M
marktomlinson
Guest
Haha thanks. I really just came on here looking for justification from the Christian side. Itās funny how many fellow Jews have signed up!Welcome to CAF![]()
Haha thanks. I really just came on here looking for justification from the Christian side. Itās funny how many fellow Jews have signed up!Welcome to CAF![]()
yeah but I didnāt even take it out lol.The one I took said that I was a āConfident believerā, but it didnāt specify in what Faith.
Hey, I just too another online quiz and it tells me Iām suited to be a Catholic(and I didnāt even tick the āNo meat on Fridayā box either, as in the UK we only have to do that during Lent).
I also took the spider carefully outside on a tissue and it didnāt put me down as a Buddhist.
What is your source?I remember asking this very question to a religious scholar who told me (I canāt remember the source either, which is annoying) that estimates of the numbers of Christians in the first 100 years after Jesusā death numbered only around 1500-2000. This is in a population of hundreds of thousands, if not a couple of million Jews. To put it in perspective, the Jewish historian Josephus wrote about the siege of Jerusalem in 70AD and gave the figure of 100,000 for the Jewish captives taken.
Good articule, thanks. I think that one thing should be clearifed , the number of Jews that accepted jesus as the Messiah before and after the Crusifixion are not the same. I would say that thounsands that belived prior said well guess I was wrong after.What is your source?
Good article below. Very detailed as the best one can be. Multiple estimates put the number at 7,500 at the end of the 1st century. See page 436. Iām not endorsing the number either way, just stating as fact.
hts.org.za/index.php/HTS/article/download/430/329
I also at one point agreed with everything you said. My difficulty with this way of thinking came to fruition when I understood the concept of Holy Tradition and apostolic succession. I couldnāt believe that those who set at the hands and feet of the Apostles got it wrong or were dishonest. They lived such pure lives!I think it can CATEGORICALLY be concluded that not ALL Jews believed in Jesus.
As with all the Manifestations of God (Jesus, Muhammad, the Bab, Bahaāullah etc) rejection is EXPECTED.
If it was OBVIOUS that they are who they say they are, where and what becomes of our free will?
Clearly we all have free will, it is an integral part of being human, and God very rarely interferes with it, so if Jesus was very OBVIOUSLY the Messiah, then Jews would have no need for faith any more, it becomes a puppet show. Are human beings puppets of God? If so, what then is the purpose of faith?
The way that God tests His loved ones is to enable spiritual perceptions to guide ones decisions towards Him, to recognize Him and to follow His teachings in the age in which one lives in. And it is a āspiritualā obligation to recognize His Chosen Ones throughout history.
My conversations in this thread have already established that Jesus fulfilled the prophecies of being the Messiah through a spiritual/symbolic interpretation of Scripture, not a literal sense.
If the prophecies were OBVIOUSLY fulfilled we become nothing more than mere animals following the instincts of empiricism. Animals follow the OBVIOUS, humans have a much higher capacity than that, or are we just mere animals waiting for the discover the waterfall falling down the mountain?
When we look for OBVIOUS signs, then we are no longer spiritual beings, and that can be seen throughout history with the animalistic acts of the pharisees (and Jesus), the idol worshippers and Quraysh (and Muhammad) and the Islamic mullas (and Bahaāuāllah)
Thereās another thread on this topic running at the moment - meanwhile here are a few links on the subject of our view of Messiah:I have read that they believe that He did not fulfill six messianic prophecies. Does anyone know what those six prophecies are and their biblical addresses? A friend of mine and I are discussing this topic and trying to get a better understanding.
Where is the source for this?According to the Talmud, the Messiah must come in or before the year 6000. Each thousand years represents one day of Creation.
I found the following sources: Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin (97A), Rav Kattina; Talmud, Tractate Avodah Zarah (9A); and Nachmanidesā commentary on Torah (Genesis 2:3). However, this theory seems to be based on young-earth creationism, that the earth is no older than 6000 years and will not survive longer than 7000. Only a tiny minority of Jews hold this view of the earth.Where is the source for this?
Why would we have to prove its truth? Particularly if the whole earth was Christian.The number of Christians today is irrelevant. Even if the entire Earth was converted to be Christian, it would still not prove its truth.
I made no such claim, and either way the actual numbers are not relevant. What is relevant is the message.The points about the numbers of followers are actually quite relevant in discussing the OP. Youāre making claims about āthousandsā of followers of Jesus, only historical evidence completely contradicts it.
You mean a bit like Sikhism was, and still is today?Whatās more it also highlights that until the change from conversion of the Jews to conversion of pagans, Christianity remained a small, insignificant cult
Belief in something means nothing and does not automatically mean that the concept around which such belief is centred is true. it doesnāt matter if one person, several or everyone believes it.Why would we have to prove its truth? Particularly if the whole earth was Christian.
The whole point is to evangelise and save souls, not to engage is a philosophical discussion about trying to rationally prove the truth of Christās message. If doing so helps to evangelise some souls, then that is a useful tool, but believe it or not providing rational evidence is not the main ways souls are evangelised.
If, as in your scenario above, the whole world was Christian, then what would be the point of proving that the message is true. There would be a whole world of believers.
25m people is not by any means an insignificant number. Plus in terms of conversions to the religion and also growth in terms of relative growth against the number of adherents, Sikhism is in the top 5 of religions.You mean a bit like Sikhism was, and still is today?
My dear friend AveChriste, Gandhi lived a pure life too, however he could never be considered an infallible authority on Godās Word.I also at one point agreed with everything you said. My difficulty with this way of thinking came to fruition when I understood the concept of Holy Tradition and apostolic succession. I couldnāt believe that those who set at the hands and feet of the Apostles got it wrong or were dishonest. They lived such pure lives!
Indeed it is. What do you think would have happened if Jesus did come and LITERALLY conquered Israel with His sword, alone and all-conquering?The main issue, I think, is that the Jewish expectation of the Messiah is that of a Davidic
Warrior King vanquishing all the enemies of Israel once and for all. Jesus did not exactly
come to do that. He didnāt lead an army against the Romans and stuff like that.
I think that is the issue.
Judaism or rather Hebraism lost its way a long time ago, if fact Hebraism began fracturing as far back as the Babylonian exile with the introduction of Talmudist teaching which in my opinion is a rats whisker short of occultism, which has over the centuries replaced traditional Hebrew/Tanakh teaching which very clearly points to Jesus as the Messiah. If a modern Jew asks his Rabbi who Jesus was he will be directed to the Talmud which has created a dreadful slur upon his name and his mothers also. It is extremely difficult to bring evangelism to Jews because you most likely will be labeled an anti-Semite!The very notion of the Messiah is Jewish in origin. The Jewish people have been for centuries studying the Tanakh which gives the specifics of the criteria the eventual Messiah will fufill. So why, if Jesus is obviously this Messiah, then why does the Jewish religion and people as a whole reject him?
Certainly to my mind Jewish people would have the best idea of who the Messiah is and so would have been able to recognise Jesus if he really was the Messiah?
In the scheme of things, 25 million is a tiny small number compared to the 7 billion people now living on the planet (0.36% of the worldās population). You might arguably be the 5th largest religion (and that is debatable) but the 4th largest religion (Hinduism) has 1 billion followers.25m people is not by any means an insignificant number. Plus in terms of conversions to the religion and also growth in terms of relative growth against the number of adherents, Sikhism is in the top 5 of religions.
which isnāt Jewish though. Messiah wonāt be someone who āvanquishes all the enemiesā but someone who will be a spiritual leader. The concept of Jews is rather that of loving kindness. When Moshiach comes every day will be Shabbat.The main issue, I think, is that the Jewish expectation of the Messiah is that of a Davidic
Warrior King vanquishing all the enemies of Israel once and for all. Jesus did not exactly
come to do that. He didnāt lead an army against the Romans and stuff like that.
I think that is the issue.