P
Prodigal_Son1
Guest
History is on my side on this one.No, and neither do you!
Here’s a writing from St. Ignatius from around 106 to 110AD (about the same time as Revelations was written), before the canon of the New Testament was defined.
St. Ignatius doesn’t explain the term, he uses it, it was already understood what the Catholic Church was.Chapter 8. Let nothing be done without the bishop
See that you all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.
Do you have any evidence, besides the ‘snipes’, which are no more than your opinion, to support any other Churches in existence?