend to lack humility, and think that we can grasp things as well or better than the persons to whom God chose to reveal them.