f that is the case, wouldn’t we all be called to vote for the American Solidarity Party because they have NO objectional platforms and are perfectly aligned with Catholic teaching?
Isn’t voting for someone who is pro-life but passive about climate change over someone who is both pro-life and pro-environmentalist simply because they have a better chance of winning morally wrong?
One might think that reality should have some bearing on the choices one makes when voting.
We have had more than a few elections (local, state and federal) which have been dicided by extremely thin margins.
Currently, and for decades upon decades, the US has been a two party country, with minority parties popping up and disappearing. The net result is that a third party vote can be one that, should some of those doing so had voted for one or the other of the two main parties, could have easily swung the vote, either for a clearer win, or a loss.
There is insufficent political power and will behind the minor parties to have any meaningful impact on elections generally; in conversations with some who have voted 3rd party, they have said that they would not have voted at all, and others ay they might have voted along with the two major parties.
The American Soplidarity Party is a voice crying in the wilderness, but unlike John the Baptist, pretty much no one is paying a whit of attention. And if by voting 3rd party the “lesser of two evils” is not elected, then I would suggest that the ASP possibly had a hand in that decision.
Which is not to sy that I think we will always be a 2 party system. There are enough moderate Democrats currently, that if the part continues on with its swing to the ultra left, may finally decide to leave - the question being where would they go. Possibly Independent (which I am not at all sure is actually considered a party), or possibly start a third party trying to recruit from moderate Republicans and Independent to form a centrist party. Considering the state of the Democratic party currently, that is not an impossibility.
The comment “wise as a serpent, harmless as a dove” is applicable, particularly if one looks at the real world impact of a 3rd party vote.