How will a devout Catholic handle the job as President of the US?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zynxensar
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not to start a fight but much of the modern Church is this way. My dad said as a child the thought of Holy Communion in the hand was laughable. “How could we receive God in unconsecrated hands?” And yet here we are. Now the debate over allowing the divorced and remarried to return to Holy Communion. 2000 years of unbroken tradition forbidding it now the push to overturn it rages. Your assessment is absolutely spot on.
 
You’re just on the “right” side of the line per your views.
Well, being Catholic we know that we’re right.
So your goal should probably be “convert Americans to Catholicism” rather than “force the Catholic view on abortion upon non-catholics”.
It would be a multi-pronged operation:
  1. Legally make changes as quickly as possible
  2. Achieve media dominance and promote desired changes
  3. Explain why desired changes are good
Essentially, take the current strategy for promoting evil and instead promote good.
 
Is ripping your neighbour to pieces, limb by limb, not such an important issue?
Frankly, no. Pro-life fanatics have a one-issue mentality. If you ask me, (which you did…) that’s precisely what the Devil is looking for–people who ignore every other evil in the world to focus on just one.

And what precisely would the US accomplish if it made abortion illegal? Would it prevent abortion? Of course not. And what countries would the US be standing shoulder to shoulder with if they made abortion illegal?
El Salvador, Malta, the Vatican, Chile, the Dominican Republic, and Nicaragua. Leaving the Vatican and Malta aside, those are not countries (except for Chile) renowned for their human rights records, or for providing their people with a reasonable standard of living. And you want the US to join them? Really?
 
Frankly, no. Pro-life fanatics have a one-issue mentality. If you ask me, (which you did…)
So the lives of 900,000 innocent children killed each year by abortion in the USA don’t matter?

Was it a person then who jumped inside Elizabeth’s womb when Mary greeted Elizabeth?
 
Last edited:
So the lives of 900,000 innocent children killed each year by abortion in the USA don’t matter?
Sure. But millions are dying every day–which could be prevented, and a lot more are suffering. Your focus is extremely narrow.

I’d be a lot happier if you wrote:

We must feed the hungry, cure the sick, provide jobs for those who can work, and provide livable incomes for everyone. We should also make it attractive to pregnant mothers to have children and bring them up as happy, healthy, and safe human beings rather than to feel that they need to have an abortion to survive.
 
Last edited:
And what precisely would the US accomplish if it made abortion illegal? Would it prevent abortion? Of course not.
You can’t legislate morality but doing absolutely nothing is far worse.
And what countries would the US be standing shoulder to shoulder with if they made abortion illegal?
A more absurd statement has never been written! We don’t need support to do the right thing. The US doesn’t need to compare itself to other countries. We must do what is Right and Just.
 
Last edited:
Not sure I get this, we abort the baby to prevent his suffering and death?
We must feed the hungry, cure the sick, provide jobs for those who can work, and provide livable incomes for everyone. We should also make it attractive to pregnant mothers to have children and bring them up as happy, healthy, and safe human beings rather than to feel that they need to have an abortion to survive.
I want all of that also. But there will always be the poor, there will always be suffering and yes death. Suffering has redemptive qualities. After all, God the Father allowed his only Son to suffer.
 
A more absurd statement has never been written! We don’t need support to do the right thing. The US doesn’t need to compare itself to other countries. We just need to do what is Right and Just.
If you think Nicaragua, El Salvador, and the Dominican Republic are shining examples of how governments can best provide for their citizens, then good for you.

As I’ve written in this forum many times, there are all sorts of reasons that abortion should NOT be made illegal.

But the same people (yes, I’m generalizing) who are fanatical anti-abortion advocates are the same ones who are content to ignore the causes of abortion. Again, I’ve posted links before. The Guttmacher Institute did a survey a few years ago of why people have abortions. NO woman wakes up and thinks “Gee, I think having an abortion would be fun!” If you want to reduce abortions, great. I’m all for it. Attack the REASONS women have abortions. Why are their fewer abortions in Europe than in the US, in percentage terms? If you were a pregnant woman in France, what benefits would the government offer you? If you were pregnant in the US, would be be offered the same benefits? Hmmmm…
 
I want all of that also. But there will always be the poor, there will always be suffering and yes death. Suffering has redemptive qualities. After all, God the Father allowed his only Son to suffer.
But if you allow people who have babies to watch those babies die of malnutrition, disease, etc. and grow up with little or not future what you are telling those people is “Better to abort that baby now and avoid all that agony.” THAT’S the message that poor women around the world are hearing. And then you’re surprised there are a lot of abortions? Come on.
 
Sure. But millions are dying every day–which could be prevented, and a lot more are suffering. Your focus is extremely narrow.
Around 50 million children die worldwide as a result of abortion. 50 million!

And around 900,000 each year in the USA alone. But you think that quite frankly it doesn’t matter. Children in the womb are your fellow men too, are they not also your neighbours?
 
Last edited:
You can’t legislate morality
But if you make abortion illegal, are you doing exactly that? And not “morality” in general but YOUR version of “morality.” And if you go on and on about the Catholic Church, let me remind you this is not the Vatican. The US has millions of Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and yes, atheists. They deserve to have THEIR morality respected too.
 
But you think that quite frankly it doesn’t matter.
No, I don’t. It matters. But it’s NOT the only issue, nor do I think it’s the most important issue. Again, if I were the devil (as you probably think I am), I would be only too happy to have people focus on one moral issue rather than the whole range of moral issues. Basically, you’re letting me win by forfeit.
 
So what role does contraception play? Surely, most secular people wouldn’t like losing that either…
 
If a devout Catholic became President of the United States, how will he go about being President while following God’s Law?

There may be some actions such as:
  • Abolition of abortion
  • Contraceptives are illegal
A lot of people got the impression that John Kerry was “devout” due to his frequent attendance at mass - at least when he was running for president.

And he wouldn’t have done anything about abortions or contraception.
 
No, I don’t. It matters. But it’s NOT the only issue, nor do I think it’s the most important issue.
Well a few posts ago I asked you, “Is ripping your neighbour to pieces, limb by limb, not such an important issue?” and you replied, “Frankly, no”.

I have never said it was the only issue, but it is, in terms of the numbers of innocent children dying, the most important issue. A child in the womb is as much as person as a person outside the womb (and vice versa).

Think on the number 900,000 innocent children killed by abortion in the USA each year. 900,000. That is a collosal level of slaughter of innocents.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top