If Biden Wins, He May Pick Attorney General Who is Trying to Put Pro-Life People in Prison

  • Thread starter Thread starter Victoria33
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Victoria33 said:
Read up on your history and article, it has happened.
Click to expand...
It would be a criminal offense, corruption and graft, if a person was jailed for purely being pro life in USA. This is not N.K, China or Russia.

Pro-life stances have nothing to do with criminal activity resulting in a person thrown in jail.
 
Last edited:
vz71 said:
This is not the case. The electoral college will vote, the votes will be counted, and then we have a winner for the presidency.
The electoral votes could very easily go in an unexpected way.
Click to expand...
Nonsense. It is and will continue go the normal way.
January 20 Biden is President.
 
vz71 said:
Possibly.
Speaking as though it is fact instead of possibility is dishonest.
Click to expand...
Dishonesty is any Republican lying about widespread fraud.

Biden WILL be President on January 20. Nothing short of his death will stop that and if that happened Harris would become President.
 
Montrose said:
Dishonesty is…
Click to expand...
Exactly what I said.
Peddling off possibility as though it is fact is dishonest.
It has nothing to do with politics.
It has to do with facts.
Montrose said:
Nothing short of his death will stop that
Click to expand...
Or faithless electors could cast ballots in a different way than expected.
Or some state electors are disqualified and their individual state legislatures appoint others.
Or we end up with neither candidate having 270 and the senate votes for Trump.
Montrose said:
and if that happened Harris would become President.
Click to expand...
Actually…no that is not how that works.
The vp takes over the presidency ONLY if Biden is president. Before that time, there is no line of succession set up.
 
Anonkun said:
Would you mind explaining where the lie is?
In the last few weeks we’ve found:
-votes moved across state lines
-votes counted after polls have closed
-video evidence of votes counted without observers present
-threats made by party members to prevent whistleblowers from coming forward after discussing vote tampering
-counted votes that outstrip the size of the electorate by over 200%
-identification laws that were ignored despite being required by state constitution for proper vote counting (e.g. 2fi for signatures).

Unless you have an answer to each of these known issues (among many more that are currently appearing before court), you have absolutely no leg to stand on when you allege “no fraud exists.”
Click to expand...
The proof for my claim is the FACT that the courts have thrown out 35+ cases due to non-specific allegations and no evidence.
Also in every single case brought (then thrown out or withdrawn) none of the lawyers have dared to use the word fraud in front of the judge because they knew the consequences for alleging fraud without evidence.
It is very strange that you claim all the above is evidence but then why hasn’t it been presented in court? The answer is that it is baseless.
Trump’s fan base keeps pushing nonsense like that and the courts are throwing it out.
Even Trump’s AG Barr has publicly said that nothing has been found that would overturn the results.

NO WIDESPREAD FRAUD. ZERO EVIDENCE OF SUCH.
 
Trump is only attempting to get to the truth of the results.

There is plenty of evidence of irregularities if you really want to know it and face facts and be informed.

The democrat party has been attempting a coup since the loss of the 2016 election. They failed and this was
their final attempt. That is why Joe Biden stayed in his
basement all summer and never actively campaigned.
They knew they had everything in place to ensure a Biden victory. That is why they were so smug and confident a frail and feeble 78 year old candidate would win. They have played everyone for fools.
 
7_Sorrows said:
Trump is only attempting to get to the truth of the results.

There is plenty of evidence of irregularities if you really want to know it and face facts and be informed.
Click to expand...
Trump would not recognise the truth if it smacked him on the head. He is a compulsive liar and all his lies are easy to fact check because he says them on camera and in tweets.

There is ZERO EVIDENCE of widespread fraud or anything that will overturn the election results.
35 legal cases thrown out or withdrawn. Reason? No evidence provided.
If there was evidence it would have been presented. I am sick and tired of hearing about plenty of evidence. Trump’s legal team have come up empty.
 
Biden’s list of contenders for the job –

Sally Yates - former deputy attorney general
Doug Jones, soon to be former senator from Alabama who was defeated in November
Deval Patrick, former Massachusetts governor and former Justice Department civil rights chief;
Jeh Johnson, the Homeland Security secretary under Obama;
Xavier Becerra California Attorney General
Lisa Monaco, a former Homeland Security adviser in the Obama White House and who previously worked at the FBI and as top national security prosecutor at Justice.

Biden, along with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris, are interviewing contenders and weighing the decision. They are not expected to announce a decision until next week at the earliest,
 
Nope, there are only six on the short list.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

My choice is top center. Doug Jones.

16th Street Baptist Church bombing case[edit]​

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Jones during the trial of Bobby Frank Cherry

Jones prosecuted Thomas Edwin Blanton Jr. and Bobby Frank Cherry, two members of the Ku Klux Klan, for their roles in the 1963 16th Street Baptist Church bombing. The case was reopened the year before Jones was appointed, but did not gain traction until his appointment. A federal grand jury was called in 1998, which caught the attention of Cherry’s ex-wife, Willadean Cherry, and led her to call the FBI to give her testimony. Willadean then introduced Jones to family and friends, who reported their own experiences from the time of the bombing. A key piece of evidence was a tape from the time of the bombing in which Blanton said he had plotted with others to make the bomb. Jones was deputized to argue in state court and indicted Blanton and Cherry in 2000.[17][18] Blanton was found guilty in 2001 and Cherry in 2002. Both were sentenced to life in prison. Blanton was up for parole in 2016; Jones spoke against his release, and parole was denied. Cherry died in prison in 2004.[19][20]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top