M
mkarzon
Guest
If you say you are not going to hell, then you are guilty of judging, which Jesus condemed in Matt 7:1.
In Rom. 1:5 Paul is referring to he taking the Gospel of grace to all the Gentiles that they, after hearing the message, believe in the Person and work of Jesus Christ for salvation - for Christ’s sake and to His glory. This is what he means by “obedience of faith.” He was not establishing the “Christian religion.” He himself had to abandon the only religion God ever gave, that of the Jews, Judaism. Instead he was sent out with the simple message concerning Christ, to be believed by everybody, anybody, anywhere. All for Christ’s name’s sake!! That’s why it’s called the Gospel of “belief,” Pax. The Lord of Glory had done all the work required to procure and secure man’s salvation. He emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant and became obedient even to death on the cross, becoming the propitiation for the sins of the entire world, and He Himself (not any church) man’s only source of eternal salvation (see, Eph. 2:6-8; 1Jn. 2:2-3; Heb. 5:9).I am especially enamored with Paul’s reference to “the obedience of faith” which Paul mentions in the beginning, middle, and end of Romans. You speak of context, but you have clearly misunderstood the term “obedience of faith.”
Interesting that you highlight the part that says "he who does not obey…, " but this is prefaced and put in context by “he who BELIEVES in the Son HAS eternal life…” The contrast of believe and obey in verse 36 assists in defining the former term. Belief is the obedience to the utterance of God concerning faith in His Son; disobedience is unbelief. The Apostle Paul concurs when he uses the phrase “obedience of faith” in his Epistle to the Romans.For example the apostle John says, “The Father loves the son and has given all things into his hand. He who believes in the Son has eternal life; he who does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God rests upon him”(John 3:35-36).
Where do you come up with this stuff. We as Catholics absolutely believe you do not earn your way to heaven. We do believe actions taken on earth do earn merit and are pleasing to God when done with the same spirit as Jesus, what is wrong with that. By inference you are saying Catholics are trying to fool God by their actions on earth. That is insulting. Catholics know that Jesus is the Way and the Truth. We know you cant fool the Truth. Absolutely no way.
This is a slur of course and unfortunately at the heart of anti-Catholicism is a a need for the Catholics to always be wrong, even when the evidence disturbs the Puritan heart into suspecting our teaching on a given doctrine is correct.
Through slurs they comfort themselves and assuage the doubts of their impoverished consciences.
Thus, Catholic prayer is always ‘vain babbling’. Catholic miracles are always ‘lying signs and wonders’.
Catholic teachings when undeniably orthodox and consistent with their own core teachings are ‘of no avail’.
When we reverentially read and dwell on the scripture, we are the people who are ‘always hearing never understanding’.
The pious protestant has a relationship with Christ. The poor dumb Catholic is lost in a religious system.(This charge is so laughable if you have ever been in the study of a die hard reformation junkie with his Strong Concordance, Matthews Commentary, Calvins institutes, Sermons by Spurgeon and Johnathan Edwards and on, and on…talk about lost in a religious system! They need the stations of the cross to bring it back to the real world of faith and not high amphetamine head knowledge)
The Catholic in the end must always be wrong. James White, no friend of Catholicism and a sharp debater, readily acknowledges fundamentalist anti catholics will knowingly advance bad arguments, supported by bad evidence against posititions Catholics do not hold if they think it will have the effect of advancing their cause, because alls fair in attacking the presumed Whore of Babylon.
In the end, because we have a 2000 yr old faith and theirs is still in diapers and smelly ones at that, and because like bratty teenagers they want their elders to just shut up and give them the keys to the buick or orthodoxy as it were, our very existence is a painful contradiction to their proud pretensions.
We are the sign of contraction, which is why, I suspect, we outnumber them 3 to one outside abortion mills.
He says you don’t please God by following Christ, but by belief.
The problem is, anyone can see through that; what you do is the evidence of your belief and the more you do the more confident you are, so we one reinforces the other with graces and blessing.
The presbyterian obeys in his heart, genuflects in his heart and follows Christ in his heart.
When I was an officer in the 82d division and the Cmdg Gen came by I had to salute him. If I told him I was saluting him in my heart, I would have ended up in the slammer.
Steve
No, I do not agree. We are saved BY grace THROUGH faith, period! (Eph. 2:8-9). The Bible says nothing about us being willing to "receive this grace." The propositional gospel is that we BELIEVE in Christ, i.e., His Person and once for all sacrificial death on our behalf, for ALL our sins (Col. 2:14-15), and His subsequent, bodily resurrection. When one believes he is *given freely, *by God, eternal life in Christ (Jn. 3:14-18). When one believes he does not cooperate by wilfully "receiving grace," but instead it is BY divine grace that God saves Him forever.
The difference is subtle, but vast. This is why RCs can never come to understand the Biblical doctrine of assurance of salvation. They still think they can save themselves by pleasing God. They have no idea what the word “propitiation” means. That Christ is the “propitiation” for all our sins.
We are saved with an expectation for action on our part. I always go back to the Eph. 2:8-10 passage because it’s the Gospel message in a nutshell. Not until you grasp what Paul communictes there in just those few verses you will not be able to understand the theology which permeates all of his Epistles. He never deviates from the basic message that we are saved by grace through faith, and that this salvation is a GIFT of God, having nothing to do on our part. In fact, the Greek word for “gift” in this passage is “dorean.” It means, “without cause.” We are saved “dorean,” i.e., freely, gratis, gratuitously, giftwise, without a cause in us." The same is said of our justification in Christ.So what did Jesus say about this? (WWJD?) Consider the direction given by Jesus on how to pray: “…and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil…”
Now if Jesus saved us with no expectation for action on our part other than to profess a faith in Him, then why would he ask us to pray to the Father at all? Why would that be necessary if we’ve professed our faith that Jesus saved us? If nothing else, should not that direction be simply words of praise to the Father, with no request for additional concessions on His part?
Tell me what you think this means.Of course Christ is the propitiation for our sins.
I’m not real concerned what early church writers had to say. I am very concerned, however, with what God has communicated to us in His written Word. You should be too.Hm, is that what you think the early Christians believed. Can you cite some of the early Church Fathers on that?
Of course God doesn’t take away free will. I wouldn’t call free will a “gift.” Faith is not a gift, either. Salvation is a gift. So is righteousness and justification. As for free will, the unbeliever has the free will to accept by faith or reject the message concerning salvation through Jesus Christ. That’s “obedience of faith.”God does not take away the gift of free will. And the gift of faith or any other gift from God is something that we can accept or reject. Use scripture and your common sense and you will see this inescapable truth.
Tell me then, what are these “merits” for?Where do you come up with this stuff. We as Catholics absolutely believe you do not earn your way to heaven. We do believe actions taken on earth do earn merit and are pleasing to God when done with the same spirit as Jesus, what is wrong with that.
The simple answer is no. No one can love someone (in this case “Someone”) they don’t know. Only the saved love God. But you cannot be saved by claiming to love God. You are saved by believing Him.How about this simple and direct question? Can a person be saved if they do not love God? A simple and direct answer would be appreciated.
He is writing this TO Christians, but he is not writing this ABOUT Christians (def. “true believers”). True believers are never referred to as “sons of disobedience” in Scripture. What you lack, my friend, is a healthy, Biblical understanding of the believer’s new identity in Christ.Paul makes this quite clear in Ephesians 5:5-6 when he talks about disobedience and says, "Be sure of this, that no fornicator or impure man, or one who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. “Let no one deceive you with empty words, for it is because of these things that the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.” Take notice that Paul says these things to Christians. These are people of faith.
Well, this, Ozzie, is the heart of the matter. We aren’t prefering what early Christians said to scripture when we read them. The early christians we’re talking about are from the first, second, and third centuries. These people are people who walked with the apostles, some who even walked with Jesus. These people have more insight on what scripture should mean to a Christian more than we could ever know, not to mention they’re the people that wrote the scriptures. People like Clement I, Ignatius of Antioch, Justin Martyr, Irenaus, etc, they were people who knew the apostles PERSONALLY. They knew exactly what the apostles meant when they wrote something, or even said something, and then expounded upon it. How do you know that the epistles of St. Paul are the only ones that he wrote? How do you know that the epistle of James is the only one he wrote? You don’t. You talk about us taking scripture out of context, when truly, you’re the one who’s taking scripture out of context. The only Bible you truly have and that you truly believe in is the preconceived interpretation that you have of scripture that you have in your head. You probably believed in sola scriptura, sola fide, once saved, always saved before you even looked at a word of scripture. You simply took these things on faith, and then someone with a truly false interpretation of scripture gave a you a list and you went from there. They however, didn’t show you the rest, which is why you contradict yourself when you read off scripture passage that you try to fit to support your views, but there’s always anothe one that comes up. When you say that you know more about scripture than the people who personally knew the people who wrote the scripture, you’re kind of making yourself sound :whacky: . I don’t think you’d actually admit that, but you kind of are. Anyway, what I’m asking is, how much more do you know, than these early fathers of the church knew?I’m not real concerned what early church writers had to say. I am very concerned, however, with what God has communicated to us in His written Word. You should be too.
Point 1: Those who are in union with Christ are genuinely capable of deserving a reward from God.Tell me then, what are these “merits” for?
Ozzie,He is writing this TO Christians, but he is not writing this ABOUT Christians (def. “true believers”). True believers are never referred to as “sons of disobedience” in Scripture. What you lack, my friend, is a healthy, Biblical understanding of the believer’s new identity in Christ.
Paul writes something similar to the Corinthian believers, only he goes further in his explanation:
“Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals,
nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you; BUT YOU were washed, BUT YOU were
sanctified, BUT YOU were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit of our God” (1 Cor. 6:9-11).
All Scripture is written TO you Pax, but not all Scripture is written ABOUT you.
Again, you are utterly wrong. You can only believe that sin does not send you to hell by ignoring huge portions of scripture and misunderstanding the rest.Did you know Pax that no person will ever go to Hell because of sins?
You should be. They held the apostolic faith for hundreds of years until the canon of the Bible was fixed by the CATHOLIC church.I’m not real concerned what early church writers had to say. I am very concerned, however, with what God has communicated to us in His written Word. You should be too.