C
ClamDigger
Guest
They are speaking of the beginning of the earthly life of Christ, not the “beginning” of Christ Himself! Christ has no beginning or end!It is instructive and significant that each gospel begins with a “beginning”: cp Mat 1:1 (genesis); Mar 1:1 (archee); Luk 1:3 (anothen). And that the four gospel accounts are placed at the head of the New Testament. Here, in the coming of His Son, God has begun the work of His new, spiritual, “creation” – the corner piece, the foundation stone of which is His Son.
Okay? Aaaaaaaaaand, how exactly does this make Christ a created being?As a separate point, it may be noted how often the Greek “ktisis” (creation) – when used in the NT – signifies, not the creation of Genesis, **but the new, spiritual creation, in Christ, **of regenerated and forgiven men and women who bear his name.
It does not say “of”. Where does it say, exactly, “and the Word was of (tou) God” or “the Word was a manifestation (phanerosis) of (tou) God”? You read so much into scripture, it’s absolutely ridiculous. Where are the words “phanerosis” or “tou” in this passage, “kai Theos en ho Logos”?THE WORD: Jesus was a man (Act 2:22; 1Ti 2:5; Rom 8:3; Heb 2:14) who spoke God’s words (Joh 8:28; 7:16). Thus, one of his names is “the word of God” (1Jo 1:1; Rev 19:13; 1:2 – only 3 other instances of John’s use of the phrase “word of God”, all referring to Christ personally). In Greek philosophy, “logos” = an impersonal, abstract wisdom; but in Hebrew thought, “logos” = God Himself. Yahweh is the source of all wisdom! Here “logos” occurs with the definite article (“ho”) which serves to strengthen its meaning. Hence, **‘The Word’ can also be seen to be the “Divine Expression”. ****Christ was exactly this. **It was in Christ that God fully revealed Himself to mankind. It was through Christ’s life and mission that God expressed and illustrated His new covenant, showing us the better way – which is the power of salvation for those who believe.
WITH: “Pros” = facing toward or moving toward.
THE WORD WAS GOD: As John used the definite article (“ho”) to strengthen the meaning of “logos”, so here there is no definite article: ie, “THE word” was not THE God personally, but rather “of God”, or “godly”, or A (manifestation of) God. (In v 14: John writes that **“we beheld his glory”, **as of one who came from God, and was therefore “divine”.) This phrase is translated, “The word was DIVINE” (Moffatt).
What? Is affirming Christ’s divinity but not his deity? You do realize that they are synonyms, don’t you?John is affirming Christ’s divinity, not his deity. Christ was the Son of God, the ‘Divine Expression’ from heaven which dwelt among us, “the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being” (Heb 1:3).
Deity (de·i·ty)
The essential nature or condition of being a god; divinity.
Now answer these ones:This forms a much wider study on John 1 should you be interested in better understanding the beginning of that spiritual creation you only need ask.
In the Masters Service…SM
Why did Thomas call Jesus “My Lord and My God” in John 20.28? Why did Elizabeth, under the influence of the Holy Ghost, call Mary the Mother of the Lord in Luke 1.43?
