S
steve-b
Guest
Effects don’t make themselves. Give me the cause …Just because something is an effect, that doesn’t mean what effected it was a person. That doesn’t follow logically and should not be a basis for belief.
Effects don’t make themselves. Give me the cause …Just because something is an effect, that doesn’t mean what effected it was a person. That doesn’t follow logically and should not be a basis for belief.
Then show me the causeCould be anything. Doesn’t have to be a God.
Did those that walk away believe 100% that He was God the son? Obviously not. So it was a matter of not feeling they had sufficient knowledge to accept his claim. Others did believe it. They felt they had sufficient knowledge to believe. That’s what I’m trying to say…someone who believes in something feels that they have sufficient knowledge to believe it (whatever it is) while those that don’t feel that they have sufficient knowledge, don’t believe or just accept “it” provisionally. I can’t just “make” myself believe something I don’t believe…and I’ve tried. All I did was lie to myself for a bit.Jesus in the flesh is 100% Jewish, and 100% God the Son.
His disciples spoken of here ( who ultimately don’t believe) are also Jewish
Okay,steve-b:
Did those that walk away believe 100% that He was God the son? Obviously not. So it was a matter of not feeling they had sufficient knowledge to accept his claim. Others did believe it. They felt they had sufficient knowledge to believe. That’s what I’m trying to say…someone who believes in something feels that they have sufficient knowledge to believe it (whatever it is) while those that don’t feel that they have sufficient knowledge, don’t believe or just accept “it” provisionally. I can’t just “make” myself believe something I don’t believe…and I’ve tried. All I did was lie to myself for a bit.Jesus in the flesh is 100% Jewish, and 100% God the Son.
His disciples spoken of here ( who ultimately don’t believe) are also Jewish
Allow me to make one suggestion. It’s not from me but St Peter.Steve, I have. Over and over again. For years. I left faith kicking and screaming. I didn’t want to lose my faith, never asked to lose it, tried looking at other faiths, tried to fake it til I make. Not everyone that doesn’t have faith wanted to be faithless. I still have no answer for what I went through. I still ask. I still try…but I just don’t or can’t or won’t believe…take your pick. I was blindsided by my loss of faith and it was traumatic.
I think I’ve derailed the thread enough. You may PM me if you want to continue. Thank you for the discussion, though. I do appreciate it!
Pascal’s wager assumes a God willing to reward only those who believe without proof. Whereas the alternative seems more likely, that any God engaging deliberately in “divine hiddenness” is doing so to weed out the gullible. After all, they’re also the most likely to be fooled by false gods, and nobody wants someone else taking credit for their own work.Yes this. Pascal’s wager looks more like a roulette wheel…in which case a “bet” on morality and honesty seems the way to go.
Actually the point is, [why / how] do we even know about hell or it’s possibility to go there?poche:
So what? Believing in hell’s existence does not cause it to exist. The point is that if you do not believe in the existence of an option makes it impossible for you to choose that option.Not believing in the existence of Hell doesn’t cause it to not exist. For example, the fact that I don’t believe in your existence doesn’t cause you to cease to exist.
That’s theologically nonsensical…My father’s comments reflected his belief that those in hell were there because they rejected God. Since I don’t believe in him, I can’t reject him, a
Then you’re not an atheist, you’re a nontheistic agnostic.And I don’t deny the possibility of existence of God (or any gods)
I consider myself an atheist (not a theist) because I couldn’t justify my previously held beliefs, having been indoctrinated Catholic. My father’s comments reflected his belief that those in hell were there because they rejected God. Since I don’t believe in him, I can’t reject him, and therefore would not go to hell.
Your father should’ve read Lumen gentium a bit more carefully in seminary, then.It’s just something I had not heard before and was curious if it was a common view or had any theological basis.
So, if there were a point at which you (as a Catholic) said, “yep, this is truth” and then later said, “nah… not so much”… then you kinda fall into this category. There are definitely mitigating factors – “escape clauses” if you will – but your father’s idea that “since you don’t believe in God, you don’t reject Him” isn’t one of them.This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved.
There are atheists of many stripes. They tend to get ticked off when we tell them what (and what not) they believe.Then you’re not an atheist, you’re a nontheistic agnostic.
Atheists emphatically deny even the possibility of a deity existing.