F
Fairwinds
Guest
if you don’t take “obligation” seriously, its natural you think Jesus gives out “Get Out Of Mass” cards for passing Go.…
Do you REALLY think that’s how Jesus would have handled it?
if you don’t take “obligation” seriously, its natural you think Jesus gives out “Get Out Of Mass” cards for passing Go.…
Do you REALLY think that’s how Jesus would have handled it?
Do you really not get that the entire point of Catholicism is that Jesus gives us a “get out of Hell free” card? We achieve Heaven not through any merit of our own, but ONLY because of his sacrifice on the Cross. We don’t earn it by “checking the boxes”.if you don’t take “obligation” seriously, its natural you think Jesus gives out “Get Out Of Mass” cards for passing Go.
in John 2:27?And he said to them: The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath.
I’m not going to respond to argumentative straw man questions. the church teaches that Mass attendance is an obligation, excusable only for a couple of reasons.Do you really not get that the entire point of Catholicism is that Jesus gives us a “get out of Hell free” card?..
Catholics are not universalists and there is no 27th verse in the 2nd Chapter of the Gospel of John.Do you really not get that the entire point of Catholicism is that Jesus gives us a “get out of Hell free” card? We achieve Heaven not through any merit of our own, but ONLY because of his sacrifice on the Cross. We don’t earn it by “checking the boxes”.
Is Mass important? ABSOLUTELY! Are other things sometimes more important? Yes, Jesus specifically said so in John 2:27.
BTW, what do YOU think Jesus meant when he said:
in John 2:27?
I stand corrected. It was Mark 2:27. Sorry.Catholics are not universalists and there is no 27th verse in the 2nd Chapter of the Gospel of John.![]()
And he said to them: The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath.
OK, but the quote is still being taken out of context. No one here is disputing that there are legitimate reasons to miss Mass, even while keeping the Lord’s day holy. The question is whether the mutual compassion of marriage requires the Catholic spouse to choose a last-minute demand–this was not a “on the one day a year set aside to do so” that you implied in one of your posts–to attend something else in place of Mass over the obligation to attend Mass. Generally speaking, no, it does not. The Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian life–of ALL Christian life–and there are no substitutes for it. The obligation to attend Mass in honor of the Lord’s day is obligatory because the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is that necessary to the Christian life. This is not about Catholics being better than Protestants. For all we know, there are Protestant services in some particular place that are more reverent and full of better Christians than the Catholic Masses in the same locale. No, this is about the Mass itself, in spite of the faults of those who may celebrate it at any particular time or in any particular place, being beyond any other form of worship, so far beyond as to be beyond compare, and that is not up for debate.I stand corrected. It was Mark 2:27. Sorry.
I didn’t imply it. The OP stated it.OK, but the quote is still being taken out of context. No one here is disputing that there are legitimate reasons to miss Mass, even while keeping the Lord’s day holy. The question is whether the mutual compassion of marriage requires the Catholic spouse to choose a last-minute demand–this was not a “on the one day a year set aside to do so” that you implied in one of your posts
With a date of 15 June, which is in fact, the day before Father’s Day here in the States. Obviously, the OPs husband was trying to mark Father’s Day for his father and presumably the grandfather of the children.My husband thought it would be nice if **tomorrow **we visit his childhood bible church where he was baptized & attend with his father.
Look you’ve already agreed that the obligation to attend Mass is conditional.The Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian life–of ALL Christian life–and there are no substitutes for it. The obligation to attend Mass in honor of the Lord’s day is obligatory because the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is that necessary to the Christian life. This is not about Catholics being better than Protestants. For all we know, there are Protestant services in some particular place that are more reverent and full of better Christians than the Catholic Masses in the same locale. No, this is about the Mass itself, in spite of the faults of those who may celebrate it at any particular time or in any particular place, being beyond any other form of worship, so far beyond as to be beyond compare, and that is not up for debate.
We’re simply haggling over the details. I think this case represents a legitimate reason, you don’t appear to. Fair enough.No one here is disputing that there are legitimate reasons to miss Mass, even while keeping the Lord’s day holy.
I think its much ruder to lecture people on internet etiquette in a post not directed at you than to post an occassional word in caps for emphasis, but obviously, YMMV.On that note, when asking questions of the clergy about the care of souls, I think it would be preferable to avoid words done in all caps. It implies shouting, and this is not something to shout into a priest’s face about.
Catholics don’t observe the Sabbath, we celebrate Sunday, the Lord’s Day. As Catholics, we honor Christ’s invitation to partake in His Eucharistic Service.I don’t think the quote is being taken out of context AT ALL (there I go shouting again!). Jesus’ entire point was we can get so focused on the minute details of “the rules” that we completely disregard the purpose of them. I think that potentially, this is such a case. Especially given the OPs response to the request, with the frowns and shrugs.
Jesus Christ built a Church and the Church was given the Holy Spirit to deliver God’s truth as a living authority. That same Church has already made known God’s conditions on when a person can miss Mass and the OP’s case doesn’t fit into one of those. You and I are not God…we do not get to decide what conditions can allow ourselves and others to miss the Supper of the Lamb.Look you’ve already agreed that the obligation to attend Mass is conditional.
We’re simply haggling over the details. I think this case represents a legitimate reason, you don’t appear to. Fair enough.
I’m sorry but that is incorrect. At best it is half the story. The Church teaches that:Jesus Christ built a Church and the Church was given the Holy Spirit to deliver God’s truth as a living authority. That same Church has already made known God’s conditions on when a person can miss Mass and the OP’s case doesn’t fit into one of those. You and I are not God…we do not get to decide what conditions can allow ourselves and others to miss the Supper of the Lamb.
vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c1a3.htmThe Sunday obligation
2181 The Sunday Eucharist is the foundation and confirmation of all Christian practice. For this reason the faithful are obliged to participate in the Eucharist on days of obligation, unless excused for a serious reason (for example, illness, the care of infants) or dispensed by their own pastor.119 Those who deliberately fail in this obligation commit a grave sin.
Sorry but this backs up what I have written, not what you have written. If it were up to each of us to decide, then there would be no need to get a dispensation from a Priest. You didn’t bold that part.I’m sorry but that is incorrect. At best it is half the story. The Church teaches that:
vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s2c1a3.htm
And it is up to each one of us to define those serious reasons for ourselves. No one can do it for us definitively, we must each of us decide what constitutes a serious reason, then be accountable to God for our definition.
Sure there are guidelines, but at the end of the day we are each responsible for our own decisions.
This bears repeating. Catholics do not observe the Sabbath.Catholics don’t observe the Sabbath, we celebrate Sunday, the Lord’s Day. As Catholics, we honor Christ’s invitation to partake in His Eucharistic Service.
I didn’t bold it cause it doesn’t apply. Its a serious issue OR a pastoral dispensation.Sorry but this backs up what I have written, not what you have written. If it were up to each of us to decide, then there would be no need to get a dispensation from a Priest. You didn’t bold that part.
You don’t need a pastoral dispensation if you have a serious reason.The Sunday obligation
2181 The Sunday Eucharist is the foundation and confirmation of all Christian practice. For this reason the faithful are obliged to participate in the Eucharist on days of obligation, unless excused for a serious reason (for example, illness, the care of infants) or dispensed by their own pastor.119 Those who deliberately fail in this obligation commit a grave sin.
This is a distinction without a difference. Are you seriously trying to assert that Mark 2:27 no longer applies because we observe Sunday instead of Saturday? That’s almost the definition of “legalistic” doncha think?This bears repeating. Catholics do not observe the Sabbath.
I’m sorry you don’t think the faithful have any business defending others from shouting, particularly members of the clergy.I didn’t imply it. The OP stated it.
With a date of 15 June, which is in fact, the day before Father’s Day here in the States. Obviously, the OPs husband was trying to mark Father’s Day for his father and presumably the grandfather of the children.
I don’t think the quote is being taken out of context AT ALL (there I go shouting again!). Jesus’ entire point was we can get so focused on the minute details of “the rules” that we completely disregard the purpose of them. I think that potentially, this is such a case. Especially given the OPs response to the request, with the frowns and shrugs.
Look you’ve already agreed that the obligation to attend Mass is conditional.
We’re simply haggling over the details. I think this case represents a legitimate reason, you don’t appear to. Fair enough.
I think its much ruder to lecture people on internet etiquette in a post not directed at you than to post an occassional word in caps for emphasis, but obviously, YMMV.
Thanks, EasterJoy. It seems that you understand that I had to make the correct choice. I did not think that I had a very good reason to miss Mass, nor did I want to. I’m very happy that we met our Sunday obligation. I teach my kids that Sunday service is not an option, it is obligatory and we work our schedule around Sunday Mass, even when we travel. The kids would have been confused if we had skipped Sunday Mass to attend a Protestant church that we never attend and maybe even thought that I’m not practicing what I preach. That’s not the example I want to set for them. Being a faithful Catholic is not always the popular choice but when I came back to the Catholic Church I knew I was in it with both feet. Even my husband has to admire my devotion.I’m sorry you don’t think the faithful have any business defending others from shouting, particularly members of the clergy.
My point was not that I have a different opinion than yours. My point is that participation in the Mass on Sundays and Holy Days is obligatory for the faithful, and of the reason the OP posted is not one of the reasons given in canon law by which one of the faithful may take it upon himself or herself to dispense of that participation.
Dispensations for other reasons are something for her to take up with her pastor, the person actually appointed to ascertain with her what the spirit of the law requires in her case, and are not for us to give, so it is pointless for us to haggle over it at all. If he cannot be reached and she just has to do the best she can, well, that is for them to work out.
I have a definite advantage over a fallen away cradle Catholic. I’m not a Catholic (yet) but I love the mass. I can’t participate in communion but I’m awed by the respect and holiness of it. Nearly every mass to me is incredible. When possible, usually 1 to 3 times a week, I get up early and go to the 6:30 AM mass because I feel spiritually nourished for participating.I would gladly come back, but I would be lying in confession to say I regret not attending Mass. I disagree with that requirement. I don’t think God is offended by me missing Mass.
No, I don’t think so. This is an issue of understanding the faith, not legalism. The Sabbath didn’t move to Sunday. The Sabbath still exists. We no longer celebrate it or “rest” on that day since it is part of the old law. The previous observance of the Sabbath in the Old Law was to prepare for the mystery of Christ! So yeah, statements in The Bible about the Sabbath do not apply to Sundays – The Lord’s Day – which are expressly distinguished from the Sabbath. The way we celebrate the Lord’s Day is different from the way that the Sabbath was celebrated. Jesus’ Passover fulfilled the Sabbath!This is a distinction without a difference. Are you seriously trying to assert that Mark 2:27 no longer applies because we observe Sunday instead of Saturday? That’s almost the definition of “legalistic” doncha think?