B
boog123
Guest
then hang them from a burning cross and lynch umThen run into them with a bomb![]()
then hang them from a burning cross and lynch umThen run into them with a bomb![]()
Certainly, however a number of people want to deny that Islam is our enemy. It is; itâs opposed to Christand then love them
Do I? Okay, if you want to judge me personally and youâve ceased debate, thatâs entirely up to you; obviously this too is how you show lovei bet thats how Jesus changed the world.
allowing a man to give his opinion then attacking it.
u donât care about the nine year old girl.
u care about your HATRED for islam
Iâd like to preface this by saying I am no expert on Islamic theology, nor am I qualified to comment on the meaning of passages in the Ourâan anymore than you are, or anyone else on this thread. I think we should all be wary of being drawn into some sort quotation contest to see who can best defend their positions. It would be best I think, to first read the works of qualified academics and theologians on the subject (as I have noted, El Fadlâs book is a good place to start, there are many others out there.) I would suggest avoiding any work that would characterize Islam as some sort of monolithic entity, clearly Muslims, of which there are some 1 billion (I know some of you here think this number exaggerated, but lets save that discussion for another thread) donât all think and act one way. I also think we all should be careful to avoid the pitfall of literally interoperating a verse, whether in the Qurâan, the Bible, or any other holy text, without first adequately understanding the historical and cultural context in which it was written. Now, Iâm certainly not saying that there arenât concerning passages in the Qurâan, or that many Muslims draw inspiration for horrible, violent deeds from these passages, just that I think some of us are ignoring the complexity of this issue. With that said, here are some verses I came across that I think suggest tolerance and non-violence:And which passages in the Quran condemn violence against non-Muslim?
Thanks,
Rodrigo
PS: if you want to use the Sanhedrin plagiarism - please read the entire verse - it only applies to the Sons of Israel - not to Muslims.
Thatâs simply not the case. Many times weâve confronted Islam WITH the words of Moslems themselves.Iâd like to preface this by saying I am no expert on Islamic theology, nor am I qualified to comment on the meaning of passages in the Ourâan anymore than you are, or anyone else on this thread. I think we should all be wary of being drawn into some sort quotation contest to see who can best defend their positions.
Welcome, newbie Tofu (said affectionately), and thanks for offering up your opinions.First off Iâm new here so please be kind to me as a newbie.
Iâve been reading this thread for a while now (its either a little slow at work today or Iâm lazy, both I suspect) and Iâve been a bit taken aback by the vitriolic comments in a lot of the postings. Iâd like suggest a few things:
841 The Churchâs relationship with the Muslims. âThe plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankindâs judge on the last day.â[330]
- To any Catholic here who would describe Islam as Satanic or demonic, or false religion I would point to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, specifically the following citation:
Where does the catechism call islam a âtrueâ religion? Where does it mention the word âislamâ?If this has already been covered, I apologize, I admit I have not read every single one of the over 400 responses this thread has. Nonetheless, I think this is very important, for Catholics at least.
To call Islam a false religion is to flatly contradict the Catechism, which no Catholic should do lightly.
Once again, show me specifically where ISLAM (not moslem people) is not seen as either evil or not-evilâŚ!?In fact, I have seen quite a few other threads suuggesting liberal Catholics who refuse to accept other elements of Catholic teaching (abortion, gay marriage) should leave the Church entirely. Now Iâm certainly not suggesting this for any Catholic here, Iâm simply noting that the Church hierarchy clearly does not see Islam as evil, quite the opposite evidentially.
Thank you, oh policeman of âtoneâ.ijtihad.org/memo.htm
- For all those who believe Islam to be fundamentally violent I would suggest reading âThe Place of Tolerance in Islamâ by Khaled Abou El Fadl, a professor of law at UCLA law school and a noted expert in Islamic jurisprudence. He makes a convincing argument why Islam is not inherently violent. It has contains some other essays on the topic which showcase the debate on the subject. A good read and a fairly short one too. Iâd suggest it for everyone here. I would also advise those who think moderate Muslims are being silent on the violence and extremism in their own religion to read the following article by Dr. Muqtedar Khan, assistant professor of political science at Adrian College in Michigan.
Just suggestions, I can only hope they encourage everyone here to tone things down a bit.
God Bless
i ia oe. Aloha nui.âTolerance does not apply to truth or principles. About these things we must be intolerant, and for this kind of intolerance, so much needed to rouse us from sentimental gush, I make a plea. Intolerance of this kind is the foundation of stability.âthe truth according to u.
if i were to post saying all catholics are wrong, according to u, i would be wrong, according to muslims your wrong.
telling them what they expect to hear from a christian is nothing new to them, just like them telling u your wrong is not going to suddenly make u change your mind and your beliefs.
telling other christians what they already believe about muslims does them no good also.
when u speak of the islam as violent and your belief that their religion is false,
(your Judging with a capital J)
because there is no need to acknowledge what 90% of the forum already thinks and has already acknowledged, and what the small percentage of muslims will already deny before u even type it.
and no need to defend when the majority here are christians and again, what muslims will deny.
This âislam is a monolithâ nonsense is not believed by anyone, therefore it is a sham idea brought up merely to confuse the issue.Iâd like to preface this by saying I am no expert on Islamic theology, nor am I qualified to comment on the meaning of passages in the Ourâan anymore than you are, or anyone else on this thread. I think we should all be wary of being drawn into some sort quotation contest to see who can best defend their positions. It would be best I think, to first read the works of qualified academics and theologians on the subject (as I have noted, El Fadlâs book is a good place to start, there are many others out there.)
I would suggest avoiding any work that would characterize Islam as some sort of monolithic entity, clearly Muslims, of which there are some 1 billion (I know some of you here think this number exaggerated, but lets save that discussion for another thread) donât all think and act one way.
Tofu, the issue is not that islam, as laid out in the koran and aHadith, arenât interpretable as non-violent (that we can all agree with),âŚI also think we all should be careful to avoid the pitfall of literally interoperating a verse, whether in the Qurâan, the Bible, or any other holy text, without first adequately understanding the historical and cultural context in which it was written.
Now, Iâm certainly not saying that there arenât concerning passages in the Qurâan, or that many Muslims draw inspiration for horrible, violent deeds from these passages, just that I think some of us are ignoring the complexity of this issue.
Simple theft from Genesis, and a suggestion to be ârighteousâ. OK⌠could ârighteousâ mean âkill the infidelâ here?With that said, here are some verses I came across that I think suggest tolerance and non-violence:
O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other (not that ye may despise each other). Verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things). Quran 49:13
Well, since once again the sura hinges on the definition of ârighteousnessâ, could ârighteousnessâ mean âkill the infidelââŚ?Those who believe (in the Quran ), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians ,- any who believe in God and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. Quran 2:62
Could âjusticeâ be defined as âkilling the infidelâ, who deserve the âjustice of death for promoting non-islamââŚ?Let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. ( Quran 5:8)
So, unless you agree that all those âprophetsâ are of equal quality (âwe make no distinction between ANY of themâ), which is impossible for a Christian to do, you are not a âgood personâ and may be dealt with as dhimmi or infidel, and done so ârighteouslyâ, with violence if necessaryâŚ?Say: "We believe in God, and that which has been sent down to us, and sent down on Abraham and Ishmael, Isaac and Jacob, and the Tribes, and in that which was given to Moses and Jesus, and the Prophets, of their Lord; we make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we surrender ( Muslimun ) Quran 3:83-84.
But, apparently, itâs permissable to âkill all mankindâ, as killing, as opposed to murder, is NOT FORBIDDEN in islam (koran AND aHadith!) as a punishmentâŚ!and this last one, though not specific to any one group, I think is easily the most powerful. I myself consider it beautiful and quite inspiring.
*Whoever killed a human being should be looked upon as though he had killed all mankind *Quran 5:32
Your personal interpretation of that last sura is âcorrectâ, and well meaning, as YOUR PESONAL INTERPRETATION.I think this last passage is a clear example of what Cardinal William J. Levada, head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, says, "outside the Catholic Church elements of holiness and truth do exist and that the Holy Spirit is working in those other communities and churches as well.â Anywho, lets try to remember that Islam, and no other religion for that matter, is as simple as people are making it out to be.
Gob Bless
p.s. I am not familiar what verse you refer to when you say the âSanhedrin plagiarismâ. I apologize, as I said I am not an expert on Islamic theology. Please do explain, if you have the time.
iâm not a christian, jesus teaching on judgement does not apply to me, but u on the other handâŚDo I? Okay, if you want to judge me personally and youâve ceased debate, thatâs entirely up to you; obviously this too is how you show love![]()
Jesus went into towns and cities and spread the gospels."Do not judge so that you will not be judged. "For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you. (Matthew 7:1-5)
But we know the truth, the way, and it would be wrong for us not to tell people who are in dire need of Jesus that they must turn from sin.
What âteaching regarding judgementâ does apply to you, BoogâŚ!?Quote:
Originally Posted by Montalban forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
Do I? Okay, if you want to judge me personally and youâve ceased debate, thatâs entirely up to you; obviously this too is how you show love
iâm not a christian, jesus teaching on judgement does not apply to me, but u on the other handâŚ
i ia oe. Aloha nui.So as to be clear, let me attempt to summarize your two posts. If at any point, you feel that I have misrepresented what you said or meant, please correct me, when passions are aroused and the only way to express them is by typing words anomalously, it can be easy to misunderstand one another.âŚcontinued from above:
Could âjusticeâ be defined as âkilling the infidelâ, who deserve the âjustice of death for promoting non-islamââŚ?
So, unless you agree that all those âprophetsâ are of equal quality (âwe make no distinction between ANY of themâ), which is impossible for a Christian to do, you are not a âgood personâ and may be dealt with as dhimmi or infidel, and done so ârighteouslyâ, with violence if necessaryâŚ?
But, apparently, itâs permissable to âkill all mankindâ, as killing, as opposed to murder, is NOT FORBIDDEN in islam (koran AND aHadith!) as a punishmentâŚ!
This sura tells me PRECISELY the aim of, or rather permission within, islam. That islam is in the business of killing all mankind if it doesnât submit to islam as interpreted by those who are sociopaths.
Your personal interpretation of that last sura is âcorrectâ, and well meaning, as YOUR PESONAL INTERPRETATION.
Iâm not worried about YOUR interpretation of islam.
Iâm worried about sociopathic interpretations of islam.
Are you seriously saying that we should NOT worry about those who act on sociopathic interpretations of islamâŚ!?
Jesus, and the apostles, and the deciples, told (tell) the truth to the people of the world. The âpeople of the worldâ very often find that that truth is that what they know of their religion is wrong.Jesus went into towns and cities and spread the gospels.
Jesus did not go into towns and cities and tell everyone what was wrong with the other religions,
It makes them more of what they are,⌠which in the case of moslems is more violent, bloodthirsty, murderous, and tribal.if there faith is already with that religion then what good would it do to tell them what they already hear from muslim haters anyway,
Moslem inculcated people will be a much larger portion of the worldâs population in VERY short order.i know, it will make their faith stronger which is part of the reason why in 10 years or so, islam will be the biggest religion in the world.
i ia oe. Aloha nui.itâs a geat teaching.What âteaching regarding judgementâ does apply to you, BoogâŚ!?
Is Jesusâ teaching on judgement a good one, or a bad one?
I find it very interesting that moslems, who no doubt would describe themselves as âmoderate non-jihadisâ, wonât answer the simplest question from a Christian with anything approaching coherence.
âŚbut then,⌠we are kafir,⌠and unworthy of anything but being given orders and doing them or being killed for our insolence.
Mahalo ke AkuaâŚ!
E pili mau na pomaikai iaoe. Aloha nui.
Did you change your profile? I was pretty sure the other day it said you were Christian.iâm not a christian, jesus teaching on judgement does not apply to me, but u on the other handâŚ
read my signature below, thatâs one of Jesus teachings that he spoke to the peopleJesus, and the apostles, and the deciples, told (tell) the truth to the people of the world. The âpeople of the worldâ very often find that that truth is that what they know of their religion is wrong.
That is telling the people of the world that their religions, which may hold some truth from God, is not THE truth from God,and is therefore wrong, and should be abandoned in favor of the truth.
Your statement is simply incorrect,⌠and you show yourself as one who has no idea what heâs talking about.
It makes them more of what they are,⌠which in the case of moslems is more violent, bloodthirsty, murderous, and tribal.
Moslem inculcated people will be a much larger portion of the worldâs population in VERY short order.
But will they be the greatest âpolitical powerâ on the planet?
How much of the moslem population will be âinsignificant antsâ in terms of political power?
Do you agree that islamic law should be the law of the land for the world population?
Will those who see the imposition of islamic law and islamic government as an evil (as I do) submit to it?
Weâll see.
Mahalo ke AkuaâŚ!
E pili mau na pomaikai iaoe. Aloha nui.
yeah i thought u had to be a christian to get on this forumDid you change your profile? I was pretty sure the other day it said you were Christian.