If Mary was the mother of God...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rumpelstiltskin
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
moondweller:
May I ask, what would a Catholic ever consider “excessive” Marian devotion? In the Catholic mind, is there such a thing?
Yes!
The first part of the question was, "what would a Catholic ever consider “excessive” Marian devotion? Since you answered “yes,” could you give some documented examples and why you would consider them excessive?
 
I agree with your logic, but not your assertions. How do you know that: “Mary is certainly the most holy and obedient human who ever lived?” Or that she (or any deceased person) intercedes for you: “and she is a saint and our intercessor”?

If she truly is the Catholic’s heavenly “intercessor,” then, logically, why wouldn’t a Catholic talk more about Mary than Christ? She’s at the forefront.
Catholics do not really talk more about Mary than Jesus. That is just a false impression being created by those with an agenda against the Church. They accomplish this by ignoring thousands and thausands of Catholic writings on Jesus and concentrating on those writings that “seem” to support the impression they are trying to create.
Go to a Catholic Mass next Sunday and you will come back with a different opinion.
Since Catholics don’t believe they’re at the moment eternally saved through “faith” in Christ alone, but rather “being saved” with the hope that they “will be saved” (based on their present performance),
Salvation is a process. Even Paul did not claim to be saved (1 Corinthians 4:2-5). And writing to the “saved” Philippians he says “work out your salvation” (Philippians 2:12). Seems Pauls was Catholic.
then why wouldn’t Mary, their heavenly intercessor, through devotion to her, be considered a “type” of savior (small “s”)?
The name Mary seems to touch a sensitive nerve in some circles.
Here is an example of a Catholic prayer: “I confess to almighty God, and to you, my brothers and sisters, that I have sinned through my own fault, in my thoughts and in my words, in what I have done, and in what I have failed to do; and I ask blessed Mary, ever virgin, all the angels and saints, and you, my brothers and sisters, to pray for me to the Lord, our God.”
The prayer mentions Almighty God and brothers and sisters and all angels and saints and Mary … but non-Catholics and anti-catholics will remember only “Mary” and forget the rest. That is how they mislead themselves into believing that Catholics place Mary above God.

placido
 
The first part of the question was, "what would a Catholic ever consider “excessive” Marian devotion? Since you answered “yes,” could you give some documented examples and why you would consider them excessive?
Start a new thread and let me know. For now: is Mary Mother of God or not?

placido
 
Catholics do not really talk more about Mary than Jesus. That is just a false impression being created by those with an agenda against the Church.
Of the 170 prayers said in the Rosary, 153 are offered to Mary.
 
If the Rosary was the only prayer, or devotion of the Church, you’d have a point. As it is not, and as it does not elevate Mary above Jesus, you will have to try again.
 
Start a new thread and let me know. For now: is Mary Mother of God or not?

placido
Quoting you: “Why limit the answer to “yes/no”?” But to answer your question: No.
BTW, people don’t give birth to a nature … like humanity, divinity is a nature.
Was the divine nature of Christ “conceived?” Did it come into being? By the incarnation was it (His divine nature) transformed into a Childlike mentality, that of an infant? Did Mary nurture that divine nature from infancy to adulthood? Did the divine nature of Christ increase in wisdom and stature? Was the divine nature of Christ dependent on a woman (and let’s not forget Joseph). IOW, with the incarnation did the human become divine and the divine human? Do you like Eutyches and Cyril lay stress on the divine in Christ? That after the incarnation the human nature was assimilated, deified by the personal Logos? That the body of Jesus was actually a divine body? That it may be said that God was born, God suffered, God was crucified and died?
 
If the Rosary was the only prayer, or devotion of the Church, you’d have a point. As it is not, and as it does not elevate Mary above Jesus, you will have to try again.
No prayer is chanted more by Catholics than the Rosary. Do you not agree?
 
I do disagree. It is a very popular devotion, but most Catholics I know do not pray the rosary. That you would write that it is chanted, (which I imagine once in awhile some people do) speaks of your obtaining this from a suspect source.

I myself find the rosary a wonderfully meditative prayer to contemplate the Mysteries of the life of Jesus. Since the Mysteries of the Rosary are more focused on Jesus than on Mary.

A little honest fact finding would do you a world of good.
 
But where is this imaginary Catholic Church where people are exclusively told to go to Jesus through Mary? The Catholic Church I know has a Liturgical Year. And within that Liturgical Year there is a time when Marian dovotion is emphasised. But the impression being created here is like Catholics talk nothing more than Mary.

placido
One example is what I posted in #509.
These are the words of St. Alphonsus de Liguori quoted from motherofallpeoples.com/ar…-advocate.html. His book “The Glories of Mary” also says: “Whoever asks and wishes to obtain graces without the intercession of Mary, attempts to fly without wings” [Liguori, Glories of Mary, page 189]
He seems to be saying we cannot receive grace or salvation without Mary.
“What poor sinners we should be if we had not this advocate, so powerful and so merciful, and at the same time so prudent and so wise, that the judge, her Son, cannot condemn the guilty, if she defends them. … Precisely the same thing does Mary continually in heaven, in behalf of innumerable sinners: she knows so well how to appease the divine justice with her tender and wise entreaties, that God himself blesses her for it, and as it were thanks her, that thus she restrains him from abandoning and punishing them as they deserve” [Liguori, Glories of Mary, page 220]
Another example is the Church of the middle ages which taught a lot of crazy stuff that’s still in print and now has to be explained away with confusing words. ewtn.com/faith/teachings/marya4.htm
Mary, Mediatrix of All Graces
by Father William G. Most
Closely related to the Catholic teaching on Mary’s cooperation in the redemption is the teaching that, with through and under her Son, she is Mediatrix of all graces. What exactly does this mean?
The term Mediatrix in itself could refer to either the objective redemption (the once-for-all earning a title to grace for all men), to the subjective redemption (the distribution of this grace to individual men), or to both. It is most usual to use it to refer only to subjective redemption, i.e. , the process of giving out the fruits of the objective redemption, throughout all centuries. We must consider whether or not the term Mediatrix applies to all graces or only to some. We will ask also about the nature of the mediation: is it only by way of intercession, that is, does Mary simply pray to her Son that he may give us grace, or does God also use her as an instrument in distributing grace.
To begin, we can say without doubt that the title “Mediatrix” is justified, and applies to all graces for certain, by her cooperation in acquiring all graces on Calvary.
The Second Vatican Council (Lumen gentium ## 61-62), said:
… in suffering with Him as He died on the cross, she cooperated in the work of the Savior, in an altogether singular way, by obedience, faith, hope, and burning love, to restore supernatural life to souls. As a result she is our Mother in the order of grace.
This motherhood of Mary in the economy of grace lasts without interruption, from the consent which she gave in faith at the annunciation, and which she unhesitatingly bore with under the cross, even to the perpetual consummation of all the elect. For after being assumed into heaven, she has not put aside this saving function, but by her manifold intercession, she continues to win the gifts of eternal salvation for us. By her motherly love, she takes care of the brothers of her Son who are still in pilgrimage and in dangers and difficulties, until they be led through to the happy fatherland. For this reason, the Blessed Virgin is invoked in the Church under the titles of Advocate, Auxiliatrix, Adiutrix, and Mediatrix. **This however it to be so understood that it takes nothing away, or adds nothing to the dignity and efficacy of Christ the one Mediator. For no creature can ever be put on the same level with the Incarnate Word and Redeemer…" **(Well I’m glad he cleared that up.)

We notice that Vatican II did not add the words “of all graces.” However, as many papal texts point out, Mary’s role in dispensation flows logically from her role in acquiring all graces. (I’m confused now.)

Further, the Council itself added a note on the above passage, in which it refers us to the texts of Leo XIII, Adiutricem populi, St. Pius X, Ad diem illum, Pius XI, Miserentissimus Redemptor, and Pius XII, Radiomessage to Fatima.
Leo XIII, in the text referred to, spoke of her, as we saw above, as having **“practically limitless power.” St. Pius X said she was the "dispensatrix of all the gifts, and is the “neck” connecting the Head of the Mystical Body to the Members. But all power flows through the neck. Pius XII said “Her kingdom is as vast as that of her Son and God, since nothing is excluded from her dominion.” These and many other texts speak in varied ways of Mary as Mediatrix of all graces, so often that the teaching has become infallible. **

Now we’re back to equality with Jesus. Does that mean if we talk about something enough it becomes infallible?
 
Quoting you: “Why limit the answer to “yes/no”?” But to answer your question: No.
Naturally, I disagree with you.
Was the divine nature of Christ “conceived?” Did it come into being? By the incarnation was it (His divine nature) transformed into a Childlike mentality, that of an infant? Did Mary nurture that divine nature from infancy to adulthood? Did the divine nature of Christ increase in wisdom and stature? Was the divine nature of Christ dependent on a woman (and let’s not forget Joseph). IOW, with the incarnation did the human become divine and the divine human? Do you like Eutyches and Cyril lay stress on the divine in Christ? That after the incarnation the human nature was assimilated, deified by the personal Logos? That the body of Jesus was actually a divine body? That it may be said that God was born, God suffered, God was crucified and died
“Nestorius said that we must adore Christ as God because God dwelt in Christ. However we could not identify Christ with God, and apart from the indwelling of God within Him, Christ was a merely human Person. There were, therefore, two persons as well as two natures in Christ; not, as the Church held, the One Person of the Eternal Son of God who, possessing the Divine Nature from eternity, had assumed to Himself a human nature in time. Nestorius taught that Mary was the Mother of a merely human child whom God used as an instrument for our redemption. She may be called the Mother of Christ, but she must not be called the Mother of God. In the year 431 A.D., the Council of Ephesus condemned the teaching of Nestorius, and defined the doctrine that there is only one Personality in Christ, that of the Eternal Son of God who, after the Incarnation, possessed both a Divine and a human nature. Insisting that the Child born of Mary was truly God, the Council defined that Mary was the Mother of God insofar as God deigned to be born of her in human form, when the Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us.” Radio Replies Frs. Rumble and Carty, Vol. 2 No. 1248
 
Of the 170 prayers said in the Rosary, 153 are offered to Mary.
Actually of the 170 prayers of the Rosary, 170 are offered to God. 153 are offered to God through the Blessed Virgin, but to God nevertheless. All we ask of Mary is intercession. Trust me, I am sympathetic to your concerns. I am a convert to the Catholic faith, and I spent a year at a Fundamentalist Bible college. I know your concerns. Marian devotion and veneration is something that I still struggle with from time to time. But remember this. All Mary wants is for us to be united fully with her Son. The best way to do this is through the Church Jesus established, the Catholic Church. If you see Marian devotion for what it is, striving to come closer with Jesus, then it makes much more sense.
 
No prayer is chanted more by Catholics than the Rosary. Do you not agree?
Possibly, but they all start with the sign of the cross;the sign itself is a prayer and also the commandment of our Lord Jesus, He said to baptise in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirt. Did you notice Moon,in the Name of the one Triune God, and then prayer.

Peace:)
 
No prayer is chanted more by Catholics than the Rosary. Do you not agree?
Not everybody prays the Rosary every day. It is perhaps more well known to non-Catholics than others. I would say the most commonly prayed prayer by Catholics is the Our Father. Every single Mass everywhere around the world includes it.
 
And Jesus says “NO MAN GOES TO THE FATHER EXCEPT THROUGH ME”.

And you go to Mary? That’s just great, isn’t it??? :). Someone tells you to go to him and you go to his neighbor’s house. Interesting…
This is obsurd and you know it ! Rumpel. Does anyone ever ask you to pray for them, and when they do,do you tell them you cannot mediate for them. :eek:

Peace:)
 
40.png
moondweller:
No prayer is chanted more by Catholics than the Rosary. Do you not agree?
First of all, we PRAY the Rosary, we don’t normally CHANT it.

Secondly - I absolutely do not agree. For one the Mass is the primary prayer of the Church - said every day by every priest, and usually more than once on Sundays. And the prayer of the Mass is entirely Trinitarian in its emphasis.

Many of the very same Catholics who pray the Rosary frequently also attend Daily Mass. Personally I know I’m about 50/50 in terms of praying the Rosary and attending Mass.

Thirdly - I’d say the Sign of the Cross and/or Glory Be (doxology) trump everything in terms of frequency, being that one or other is said before, during and/after most other prayers, including the Rosary and the Mass.
 
First of all, we PRAY the Rosary, we don’t normally CHANT it.

Secondly - I absolutely do not agree. For one the Mass is the primary prayer of the Church - said every day by every priest, and usually more than once on Sundays. And the prayer of the Mass is most UNMarian in its emphasis.

Many of the very same Catholics who pray the Rosary frequently also attend Daily Mass frequently. Personally I know I’m about 50/50 in terms of praying the Rosary and attending Mass.

Thirdly - I’d say the Sign of the Cross and/or Glory Be (doxology) trump everything in terms of frequency, being that one or other is said before, during and/after most other prayers, including the Rosary and the Mass.
Here is an example of the frequency of Mass: I attend Franciscan University of Steubenville. During the regular academic year, Mass times are: 6:30 12:05 4:00 M-F, 8:00 10:00 Saturday, and 8:30 10:30 12:30 and 4:00 Sunday. This is at the Christ the King Chapel. This does not include the Masses at the Cathedral or local Parishes.
 
If Mary was the mother of God…that would mean that Jesus created for himself and us a mother worthy of the dignity of the Son of God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top