G
gazelam
Guest
Please provide a reference for the “devil’s lie” quote. Thanks.Joseph Fielding Smith, when asked if the LDS Church had Smith’s seer stone said no, and further that the idea Smith ever used one was a devil’s lie.
Please provide a reference for the “devil’s lie” quote. Thanks.Joseph Fielding Smith, when asked if the LDS Church had Smith’s seer stone said no, and further that the idea Smith ever used one was a devil’s lie.
Joseph found with the gold plates “a curious instrument which the ancients called Urim and Thummim, which consisted of two transparent stones set in a rim of a bow fastened to a breastplate.”
oseph also used an egg-shaped, brown rock for translating called a seer stone. The translating was done at Peter Whitmer’s home, a friend of the Prophet’s where Oliver Cowdery, Emma Smith (Joseph’s wife), one of the Whitmers, or Martin Harris wrote down the words spoken by the Prophet as soon as they were made known to him.
This is some next-level Harry Potter fanfiction, right here, except that the “Seer Stone” sounds more like Sauron’s One Ring. Seems appropriate, that.Martin Harris said that on the seer stone “sentences would appear and were read by the Prophet and written by [the one writing them down] and when finished [that person] would say ‘written;’ and if correctly written, the sentence would disappear and another take its place; but if not written correctly it remained until corrected, so that the translation was just as it was engraven on the plates.”
Forget that, I want some gold plates, and my own planet. Except I’d name it something a lot cooler than “Kolob”.Treasure huntin’ Joe Smith said we all have seer stones.
If someone send me mine, I’ll go Mormon and be the most devout example you’ve ever seen.
Totally fiction. What’s funny is that he said, "but if not written correctly it remained until corrected, so that the translation was just as it was engraven on the plates.” So if it remained until it was corrected then why did the church have to make thousands of additional corrections?This is some next-level Harry Potter fanfiction, right here, except that the “Seer Stone” sounds more like Sauron’s One Ring. Seems appropriate, that.
They’re correct until they suddenly get the Mormon church in hot water, at which point they were never actually correct at all, because what a prophet says after they’re not around anymore doesn’t really matter or something. It’s all a little convoluted, but very convenient for being able to say whatever you want and not get called out for it later.I guess the correct corrections weren’t so correct after all, correct?
Not just early ritual.Many of the early rituals looking suspiciously like Masonic Rituals…
I think their beliefs are anything but true, but it doesn’t feel right to watch what they want to keep private.They used to be secret. But thanks to the miracle of hidden cameras:
There are videos all over YouTube for your enjoyment.
he had certainly left them by then.I don’t know what it means to revoke a baptism. In all the years I was Mormon I never heard of such a thing. The only thing I can think of is that he was possibly excommunicated for apostasy.
Smith was a freemason . . .While the evidence is quite damming, I also tend to give a pass to the Mormons regarding the similarities with Masonry. It’s possible that they both came from the same root and not that one was copied. And that’s not to say that I don’t think it was copied. It likely was.
Seems to me “running for the hills” would bring them closer to God.It doesn’t make them draw closer to God. It should make them run for the hills. One of the criteria that marks a cult is secret ceremonies. Why all the secrecy? Jesus did nothing in secret.
I know that, as does anyone who has ever been a Mormon. That’s no secret. It’s also not a secret that the endowment ceremony came into being shortly after Joseph became a Mason, so the coincidences are indeed, suspicious. All I am saying is that I hold out the POSSIBILITY that both the Mormon endowment ceremony and the Masonic ceremony, whatever you call it, may have come from the same source. Not likely, but possible.Smith was a freemason . . .
Mormons have a number of secret ceremonies in the Mormon temples–as opposed to the Mormon church houses. They perform baptisms for the dead, washings and anointings, the endowment which contains things like secret signs and tokens, covenants, and the true order of prayer, marriages and sealings, second anointings, and in addition, the Salt Lake Temple has a room called the Holy of Holies where the president spends a bit of time and invites others to visit on occasion. Other, even more secret ordinances go on there, and it is believed that the Holy of Holies is where the president meets and talks with God.Please forgive me if this is derailing the thread (or did that train go off days ago?), but I’ve heard scuttlebutt that the Mormons have secret ceremonies, the content of which is only for full-fledged members or something.
Is there truth to that?
There is. And there’s been a bit of fuss about the tax-exempt nature of some of those properties where these things take place since they’re effectively open to members only rather than the general public.Please forgive me if this is derailing the thread (or did that train go off days ago?), but I’ve heard scuttlebutt that the Mormons have secret ceremonies, the content of which is only for full-fledged members or something.
Is there truth to that?