A
agangbern
Guest
Recommending to you, click this thread.Would you care to explain the trinity and assumption of Mary so that a hellbound infidel of average intelligence, such as my own bad self, could understand it?
And this one.
Recommending to you, click this thread.Would you care to explain the trinity and assumption of Mary so that a hellbound infidel of average intelligence, such as my own bad self, could understand it?
I won’t spoonfeed you when you should already know enough about Jesus to know this…when Jesus spoke this, he was stating the first line of one of the Psalms. Why? Because what he said on the Cross was in fulfillment of the the Old Testament of the Christ. In those days, they had to memorize what we call the Old Testament. They spoke the first line of a Psalm and everyone knew what they were referring to. Jesus did this very thing…the first line of a Psalm. It’s surely up to you to figure out which one…again, not spoonfeeding you.Then why was he talking to himself all through the gospels? “Father, why have you forsaken me?” Is this guy mentally ill? Talking to voices in his head? If he’s one God but he talks to himself I think he might need to go to analysis or something.
Come on, just admit it. It’s a silly story and you don’t take it seriously either.
That’s something that has occured to me as well. Why did it take the Book of Mormon for your faith to finally “catch on?”My question for any Mormon who’d like to answer: I don’t know if this is true (I know very little about your faith) but I thought you believe that after Jesus was ressurected, he came to preach to the Native Americans? My question is why didn’t Christianity take hold & spread like it did in the East and are their cave drawing or whatever that show that they had heard of Jesus? Surely it would’ve made a big impact? Otherwise, what would’ve been the point??
Just curious… thank you.
The bible is not a historical document. It’s mythology. Jesus doesn’t seem to exist in the history books, because there’s absolutely no evidence he ever existed in the real world. Citing one to support the other doesn’t work.You gotta know your Bible and the history and the tradition to know what you are talking about.
I respectfully disagree. There is alot of archaeological and other historical evidence for Jesus’ life, death and resurection. In fact, on Good Friday, my Parish was blessed by being able to borrow a relic from the genuine cross for a brief period from another nearby Parish. It would not be considered a relic unless there was significant evidence that it is genuine.The bible is not a historical document. It’s mythology. Jesus doesn’t seem to exist in the history books, because there’s absolutely no evidence he ever existed in the real world. Citing one to support the other doesn’t work.
You have religion, and you have science. The two don’t mix and were never intended to. Religion functions toward building a community and providing a framework for ethics, charity, etc. Science is a body of knowledge and a process for dealing with the real world. People who conflate the two have a shallow understanding of either or both.
Hope that helps,
LaMar
There is however, solid evidence that the mish-mosh of imagination, lies, fantasies and plagiarism that is the BOM is a total product of the imagination of Joe Smith or one of his henchmen. There IS solid evidence in the annals of history that the the Lord Jesus not only existed, but also worked miracles in Judea, as attested to by eyewitnesses. So much so that His deeds have come down to us over centuries of exile, war, persecution, martyrdom and opposition. The Bible is supported by archeology, the BOM is supported by nothing. If His life and ministry had not been of God, it would now occupy the same place as other ancient religions, namely that of footnotes to history. Your disbelief and cynicism have no bearing on those facts nor to the testament of history and scholarship. You are either confused, ignorant or angry, you pick.The bible is not a historical document. It’s mythology. Jesus doesn’t seem to exist in the history books, because there’s absolutely no evidence he ever existed in the real world. Citing one to support the other doesn’t work.
You have religion, and you have science. The two don’t mix and were never intended to. Religion functions toward building a community and providing a framework for ethics, charity, etc. Science is a body of knowledge and a process for dealing with the real world. People who conflate the two have a shallow understanding of either or both.
Hope that helps,
LaMar
mormon.orgHello , zerinus, and how are you?
I bet it is hard work doing what you do! Talk about a hard job! Knocking on doors only to have them slam in your face!!! But I would definitely be interested in learning more about your religion. Perhaps I judged you too fast, on the basis of what I read that was so negative.(i.e. The God Makers). DO you know of any links to information about your church. I will also look it up on the web. Blessings, and have a good day…
Tommy
You have shown just who the majority of Mormons are: understanding, tolerant, christ-minded, charitable etc. There have also been other mormons who have shown the same characterisics who posted on this forum. Hopefully the few catholics who have negative and intolerant opinions of the lds church can follow your advice.I propose a challenge to all here when debating faith. Simply, do not judge another’s faith. If someone states what they believe acknowledge it and go on, don’t tell them they are “wrong”. If this is done in the spirit of learning then you all might agree we have something very much in common…the Lord, our God, Jesus Christ whom we all love dearly and who told us to “love each other as I have loved you”.
God bless you all…
Brother D.
Ah the last line of Mormon defense contention… Jesus should have quit when he saw that the scribes and pharisees were so mad they wanted to kill him, and he certainly shouldn’t have ever whipped and drove out the money changers. The apostles should have never got people so mad that they imprisoned them and eventually killed them. If they had only learned the Mormon lesson on contention and obeying the law of the land they would have never said anything offensive and caused contention. As a LDS missionary our leaders reminded us often “if anyone brings up anything controversial, bear your testimony and leave, and heavy on the leave” I have since learned that this is the only real argument Mormons have in the face of the mountain of evidence proving Joseph Smith was a easily proved con artist fraud, call those providing facts contentious and leave (just as you did on this thread).To answer the question of why I stopped posting here is a simple one. I came here with an open heart, with the intent to discuss my faith and to ask questions about yours. Remember I said I was raised RC and my family is still RC and I respect their faith and love then dearly. I thought I would be given a chance here but my faith was attacked immediately. I then realized that the Spirit of God could net be present in this forum to witness the truth to anyone. The contention was too much. Contention is not of God. I returned and found the thread had grown to 18 pages and decided to read them. I did see a few LDS posters trying to defend their faith as well as many RC’s doing the same thing. I also saw many posters who really didn’t want to add understanding to the thread, they only wanted to ridicule each others faith. I was once like this, harsh and brash and rude and sometimes downright mean when defending my faith in on line forums like this one. But this is NOT the Lord’s way. It’s easy to say mean things and ridicule when behind the anonymity of a PC screen. I propose a challenge to all here when debating faith. Simply, do not judge another’s faith. If someone states what they believe acknowledge it and go on, don’t tell them they are “wrong”. If this is done in the spirit of learning then you all might agree we have something very much in common…the Lord, our God, Jesus Christ whom we all love dearly and who told us to “love each other as I have loved you”.
God bless you all…
Brother D.
(snipped the rant)There is however, solid evidence that the mish-mosh of imagination, lies, fantasies and plagiarism that is the BOM is a total product of the imagination of Joe Smith or one of his henchmen. There IS solid evidence in the annals of history that the the Lord Jesus not only existed, but also worked miracles in Judea, as attested to by eyewitnesses.
So, not only is there no historical proof forthcoming, but you also fail to provide some physical evidence for the reality of your mythology.You have much in common with Herod. He also demanded a miracle. He died of a disgusting disease. I do not, however, wish the same for you. You, apparently, have already received your reward.
I’m the one doing the tempting, and I’m comfortable with that. The competition is open to you also, by the way. If you change your mind, and want to make a quick & easy thousand dollars (which, with the way the currency is rapidly inflating, might be enough to take your kids out for tacos next week) say the word.first off, what you propose is the mortal of simony. secondly what you propose contradicts Jesus teaching “thou shalt not tempt the lord thy God”. Satan wanted him to perform a “minor miracle” too.
Mormons often attempt to show how their BoM is valid, by discrediting the Bible. You are doing the same, you discredit the BoM, therefore, the Bible is discredited as well.I’m the one doing the tempting, and I’m comfortable with that. The competition is open to you also, by the way. If you change your mind, and want to make a quick & easy thousand dollars (which, with the way the currency is rapidly inflating, might be enough to take your kids out for tacos next week) say the word.
When I was about 21 I read the Tanner’s book Mormonism: Shadow or Reality. I interviewed her for a project I was doing at the U about a year later.
Ever check that book out? Many here have a lot in common with Gerald & Sandra Tanner, even though they are fundamentalist Christians. They made a lot of perfectly valid points against the historical accuracy of the Book of Mormon. Unfortunately, all the arguments they made were equally applicable to the book they replaced it with (the Bible).