S
SIA
Guest
I’m sorry, but your mental gymnastics don’t pass for logic. There is no sweeping generalization. It is a fact that much of the Catholic doctrines and dogma do not square with Scripture. And as for Tradition, of course the Scriptures were built upon much tradition, but here and again if you are coming out with so called traditions that do not square with Biblical teachings, the so called traditions then would not be truth. And the the revolving door game with Scripture interpretation doesn’t cut it either. I can show you a dozen Catholics right now in my old parish that have six different points of view on Scripture and Tradition and a couple of them that are not too fond of Benedict XVI!Wouldn’t that be true for everyone, every denomination who interprets Scripture differently than you?
When I read statements like this I think; “Isn’t Jesus is the Word of God? And wouldn’t that make Scripture inspired quotes?” There’s a difference in venerating the bible and making an idol out of it. I’m assuming you know the difference.
This is another point that doesn’t make sense. Scripture - specifically the New Testament is born from Tradition and it took nearly four centuries to put Old and New Testament scripture into one volume. How can this statment be true?
This is another sweeping generalization that astonishes me… How does your interpretation of Scripture “square” with Anglicans, Lutherans, Presbyterians, Eastern Orthodox, Baptists, Methodists and etc.? Is your interpretation better than their’s? Surely it can’t be the same…