K
Karin
Guest
sure there is …it is the (zero) font …it looks like this…"Do you think there is a smaller font to match the weight of our opinions?
"…see I even bolded it…did you catch it?
sure there is …it is the (zero) font …it looks like this…"Do you think there is a smaller font to match the weight of our opinions?
you got it …it was so small I was hoping that there where no typos
Can you back your statement with substance? I do not believe that the answer is quite that simple.I go back to what I said before: in the “silly season,” priests seem to feel that they had to put their personal mark or “stamp” on the Mass, to give it a flavor that was distinctly “them.” That has lead to liturgical chaos. Out of chaos, there nearly always comes the desire for order; hence, the younger generation determining to offer the Mass correctly.
Hey, hey, hey now Ms. Toe Tag.thanks for the clarification… …
still agree with the general sentiment…but that is just my opinion
can you explain what you mean by this part (in bold)…The point of my OP was motivation. What motivates us? For example what motivates a Holy Priest–and by virtue of the Sacrament of Ordination, the Priesthood is Holy–to abuse the Sacred Liturgy. And what really–I mean really–motivates a young Holy Priest to embrace the TLM? It seems to me, and I could be getting it wrong, that there are a lot of babies being thrown out with the bathwater.
Oh dear… fellow Ms. Toe-Tag…Hey, hey, hey now Ms. Toe Tag.
I love my label!
I have to respectfully disagree here.This is great. I am not a traditionalist either, I am simply Catholic. The word “traditionalist” and “conservative” come from people who try to make the Catholic Church a political insititution and try to make people who do not practice the faith in it’s fullness, still Catholic. But as it goes, you are either Catholic or not. There really is no such thing as “conservative” or “liberal.”
Oh dear… fellow Ms. Toe-Tag…
I agree with the sentiment of your post…
We shall have no further HeHE’s among the toe-taggers…it is frowned upon
but then this is just my humble opinion and who cares?!
I’ll try.can you explain what you mean by this part (in bold)…
I can’t say for sure, but I think that what the poster means is that there is general idea that the only way we can get back to the reverence in the Holy Mass is to go back to the TLM.can you explain what you mean by this part (in bold)…
No, not at all.I can’t say for sure, but I think that what the poster means is that there is general idea that the only way we can get back to the reverence in the Holy Mass is to go back to the TLM.
I.
Kind of…I am sorry (honestly )I’ll try.
I had mentioned earlier in the thread that I had recently moved to a new state. After a couple of months at one Parish, I decided I was not happy there, and decided to try another. At the new Parish, a female Cantor changed a word in the “Gloria.” Instead of “and Peace to His people on earth,” she sang a what seemed to me a politically correct pronoun. It bothered me on some levels, and not at all on another when I thought about it.
But I suppose I have been wondering why she would change the word in the first place.
And I wonder what motivates others to revile the Novus Ordo, and others to revile the TLM.
I’m not sure if I answered your question sufficiently. Let me know. I’d like to have this conversation.
absolutely beautiful post, brother! You explained it well. I remember bits and pieces of the TLM. I remember the silence. When NO came along, for me, it was a breath of air, of expression from the gifts of the Holy Spirit…I felt Jesus up close and personal, not from far away. I am a true ENFJ, empathic and emotional. My relationship with God is personal, and if and when I come in contact with His faith community, it is something to behold. It isn’t the trappings that speak to me, it’s looking toward my neighbor and saying, I’m so glad to see you, meet you, welcome. The sermon on the mount and loaves and fishes are my favorite chapters…all of us coming together to listen, to share, and receive our Lord, not as a symbol, but He’s really there with us.One of the problems I see is that there is a gap between those of us who remember the TLM of our childhood and those who have come after. Everyone seems to think that the “new springtime of the Church” was a welcome thing, that Catholics were tired of the silence, tired of hearing rosary beads clacking, no one understood Latin, etc…all the usual shibboleths. What is not understood is that there were a great many of us who were absolutely appalled by what happened. Myself included.
Let me share something with you. In 1965, the Mass was still in Latin. By 1969 we had switched to the NO. I’ll not go into great detail but it disturbed me to the very core of my being that we sang Simon and Garfunkle’s “Bridge over Troubled Waters” and " Hello Darkness" at my graduation Mass from a Catholic High School. In four short years we went from singing Tantum Ergo to such classics as the now non-pc “Sons of God”, “They’ll Know We are Christians”, “Here I am Lord” and so on and so on.
We went from choir and organ to guitar. From absolute reverence to swaying, and grinning, and a strumming. I was aghast! I would try to find the earliest Mass I could attend to avoid what was going on. In 1970 we still received communion kneeling down…then came the change to removal of the communion rails and reception in the hand. I could not take it. And so, for some six years I simply did not attend Mass. I did not join another church, I simply placed my soul in jeopardy. I don’t think I was the only one.
When I moved up here to go to grad school, by word of mouth, I found that the cathedral parish was noted for its reverence. My then fiance and I began attending. It was the NO but it was reverent and, at that time, still maintained some pre-V II rites such as the Asperges Me (in Latin) before Mass started. There was a plaque in the cathedral which stated:
The Lord is in His holy temple; let all the earth keep silent before Him. Habakuk 2:20
And they did and for the most part today, still do.
I wouldn’t call myself a strict traditionalist. I love my parish and drive 25 miles to attend. We have a very reverent NO. What I have discovered recently through these forums and in particular watching the TLMs and the abused NOs on YouTube, etc. is that I find that there is a missing element for me today. I’m at a loss to explain it. The closest I can come to capturing my feelings is that with the TLM I entered into the presence of God in a way that I cannot with the NO. I don’t know exactly how to explain it to you.
Father has asked me if I would be willing to sing in a Gregorian choir. If the universal indult is issued and if we are able to have a TLM at the cathedral, I feel strongly called. I’m not a knuckle dragger…I loved the Church of my youth and wish that everyone could have experienced it. I think my friend Palmas feels the same way since he and I are of an age and we lived in the same city. We simply don’t have adequate points of reference.
For the record, I am INTJ. Oh, yeah, too, I have never received Our Lord in my hand either.
No, they will hijack your thread in favor of their own agendas and private conversations … as per usual. Forget about honest discussion.Anyone care to respond?
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1819147
Well, we’ve been having a very nice discussion since about 1:00. (it’s now an hour later)No, they will hijack your thread in favor of their own agendas and private conversations … as per usual. Forget about honest discussion.