I don't get it...if you are a non-Catholic Christian, then why aren't you a Catholic Christian?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, and neither do you!
History is on my side on this one.

Here’s a writing from St. Ignatius from around 106 to 110AD (about the same time as Revelations was written), before the canon of the New Testament was defined.
Chapter 8. Let nothing be done without the bishop
See that you all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.
St. Ignatius doesn’t explain the term, he uses it, it was already understood what the Catholic Church was.

Do you have any evidence, besides the ‘snipes’, which are no more than your opinion, to support any other Churches in existence?
 
Jesus tells us there is really only two denominations that exist. Wheat or tares and we are all growing in the same field. The wheat are in spirit and in truth. The tares do not bare good fruit. We are however not to uproot the tares or we uproot the wheat. The tares do have bits and peices of truth, just not the full truth of the spirit of God from God.

Only God can cause a wheat to bare good fruit since no one bares good fruit of themselves.

Denominational names are simply a creation of man to symbolize a differing version of Christian confusion due to spiritual famine.

God Bless
A lot of the denominations are the creation of men with differing versions and confusion due to ‘private interpretation’ of scriptures.
 
Jesus tells us there is really only two denominations that exist. Wheat or tares and we are all growing in the same field. The wheat are in spirit and in truth. The tares do not bare good fruit. We are however not to uproot the tares or we uproot the wheat. The tares do have bits and peices of truth, just not the full truth of the spirit of God from God.

Only God can cause a wheat to bare good fruit since no one bares good fruit of themselves.

Denominational names are simply a creation of man to symbolize a differing version of Christian confusion due to spiritual famine.

God Bless
Great post!!👍
 
A lot of the denominations are the creation of men with differing versions and confusion due to ‘private interpretation’ of scriptures.
The thread that I posted on the Death and resurrection Controversy illustrates the differing views of Personal interpretations though out Christian history regarding the death and resurrection time line.

You will probably like the objective manner in which all historical views are presented objectivly allowing the Prophecies to interpret themselves in concert with the scripture of time as God Defined it in the scriptures.

Hope you will check out the thread.

God Bless
 
Great post!!👍
Still no scriptural support of your view? 🤷

Oh well, I have a 26 hour shift starting at 6AM and need to get some sleep. I’ll look for any scriptures you can find to support your view, or I’ll just maintain my view that it is a ‘man-made’ tradition, without scriptural support. 😉
 
The thread that I posted on the Death and resurrection Controversy illustrates the differing views of Personal interpretations though out Christian history regarding the death and resurrection time line.

You will probably like the objective manner in which all historical views are presented objectivly allowing the Prophecies to interpret themselves in concert with the scripture of time as God Defined it in the scriptures.

Hope you will check out the thread.

God Bless
Hey Todd,

I know there was some controversies, but I also realize that usually no one in the present day is willing to affliate themself with some of those ‘beliefs’. I also remember seeing that those controversies were your own work, right? If so, why not provide your ‘certifications’?

I also hope you removed the ‘anti-Catholic’ material on the link, if it’s the link I remember viewing in the past.

Send me the link, here or in pm. I have to get some sleep and will look at it tomorrow sometime.
 
History is on my side on this one.

Here’s a writing from St. Ignatius from around 106 to 110AD (about the same time as Revelations was written), before the canon of the New Testament was defined.

St. Ignatius doesn’t explain the term, he uses it, it was already understood what the Catholic Church was.

Do you have any evidence, besides the ‘snipes’, which are no more than your opinion, to support any other Churches in existence?
The church that you call catholic, is such because some men decided to call it that. It was initially called The Way, and Christians were Christians, not catholics! Tell me, what do you know about the Greek Orthodox Church? Does it predate the cc?
 
Hey Todd,

I know there was some controversies, but I also realize that usually no one in the present day is willing to affliate themself with some of those ‘beliefs’. I also remember seeing that those controversies were your own work, right? If so, why not provide your ‘certifications’?

I also hope you removed the ‘anti-Catholic’ material on the link, if it’s the link I remember viewing in the past.

Send me the link, here or in pm. I have to get some sleep and will look at it tomorrow sometime.
The Anti Catholic material was removed per the request. The controversy surrounding the day of the week began long before I was born as is evident by the third century bishops perception which is objectivly illustrated since we are not to uproot tares or we uproot the wheat.

God Bless
 
Still no scriptural support of your view? 🤷

Oh well, I have a 26 hour shift starting at 6AM and need to get some sleep. I’ll look for any scriptures you can find to support your view, or I’ll just maintain my view that it is a ‘man-made’ tradition, without scriptural support. 😉
I will pray for your safe completion of this grueling shift:thumbsup: And what position am I supposedly defending; that as a Christian, Iam able to follow the teachings of Christ? You know, more than just the disciples got saved and baptized!
 
The church that you call catholic, is such because some men decided to call it that. It was initially called The Way, and Christians were Christians, not catholics! Tell me, what do you know about the Greek Orthodox Church? Does it predate the cc?
The Orthodox and Catholic was one Church, until 1054. I showed you where the term Catholic was derived from the Greek, used in scriptures. Acts 9:31.

And, btw, do you know who the early Church fathers were? St. Ignatius was a ‘student/disciple’ of St. John who authored the Gospel of John, Revelations and 1, 2, and 3 John.

Rather than just tell me what you believe, why aren’t you using scriptures? I’m still waiting on the scriptural support of your view on all the points I’ve provided in response to your questions. I’m afraid you’re only helping my argument with the lack of any evidences to support you. 🤷
 
I will pray for your safe completion of this grueling shift:thumbsup: And what position am I supposedly defending; that as a Christian, Iam able to follow the teachings of Christ? You know, more than just the disciples got saved and baptized!
Thanks, I just got off a 48 this morning.

Yes, the Church grew greatly, before any scriptures of the New Testament was written. Many have come to believe in Christ. This doesn’t change the fact that none appointed themself to a postion of ‘authority’ in scriptures, as many do today.
 
The Orthodox and Catholic was one Church, until 1054. I showed you where the term Catholic was derived from the Greek, used in scriptures. Acts 9:31.

And, btw, do you know who the early Church fathers were? St. Ignatius was a ‘student/disciple’ of St. John who authored the Gospel of John, Revelations and 1, 2, and 3 John.

Rather than just tell me what you believe, why aren’t you using scriptures? I’m still waiting on the scriptural support of your view on all the points I’ve provided in response to your questions. I’m afraid you’re only helping my argument with the lack of any evidences to support you. 🤷
I have heard that Ignatius was a student of John, and all of Jesus’s words apply to me, ALL of them, and all of the words of the OT prophets as well! You know, like Jeremiah 29:11? Or Psalms 46:10? These both give me comfort and hope!
 
BTW, you aren’t the toddvetter33 that was banned a little while back are you? :eek:
Of Course I am. I never did anything wrong to be banned the first time except present a non denominational perception that went contrary to the Roman church. I did so in the Non Catholic threads of this forum just as I am currently doing where every non catholic view goes contrary to the Roman Church. This thread says it welcomes the Protastant view. Are they not telling the truth when they say this view is welcomed here? The information that was pointed out to me as being anti-catholic has been removed, so I don’t think we will have any more issues over banning if the Truth is free to all and always comes out on top.

You would actually serve this forum better by illustrating any page 1-38 that is not presenting a truth based on the evidence provided from within the study I shared in the “death and resurrection controversy thread”

Remember truth will always come out on top and see through the darkness of a lie. If I am wrong in my presented perceptions, You could help me see the light of God that you have received from the Pillar of Truth (as is Romes claim).

God Bless

God Bless
 
Thanks, I just got off a 48 this morning.

Yes, the Church grew greatly, before any scriptures of the New Testament was written. Many have come to believe in Christ. This doesn’t change the fact that none appointed themself to a postion of ‘authority’ in scriptures, as many do today.
No disrespect, but there is a reason why for 43 years as a Christian, I am not a catholic Christian!
 
I have heard that Ignatius was a student of John, and all of Jesus’s words apply to me, ALL of them, and all of the words of the OT prophets as well! You know, like Jeremiah 29:11? Or Psalms 46:10? These both give me comfort and hope!
Well you’d make a more convincing argument if you showed where Christ instructed the multitude to ‘teach’ or ‘preach’, or where Christ told anyone to ‘appoint’ themselves.

Here’s another teaching Christ gave only to the Apostles, but it seems to go against your view…
Joh 15:16 You have not chosen me: but I have chosen you; and have appointed you, that you should go and should bring forth fruit; and your fruit should remain: that whatsoever you shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you.
The King James Version uses the word ‘ordained’ instead of ‘appointed’, but they mean the same thing.
 
Of Course I am. I never did anything wrong to be banned except present a differing non denominational perception that went contrary to the Roman church. I did so in the Non Catholic threads of this forum just as I am currently doing where every non catholic view goes contrary to the Roman Church. This thread says it welcomes the Protastant view. Are they not telling the truth when they say this? The information that was pointed out to me as being anti-catholic has been removed so I don’t think we will have any more issues over banning if the Truth is free to all and always comes out on top.

God Bless
Circumventing a banning is also a bannable offense.

9. Debating moderator action, including discussing, disputing, or speculating as to why a member’s posting privileges were restricted, why posted messages were edited or deleted, or why threads were closed or removed from public fora
10. Posts in circumvention of a restriction, suspension, or ban imposed by staff
 
No disrespect, but there is a reason why for 43 years as a Christian, I am not a catholic Christian!
It takes time. I understand. I was a Protestant for 30 years, before converting to Catholicism. That was in 1985. 😉
 
Well you’d make a more convincing argument if you showed where Christ instructed the multitude to ‘teach’ or ‘preach’, or where Christ told anyone to ‘appoint’ themselves.

Here’s another teaching Christ gave only to the Apostles, but it seems to go against your view…

The King James Version uses the word ‘ordained’ instead of ‘appointed’, but they mean the same thing.
In an earlier post, you mentioned pastors, priests, deacons and others as those appointed. Since our church has a pastor, and deacons, well, bada bing, badaboom! And as far as “teaching” of others by ordinary Christians, such as you and I, is what I would call informal; you know Bible studie and such? I am not an ordained minister, but I have knowledge of things, that I can share with believers and non believers. to say that we cannot or do not have the Holy Spirit in us, is to say that one cannot have apersonal relationship with Jesus:eek: And any Christian who loves God, knows that that is wwrong!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top