F
FaithofAbraham
Guest
But Jesus did have to die if he wanted to be honored with the role.If Jesus’ death did not make atonement for sins, how is His High Priesltly role any different to that of other Jewish high priests. What I mean is that all the other high priests were performing sacrifices for the sins of themselves and the people already, but those sacrifices had to be repeated over and over again because they were imperfect.
I don’t think that Jesus died and then became High Priest. He was High Priest because of the perfect sacrifice of Himself on Calvary. What was the point of Jesus giving up His life so that he could merely be Mediator? Moses was a mediator between God and men and he didnt have to die so he could perform that role.
Hebrews 5:8-10 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered; And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him; Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.
Then we bring our prayer offerings of repentance just like an animal to Jesus the High Priest, and he sends them up to God as a burnt offering for our sins. Then we are forgiven.
So our sacrifices STILL have to be repeated over and over again because they are our prayers to God, and our repentance each time we sin.
The difference is with Jesus is that they aren’t animals but prayers, and as Melchizedek greater than Abraham Jesus makes atonement for all people of the world, not just the Jews as Aaron did.