If God is not The Trinity, when what did He mean...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2ndGen
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That hasn’t happened yet, it happens when Satan is defeated and there is no more sin that can erase God’s Word. There will only be goodness and we’ll always do the right thing when Satan is gone.

Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the (OLD) law, till all be fulfilled.

Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

Revelation 20:11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.

Jeremiah 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and** they shall be my people**.

Revelation 21:3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and** they shall be his people**, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.

Revelation 21:4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
I am guessing from some glances at your posts that you are muslim, is that correct? What is your view on the Gospel or Injeel as you call it in arabic? Do you believe that we as Christians have the infallible word of God contained in the Gospels?

thanks

-corey
 
I am guessing from some glances at your posts that you are muslim, is that correct? What is your view on the Gospel or Injeel as you call it in arabic? Do you believe that we as Christians have the infallible word of God contained in the Gospels?

thanks

-corey
Yes, only not interpreted with Jesus as deity, but Jesus as a human who God dwelled in as a prophet, then raised up to rule like God over us and be High Priest to make atonement for our sins. But still as a servant to the one God.
 
If you look at the opening verses of Gen. Chapter 6, it sure looks like the angels were creating something.
 
Long thread, might have missed it.

It cannot be the royal we, as at the time that it was written, kings saw themselves as gods not as the state. You had not yet gotten to the idea of the nation-state, so that is a doubtful usage.

It could not have been the angels. Why would God need to create more things in their image?

What is the image of God? Is it literal? Does he have a face and hands and legs? Or is it a quality of the soul? Are we created differently from the Angels? If so, that might be part of the answer.
 
Long thread, might have missed it.

It cannot be the royal we, as at the time that it was written, kings saw themselves as gods not as the state. You had not yet gotten to the idea of the nation-state, so that is a doubtful usage.

It could not have been the angels. Why would God need to create more things in their image?

What is the image of God? Is it literal? Does he have a face and hands and legs? Or is it a quality of the soul? Are we created differently from the Angels? If so, that might be part of the answer.
I think we have somewhat gotten away from the original intent of this thread. The original purpose of this thread is for discussion about Genesis 1:26. The angels took no place in creation. Only God. I am under the impression that this is the Jewish as well as the Christian view, however I do not know about Islam.
 
Long thread, might have missed it.

It cannot be the royal we, as at the time that it was written, kings saw themselves as gods not as the state. You had not yet gotten to the idea of the nation-state, so that is a doubtful usage.

It could not have been the angels. Why would God need to create more things in their image?

What is the image of God? Is it literal? Does he have a face and hands and legs? Or is it a quality of the soul? Are we created differently from the Angels? If so, that might be part of the answer.
The truth is we don’t really know exactly what is meant when scripture states humans were created in God’s image.
 
I think we have somewhat gotten away from the original intent of this thread. The original purpose of this thread is for discussion about Genesis 1:26. The angels took no place in creation. Only God. I am under the impression that this is the Jewish as well as the Christian view, however I do not know about Islam.
Jews do not believe angels were involved. One Jewish interpetation fo the verse is that God out of politeness included the angels in his thoughts. But the verse in which the act of creation takes place clearly states that God – no plural – created man.
 
If you look at the opening verses of Gen. Chapter 6, it sure looks like the angels were creating something.
I’m not sure exactly which verses you have in mind, but there is one problem with any such interpretation of biblical texts: angels are incapable of creating anything *ex nihilo. *It requires a being of infinite power to create *ex nihilo. *It would be theological heresy and philosophical nonsense for a biblical author to assert that a finite creature possesses infinite power. It is sort of like the idea of a square circle. A square circle is a contradiction in terms. A square circle cannot exits. Even God in His infinite power cannot create a square circle. Likewise, the idea of a finite being with infinite power is a contradiction in terms.

The most finite creatures can do is fashion something from pre-existing material. This is to “create” in the common sense of the word, which we intend when we say that Michelangelo created works of art. We can say that angels can create in this sense of the word. And they are certainly more intelligent and more powerful than man.

itinerant1:tiphat:
 
The truth is we don’t really know exactly what is meant when scripture states humans were created in God’s image.
It is assumed that God created humans in His image, not in that we look like him but that we have the ability to feel emotion, unlike animals. God is also described as having wings, but do we?

“He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge” (Psalm 91:4)
 
God said He’s the beginning and the end.
Jesus said He’s the beginning and the end.

If God and Jesus are “not” one in the same,
which one of the two was lying?
 
Jews do not believe angels were involved. One Jewish interpetation fo the verse is that God out of politeness included the angels in his thoughts. But the verse in which the act of creation takes place clearly states that God – no plural – created man.
Let’s look at how this passage looks in English:

“Then God said, Let us make man in our image” (Genesis 1:26)

By using the plural “us” God indicates that He is talking to someone else. Otherwise He would use “me” to indicate He was talking to Himself. However God uses the singular “image” not images. This would indicate that He must be taking to someone else who is also himself. With the doctrine of the Holy Trinity this makes perfect sense. He is talking to the Son who although a different person has the same image because The Holy Trinity has plural persons, but only one image.
 
God said He’s the beginning and the end.
Jesus said He’s the beginning and the end.

If God and Jesus are “not” one in the same,
which one of the two was lying?
Exactly if you don’t believe this you run into a contradiction of faith.
 
It is assumed that God created humans in His image, not in that we look like him but that we have the ability to feel emotion, unlike animals. God is also described as having wings, but do we?

“He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge” (Psalm 91:4)
Let me help you to modify your assumption. Pure spirits, such as angels and God, are not emotive beings. Emotion is proper only to animal nature. Both man and the lower animals are capable of emotion. Animals clearly have some emotions. Has you dog never been glad to see you? Does a lion ever become angry?

So, when it is said that man is created in the image of God, the meaning does not include emotions. Scripture speaks of the anger of Yahweh metaphorically. :mad: “Anger” refers to Divine justice. Scripture does not mean that God is literally angry any more than it means he literally has an arm when it refers to the 'arm of Yahweh". The arm of God refers to His operative power.

itinerant1 :tiphat:
 
I think I have to argue with you on that one. How then could God love?

“God is love.” (1 John 4:16)
 
I’m not sure exactly which verses you have in mind, but there is one problem with any such interpretation of biblical texts: angels are incapable of creating anything *ex nihilo. *It requires a being of infinite power to create *ex nihilo. *It would be theological heresy and philosophical nonsense for a biblical author to assert that a finite creature possesses infinite power. It is sort of like the idea of a square circle. A square circle is a contradiction in terms. A square circle cannot exits. Even God in His infinite power cannot create a square circle. Likewise, the idea of a finite being with infinite power is a contradiction in terms.

The most finite creatures can do is fashion something from pre-existing material. This is to “create” in the common sense of the word, which we intend when we say that Michelangelo created works of art. We can say that angels can create in this sense of the word. And they are certainly more intelligent and more powerful than man.

itinerant1:tiphat:
From my reading of the creation story, only light was created ex nihilo. Everything else was created out of stuff that was in existence. The Hebrew assumes that the earth had been shapeless and formless when God begins creation. So God is really working with pre-existing material in all His creations other than light. Light is the only thing that comes into existence as a consequence of God uttering a word.
 
Let me help you to modify your assumption. Pure spirits, such as angels and God, are not emotive beings. Emotion is proper only to animal nature. Both man and the lower animals are capable of emotion. Animals clearly have some emotions. Has you dog never been glad to see you? Does a lion ever become angry?

So, when it is said that man is created in the image of God, the meaning does not include emotions. Scripture speaks of the anger of Yahweh metaphorically. :mad: “Anger” refers to Divine justice. Scripture does not mean that God is literally angry any more than it means he literally has an arm when it refers to the 'arm of Yahweh". The arm of God refers to His operative power.

itinerant1 :tiphat:
So when angels lusted after women, that was emotionless?

When Satan experienced pride and jealousy and envy, that was emotionless?

When angels praise God, that’s emotionless?

:confused:
 
It is assumed that God created humans in His image, not in that we look like him but that we have the ability to feel emotion, unlike animals. God is also described as having wings, but do we?

“He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge” (Psalm 91:4)
ok. A good rule of thumb is that when we say we assume, we are saying we don’t really know.
 
So when angels lusted after women, that was emotionless?

When Satan experienced pride and jealousy and envy, that was emotionless?

When angels praise God, that’s emotionless?

:confused:
Exactly if God had no emotion, then he wouldn’t have created anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top