C
CilladeRoma
Guest
You obviously don’t know your tattoo history either. Often times they were done on warriors, nobles or even Catholic men(and women) who made a pilgrimage to the Holy Land.
To (piggy) back up Cillade’s point about this, here’s an article over the tattoos. They’re still done today. The tattooist in question even has a website you can Google.Often times they were done on warriors, nobles or even Catholic men(and women) who made a pilgrimage to the Holy Land.
No…“a little out of date”…Tattoos are …must I say my opinion only…they are attention-getting…and I sort of think “less” of the person displaying one…it’s just an automatic feeling towards them…it is so unnecessary…I think your perception of what’s normal in the workplace is a little out of date. If you don’t like them and wouldn’t want one, that’s totally fine. But you should recognize that they’re no longer considered weird or trashy per se.
That might be your preference. It’s not everyone’s. No one is saying that tattoos are obligatory. If you don’t care for them, don’t get one.Okay, some tattoos memorialize a loved one. Or they mark an important event.
Why get it marked on your skin? Why not – write a poem? Plant a memorial tree? Commission a work of art?
Are you not aware that they no longer have that connotation? The societal norms around these things have changed. No one sees someone with a tattoo and automatically assumes the person is disreputable or a criminal anymore.Do people not know that tattoos have a taint of association with a criminal / biker / low-class element of society, although tattoos are somewhat more acceptable today? You seriously don’t know that they have that history?
I would say honestly, that when I see someone with a tattoo, and it’s someone who I might have an ongoing relationship with (neighbor, co-worker, etc), it just introduces a little seed of doubt about that person’s judgment. The more tattoos, or the more obvious and huge the tattoos are, then the bigger the seeds of doubt about that person’s good judgment. That’s all, and obviously it’s just my opinion.Not sure if you’re being sarcastic, but the issue is that you seem to think less of people with tattoos, or make uncharitable assumptions about them. That’s wrong and not very Christian, frankly.
Again, it’s totally fine to say “I don’t care for tattoos and wouldn’t want one myself.” What’s not cool is to say, “I assume people with tattoos are trashy and don’t belong in respectable jobs.”
I say go for it. I have quite a few tattoos but only one is religious based. Here it is.So in the next year or so I am seriously considering getting a tattoo. I have read some tattoos are okay while others are not. I am planning on getting Jesus and Mary on both sides of my chest, and either a cross or the Holy Spirit in the middle. This tattoo would cover my entire chest, is this something that God would disapprove of?
Sure, but you should be cognizant of your own prejudices. We all have them, but we don’t have to consciously reinforce them.Everyone makes judgements (or evaluations of some kind) about other people based on clothes, grooming choices, and other physical cues. People choose to send certain messages.
It’s not a prejudice to evaluate people on the basis of whether or not they have a tattoo. I have a certain lived experience of knowing different people who have tattoos, and I make preliminary evaluations based on my previous encounters with people who have tattoos. People are not born with tattoos, or don’t involuntarily get tattoos, it’s the individual’s choice to get one. It’s a grooming choice.27lw:
Sure, but you should be cognizant of your own prejudices. We all have them, but we don’t have to consciously reinforce them.Everyone makes judgements (or evaluations of some kind) about other people based on clothes, grooming choices, and other physical cues. People choose to send certain messages.
We also have to acknowledge that the “messages” people send via clothes or grooming are just a reflection of society’s perception of the clothes/grooming/whatever. That societal perception can change. There was a time when a woman wearing pants was considered risqué, and people might assume that the woman was sending “I’m edgy/nonconformist/modern” signals. Now no one makes any particular assumption about a woman wearing jeans. Similarly, societal perceptions in general around tattoos have shifted. What was once associated with convicts and bikers is now pretty uncontroversial.
We usually go through several phases in life. Some of us have phases where we are more insecure and seek recognition and approval from others. Tattoos might be involved in such a phase, that is true. But don’t forget that boasting or displaying an opinion is quite prevalent in very conservative circles as well. Just using other methods.I am a more conservative individual and do not like attention of any kind with the exception of being recognized for a job well done at my job. I also am not one to boast about or display my opinion on a tee shirt and never with a visible tattoo!
In that environment other methods for displaying opinions and group affiliation are used. But if you think such markers aren’t used you are seriously mistaken.Have not seen any at operas…banks
Are those special in any kind?…engineering companies…
Good for you. Personally I can’t stand those buttondown shirts. Or american suits.not for me…I love the “preppy” look…nothing but CLASS!
I think this is skewed towards tattoos that are visible in the workplace. Obviously if you have a neck tattoo people are going to find that a little sketchy. Most of these people who “disapprove” of tattoos probably don’t realize how many people they know who actually have them, because they don’t see these people in beach attire.An interesting article. The people most likely to “disapprove” of tattoos? Older people and more educated people. Sounds to me like bosses, CEOs, university department heads, etc.