How to deal with "Every religion thinks it's the right one"

  • Thread starter Thread starter NextElement
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why aren’t you honestly attempting to seek the truth, rather than simply attempting to elevate your particular religion above others?
Because nothing else comes close to expressing the supreme Beauty, Love and Life that is the Cause, the Source of this wondrous creation, and offering us the Way to return to where we were meant to be.

View attachment 20003
 
Why aren’t you honestly attempting to seek the truth, rather than simply attempting to elevate your particular religion above others?
Your question is a loaded one.

It presumes the truth has not been found. A person would only continue to seek under the presumption that the truth hasn’t yet been found which is why they continue in their search.

Your assumption is that every religion has not come to the truth and therefore all continue on the quest. But if only “seeking” is ever allowed then, by default, no “finding” can ever result.

Anyone claiming to have found the truth will always be met by “why aren’t you honestly attempting to seek?” and any attempted explanations will be answered with your secondary cudgel that they are merely attempting to “elevate” their particular truth above others.

It is a no-win proposition for your contender either way.

Thus, loaded question.

In short, your position extols feigned ignorance as the only tolerable position.
 
Because I have sought the truth, and concluded that Catholicism is the truth. Why would I not want to evangelize and elevate it, which I believe it deserves?
In the OP, you stated: “This comes up SO often for me when discussing religion with non-believers. They always eventually go to the “Well every religion thinks it’s right and all the others are wrong!”… For me it’s hard to keep the conversation going after that. It’s like, yeah they do, but why does that stop you from finding your own truth?

This is exactly what propels me to find my own truth. In fact, everyone must do that for him or her self.
 
Because I have sought the truth, and concluded that Catholicism is the truth. Why would I not want to evangelize and elevate it, which I believe it deserves?
If you seek the truth and find the truth then the truth set you another free instead leaving you in trap when you are trying to convince other people.
 
Because nothing else comes close to expressing the supreme Beauty, Love and Life that is the Cause, the Source of this wondrous creation, and offering us the Way to return to where we were meant to be.
View attachment 20003
I doubt as I think everybody striving in different belief are claiming so. No one can claim that the beauty is good criteria for approaching the truth and there is no fact proving that the reality at the edge is beautiful.
 
I wonder, fellow Christian, why would you ever discuss religion with non-believers? We all know what St. Fracis of Assisi said…

Be well -

Zachary
Well, because one of the marks of the Church is that it is a missionary Church and all Christians are called to live and preach the Gospel. Discussing the faith with non believers is what Christ has commanded us to do when he told us to go forth and teach the Gospel. That’s why I discuss my faith with non believers. So, what did St. Francis say?
 
Most religions have stories, traditions, and rituals. And all claim to have the truth.
True, and it is also true that you ignored the remainder of my post (below).

The truth is embodied and handed down through story, tradition and ritual. Given all choices possible it is our nature to seek and find the source(s) of truth that have withstood the scrutiny of time. In the Catholic tradition we find saints, mystics, theologians, scientists, and doctors of the church that from all time profess heroic virtues that are not subject to the passing whims of any one generation. This trait is born in Judiasm and is held sacred in the magesterium (authentic teaching) that transcends the last 2000 years.

Do you have another equivalent example that we should consider?
 
In the OP, you stated: “This comes up SO often for me when discussing religion with non-believers. They always eventually go to the “Well every religion thinks it’s right and all the others are wrong!”… For me it’s hard to keep the conversation going after that. It’s like, yeah they do, but why does that stop you from finding your own truth?

This is exactly what propels me to find my own truth. In fact, everyone must do that for him or her self.
We have ourselves a postmodern relativist here! :rolleyes:
 
If you seek the truth and find the truth then the truth set you another free instead leaving you in trap when you are trying to convince other people.
We don’t share the truth because we’re “trapped”, we share the truth because we love the truth and want others to find it.
 
We don’t share the truth because we’re “trapped”, we share the truth because we love the truth and want others to find it.
The truth has to be sought instead of to be told as each individual is responsible for this duty. Our words won’t affect you as far you strive on what you believe. I was a very religious person before and I found that radical doubt when it comes to religion is the first step toward finding the truth. Are you ready for that?
 
If you seek the truth and find the truth then the truth set you another free instead leaving you in trap when you are trying to convince other people.
If I’m happy and decide to try to make others happy as well, does that mean I’m not really happy?

If I know the truth and try to share it with others, does that change the fact that it’s the truth?
 
The truth has to be sought instead of to be told as each individual is responsible for this duty. Our words won’t affect you as far you strive on what you believe. I was a very religious person before and I found that radical doubt when it comes to religion is the first step toward finding the truth. Are you ready for that?
By sharing the truth, we help people find it.
 
I was a very religious person before and I found that radical doubt when it comes to religion is the first step toward finding the truth. Are you ready for that?
I don’t believe it’s considered o.k. for you to be invited to this web site for the purpose of enccouraging Catholics to radically doubt their faith on the presumption they don’t already have the truth.

Sounds like you are urging them to re-invent a crooked wheel like the one you are riding on. :rolleyes:
 
The truth has to be sought instead of to be told as each individual is responsible for this duty. Our words won’t affect you as far you strive on what you believe. I was a very religious person before and I found that radical doubt when it comes to religion is the first step toward finding the truth. Are you ready for that?
Have you been relating the truths you have found?
You are going down the wrong road.
You will not be making progress continuing down that path.
Progress wil happen when you turn back.
Get back to scripture. The New Testament is wonderful - read and reread it; pray.
 
The idea is to seek the truth and know the truth and truth set you free.
What exactly is “the truth” and how would you recognize it without knowing what it is you are seeking for? Your insistence that there is truth to be found carries with it a presumption that the truth is already known and merely re-cognized. This was Plato’s point and the reason he posited forms. Neoplatonists have followed suit.

Aristotelians. Thomists and Scholastics posit the intelligibility of reality as mediated by the intelligible form (actuality) that material (potentiality) is endowed with by Actus Purus, the Unmoved Mover (aka God)

The problem with dismissing these a priori just to search for an undefinable, unknown “truth” is that you can offer no reason to think that your “truth” is even necessary to your world view. You can offer no explanation for why you think truth can be found or even how you would recognize it when it has been found.

If “truth” is merely externally grasped, there is no necessary connection to the internal consciousness that grasps it. How does the internal intellect know when truth is at hand? What is the mechanism by which truth is known to be truth?
 
Bahman #96
I was a very religious person before and I found that radical doubt when it comes to religion is the first step toward finding the truth.
Not only are the facts of Jesus miracles recorded by His own Apostles who were present – Saints Matthew and John were companions of Christ, but Saints Mark and Luke lived in constant contact with His contemporaries.

His miracles “were so frequent, the eyewitnesses so numerous, and the evidence so stark, that not even Christ’s enemies disputed the fact of their occurrence. Instead they ascribed them to the power of the devil, or defied Him to perform another one in His own favour.” (See Mt 12:24; 27:39-42; Jn 11:47). Apologetics and Catholic Doctrine, Sheehan/Joseph, Saint Austin Press, 2001, p 104].

No other religious founder claimed to be the one God – not Mohammed of Islam, not in Hinduism, not in Buddhism, not in Taoism, not in Confucianism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top