I'm sick of the rabid Islamophobia on these boards...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Generic_Man
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
i bet thats how Jesus changed the world.
allowing a man to give his opinion then attacking it.
u don’t care about the nine year old girl.
u care about your HATRED for islam
Do I? Okay, if you want to judge me personally and you’ve ceased debate, that’s entirely up to you; obviously this too is how you show love :rolleyes:
 
And which passages in the Quran condemn violence against non-Muslim?

Thanks,
Rodrigo

PS: if you want to use the Sanhedrin plagiarism - please read the entire verse - it only applies to the Sons of Israel - not to Muslims.
I’d like to preface this by saying I am no expert on Islamic theology, nor am I qualified to comment on the meaning of passages in the Our’an anymore than you are, or anyone else on this thread. I think we should all be wary of being drawn into some sort quotation contest to see who can best defend their positions. It would be best I think, to first read the works of qualified academics and theologians on the subject (as I have noted, El Fadl’s book is a good place to start, there are many others out there.) I would suggest avoiding any work that would characterize Islam as some sort of monolithic entity, clearly Muslims, of which there are some 1 billion (I know some of you here think this number exaggerated, but lets save that discussion for another thread) don’t all think and act one way. I also think we all should be careful to avoid the pitfall of literally interoperating a verse, whether in the Qur’an, the Bible, or any other holy text, without first adequately understanding the historical and cultural context in which it was written. Now, I’m certainly not saying that there aren’t concerning passages in the Qur’an, or that many Muslims draw inspiration for horrible, violent deeds from these passages, just that I think some of us are ignoring the complexity of this issue. With that said, here are some verses I came across that I think suggest tolerance and non-violence:

O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other (not that ye may despise each other). Verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things). Quran 49:13

Those who believe (in the Quran ), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians ,- any who believe in God and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. Quran 2:62

Let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. ( Quran 5:8)

Say: "We believe in God, and that which has been sent down to us, and sent down on Abraham and Ishmael, Isaac and Jacob, and the Tribes, and in that which was given to Moses and Jesus, and the Prophets, of their Lord; we make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we surrender ( Muslimun ) Quran 3:83-84.

and this last one, though not specific to any one group, I think is easily the most powerful. I myself consider it beautiful and quite inspiring.

*Whoever killed a human being should be looked upon as though he had killed all mankind * Quran 5:32

I think this last passage is a clear example of what Cardinal William J. Levada, head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, says, "outside the Catholic Church elements of holiness and truth do exist and that the Holy Spirit is working in those other communities and churches as well.” Anywho, lets try to remember that Islam, and no other religion for that matter, is as simple as people are making it out to be.

Gob Bless

p.s. I am not familiar what verse you refer to when you say the “Sanhedrin plagiarism”. I apologize, as I said I am not an expert on Islamic theology. Please do explain, if you have the time.
 
"Do not judge so that you will not be judged. "For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you. (Matthew 7:1-5)

But we know the truth, the way, and it would be wrong for us not to tell people who are in dire need of Jesus that they must turn from sin.
 
I’d like to preface this by saying I am no expert on Islamic theology, nor am I qualified to comment on the meaning of passages in the Our’an anymore than you are, or anyone else on this thread. I think we should all be wary of being drawn into some sort quotation contest to see who can best defend their positions.
That’s simply not the case. Many times we’ve confronted Islam WITH the words of Moslems themselves.

e.g I quoted from the Koran
Koran 5:51
O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliya’ (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliya’ to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliya’, then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrongdoers and unjust).

And then Islamic opinion on the same issue…
Allaah has forbidden the believers to take the kaafireen (disbelievers) as friends, and He has issued a stern warning against doing that.
islamqa.com/index.php?ref=59879&ln=eng
 
First off I’m new here so please be kind to me as a newbie.

I’ve been reading this thread for a while now (its either a little slow at work today or I’m lazy, both I suspect) and I’ve been a bit taken aback by the vitriolic comments in a lot of the postings. I’d like suggest a few things:
  1. To any Catholic here who would describe Islam as Satanic or demonic, or false religion I would point to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, specifically the following citation:
841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”[330]
Welcome, newbie Tofu (said affectionately), and thanks for offering up your opinions.

Notice that the word “islam” is not used in the catechism.

I don’t argue that most moslems “think” that they are “adoring the one merciful God”, or that they do do that, but the god of islam is certainly NOT the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, as portrayed in islam’s koran.

Therefore, while it’s possible that a “shallow” moslem (the VAST majority in my opinion) actually does have faith in the true God, in a limited sense, those who “know their islam” are in fact worshipping something other than God.

In other words, moslems may believe in the true God, if they aren’t well instructed in islam, but no “student” of islam is worshipping the true God.

Moslems “profess” to hold the faith of Abraham (though not the faith of Isaac and Jacob, apparently).

To “profess” to hold the faith of Abraham is not necessarily to “hold” the faith of Abraham.
If this has already been covered, I apologize, I admit I have not read every single one of the over 400 responses this thread has. Nonetheless, I think this is very important, for Catholics at least.

To call Islam a false religion is to flatly contradict the Catechism, which no Catholic should do lightly.
Where does the catechism call islam a “true” religion? Where does it mention the word “islam”?

If the catechism neither calls islam a “true” religion or a “false” religion, we are free to call it what we like.
In fact, I have seen quite a few other threads suuggesting liberal Catholics who refuse to accept other elements of Catholic teaching (abortion, gay marriage) should leave the Church entirely. Now I’m certainly not suggesting this for any Catholic here, I’m simply noting that the Church hierarchy clearly does not see Islam as evil, quite the opposite evidentially.
Once again, show me specifically where ISLAM (not moslem people) is not seen as either evil or not-evil…!?

Until you can do that, you are talking out of your hat.
  1. For all those who believe Islam to be fundamentally violent I would suggest reading “The Place of Tolerance in Islam” by Khaled Abou El Fadl, a professor of law at UCLA law school and a noted expert in Islamic jurisprudence. He makes a convincing argument why Islam is not inherently violent. It has contains some other essays on the topic which showcase the debate on the subject. A good read and a fairly short one too. I’d suggest it for everyone here. I would also advise those who think moderate Muslims are being silent on the violence and extremism in their own religion to read the following article by Dr. Muqtedar Khan, assistant professor of political science at Adrian College in Michigan.
ijtihad.org/memo.htm

Just suggestions, I can only hope they encourage everyone here to tone things down a bit.

God Bless
Thank you, oh policeman of “tone”. 🙂

The “tone” of this discussion is modulated by the importance of the issue, in the minds of those doing the discussing.

To my mind, the importance of the issue is very VERY grave. That you think otherwise is fine, but doesn’t “tone down” my valuation of the situation in the least.

Thanks Tofu,… you soft squishy mush, you…!! <poking fun!! :)>

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
 
the truth according to u.
if i were to post saying all catholics are wrong, according to u, i would be wrong, according to muslims your wrong.
telling them what they expect to hear from a christian is nothing new to them, just like them telling u your wrong is not going to suddenly make u change your mind and your beliefs.
telling other christians what they already believe about muslims does them no good also.
when u speak of the islam as violent and your belief that their religion is false,
(your Judging with a capital J)
because there is no need to acknowledge what 90% of the forum already thinks and has already acknowledged, and what the small percentage of muslims will already deny before u even type it.
and no need to defend when the majority here are christians and again, what muslims will deny.
“Tolerance does not apply to truth or principles. About these things we must be intolerant, and for this kind of intolerance, so much needed to rouse us from sentimental gush, I make a plea. Intolerance of this kind is the foundation of stability.”
  • His Excellency Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, Servant of God
 
I’d like to preface this by saying I am no expert on Islamic theology, nor am I qualified to comment on the meaning of passages in the Our’an anymore than you are, or anyone else on this thread. I think we should all be wary of being drawn into some sort quotation contest to see who can best defend their positions. It would be best I think, to first read the works of qualified academics and theologians on the subject (as I have noted, El Fadl’s book is a good place to start, there are many others out there.)

I would suggest avoiding any work that would characterize Islam as some sort of monolithic entity, clearly Muslims, of which there are some 1 billion (I know some of you here think this number exaggerated, but lets save that discussion for another thread) don’t all think and act one way.
This “islam is a monolith” nonsense is not believed by anyone, therefore it is a sham idea brought up merely to confuse the issue.
I also think we all should be careful to avoid the pitfall of literally interoperating a verse, whether in the Qur’an, the Bible, or any other holy text, without first adequately understanding the historical and cultural context in which it was written.

Now, I’m certainly not saying that there aren’t concerning passages in the Qur’an, or that many Muslims draw inspiration for horrible, violent deeds from these passages, just that I think some of us are ignoring the complexity of this issue.
Tofu, the issue is not that islam, as laid out in the koran and aHadith, aren’t interpretable as non-violent (that we can all agree with),…

…The issue is that it interpretable AS VIOLENT,… which it would be undeniably impossible not to do…!

I fully admit that it’s possible to interpret islam as non-violent. But that doesn’t say anything about the issue of those who stubbornly refuse to move off their interpretation that islam, as per the koran and aHadith, justifies violence, and calls it holy behavior.
With that said, here are some verses I came across that I think suggest tolerance and non-violence:

O mankind! We created you from a single (pair) of a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, that ye may know each other (not that ye may despise each other). Verily the most honored of you in the sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted (with all things). Quran 49:13
Simple theft from Genesis, and a suggestion to be “righteous”. OK… could “righteous” mean “kill the infidel” here?
Those who believe (in the Quran ), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians ,- any who believe in God and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve. Quran 2:62
Well, since once again the sura hinges on the definition of “righteousness”, could “righteousness” mean “kill the infidel”…?

Which would mean that Christians who kill islamically-defined-infidels are the only ones who are “saved”…?

continued below →
 
…continued from above:
Let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. ( Quran 5:8)
Could “justice” be defined as “killing the infidel”, who deserve the “justice of death for promoting non-islam”…?
Say: "We believe in God, and that which has been sent down to us, and sent down on Abraham and Ishmael, Isaac and Jacob, and the Tribes, and in that which was given to Moses and Jesus, and the Prophets, of their Lord; we make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we surrender ( Muslimun ) Quran 3:83-84.
So, unless you agree that all those “prophets” are of equal quality (“we make no distinction between ANY of them”), which is impossible for a Christian to do, you are not a “good person” and may be dealt with as dhimmi or infidel, and done so “righteously”, with violence if necessary…?
and this last one, though not specific to any one group, I think is easily the most powerful. I myself consider it beautiful and quite inspiring.

*Whoever killed a human being should be looked upon as though he had killed all mankind *Quran 5:32
But, apparently, it’s permissable to “kill all mankind”, as killing, as opposed to murder, is NOT FORBIDDEN in islam (koran AND aHadith!) as a punishment…!

This sura tells me PRECISELY the aim of, or rather permission within, islam. That islam is in the business of killing all mankind if it doesn’t submit to islam as interpreted by those who are sociopaths.
I think this last passage is a clear example of what Cardinal William J. Levada, head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, says, "outside the Catholic Church elements of holiness and truth do exist and that the Holy Spirit is working in those other communities and churches as well.” Anywho, lets try to remember that Islam, and no other religion for that matter, is as simple as people are making it out to be.
Your personal interpretation of that last sura is “correct”, and well meaning, as YOUR PESONAL INTERPRETATION.

I’m not worried about YOUR interpretation of islam.

I’m worried about sociopathic interpretations of islam.

Are you seriously saying that we should NOT worry about those who act on sociopathic interpretations of islam…!?
Gob Bless

p.s. I am not familiar what verse you refer to when you say the “Sanhedrin plagiarism”. I apologize, as I said I am not an expert on Islamic theology. Please do explain, if you have the time.
 
Do I? Okay, if you want to judge me personally and you’ve ceased debate, that’s entirely up to you; obviously this too is how you show love :rolleyes:
i’m not a christian, jesus teaching on judgement does not apply to me, but u on the other hand…
 
"Do not judge so that you will not be judged. "For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you. (Matthew 7:1-5)

But we know the truth, the way, and it would be wrong for us not to tell people who are in dire need of Jesus that they must turn from sin.
Jesus went into towns and cities and spread the gospels.
Jesus did not go into towns and cities and tell everyone what was wrong with the other religions, if there faith is already with that religion then what good would it do to tell them what they already hear from muslim haters anyway, i know, it will make their faith stronger which is part of the reason why in 10 years or so, islam will be the biggest religion in the world.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montalban forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
Do I? Okay, if you want to judge me personally and you’ve ceased debate, that’s entirely up to you; obviously this too is how you show love :rolleyes:

i’m not a christian, jesus teaching on judgement does not apply to me, but u on the other hand…
What “teaching regarding judgement” does apply to you, Boog…!?

Is Jesus’ teaching on judgement a good one, or a bad one?

I find it very interesting that moslems, who no doubt would describe themselves as “moderate non-jihadis”, won’t answer the simplest question from a Christian with anything approaching coherence.

…but then,… we are kafir,… and unworthy of anything but being given orders and doing them or being killed for our insolence.

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
 
…continued from above:

Could “justice” be defined as “killing the infidel”, who deserve the “justice of death for promoting non-islam”…?

So, unless you agree that all those “prophets” are of equal quality (“we make no distinction between ANY of them”), which is impossible for a Christian to do, you are not a “good person” and may be dealt with as dhimmi or infidel, and done so “righteously”, with violence if necessary…?

But, apparently, it’s permissable to “kill all mankind”, as killing, as opposed to murder, is NOT FORBIDDEN in islam (koran AND aHadith!) as a punishment…!

This sura tells me PRECISELY the aim of, or rather permission within, islam. That islam is in the business of killing all mankind if it doesn’t submit to islam as interpreted by those who are sociopaths.

Your personal interpretation of that last sura is “correct”, and well meaning, as YOUR PESONAL INTERPRETATION.

I’m not worried about YOUR interpretation of islam.

I’m worried about sociopathic interpretations of islam.

Are you seriously saying that we should NOT worry about those who act on sociopathic interpretations of islam…!?
So as to be clear, let me attempt to summarize your two posts. If at any point, you feel that I have misrepresented what you said or meant, please correct me, when passions are aroused and the only way to express them is by typing words anomalously, it can be easy to misunderstand one another.

Basically, while you agree that all of the above passages from the Qur’an could be seen as a call to peace and tolerance, you argue that it is also quite possible to see them as justifying violence, at least tacitly, if not overtly when analyzed with other passages that are more obvious in their call to violence and intolerance (take not Jews and Christians to be friends, etc, etc) You then go on to say, that it is these people who see the above passages, along with others mentioned in this thread, as a call to spread the Islamic faith through violence and conquest, that we should be concerned with. I hope that this is a fair representation of your position.

Let me be clear on my position. Those individuals who find justification for murder and intolerance in the Qur’an (al-Qaeda types and any others who would commit violence in the name of Allah) should be fought against tooth and nail. If possible, help them to change their way of thinking. If not, deal with them appropriately (capture them if possible, kill them if absolutely necessary–though I would still grieve for the loss of human life, no matter how despicable a human he/she was).

However, I’m fairly certain everyone on this thread would agree that violent extremist Muslims need to be fought. The issue that seems to be under debate here, is whether moderate and peaceful Muslims can rightly claim that theirs is a religion of peace hijacked by radical extremists. These moderate Muslims would point to the above passages from the Qur’an as evidence that violence and intolerance has no place within their faith. I believe they would consider extremist interpretations of the Qur’an just what you labeled them: “sociopathic interpretations of Islam.” From what I have read, many of these moderate Muslims would go on to say that those passages in the Qur’an that advocate violence or intolerance were meant for a certain time in history and that they are no longer applicable today. Why should we say that they are wrong? Who are we to tell these moderates, who we should be cheering on, that they don’t know their own faith? These moderates need our support in their struggle against the extremists in their own religion. By saying that Islam is inherently violent, we validate the extremist position and undercut those Muslims who argue for peace and tolerance. This is not to say that we should not be concerned with Islamic radicals, quite the opposite. We should be very concerned with them, and one way to fight against their hateful message is to not echo it.

(alright, I’m getting close to the word limit, I’ll continue in another post.)
 
Jesus went into towns and cities and spread the gospels.

Jesus did not go into towns and cities and tell everyone what was wrong with the other religions,
Jesus, and the apostles, and the deciples, told (tell) the truth to the people of the world. The “people of the world” very often find that that truth is that what they know of their religion is wrong.

That is telling the people of the world that their religions, which may hold some truth from God, is not THE truth from God,and is therefore wrong, and should be abandoned in favor of the truth.

Your statement is simply incorrect,… and you show yourself as one who has no idea what he’s talking about.
if there faith is already with that religion then what good would it do to tell them what they already hear from muslim haters anyway,
It makes them more of what they are,… which in the case of moslems is more violent, bloodthirsty, murderous, and tribal.
i know, it will make their faith stronger which is part of the reason why in 10 years or so, islam will be the biggest religion in the world.
Moslem inculcated people will be a much larger portion of the world’s population in VERY short order.

But will they be the greatest “political power” on the planet?

How much of the moslem population will be “insignificant ants” in terms of political power?

Do you agree that islamic law should be the law of the land for the world population?

Will those who see the imposition of islamic law and islamic government as an evil (as I do) submit to it?

We’ll see.

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
 
(continued from my previous post, please pardon the length, I am just the longwinded type of guy.)

Lastly in regards to the Catechism’s statement on Muslims and salvation. First I would say that the passage makes no distinction between Muslims who have completely accepted their faith, and those that have not been well instructed in it. It just says all Muslims, who, along with us Catholics worship the one God, are part of the divine plan of salvation. It seems to me, that the words “these profess to hold the faith of Abraham” are meant to simply be a descriptor of Muslims, not some sort of veiled statement of doubt about the sincerity of that profession of faith. Furthermore, as I said in another post, when one looks at the words and actions of our own Pope, it becomes very clear that he does not hold Islam as an evil religion. And I will assume that if the Holy Father doesn’t hold Islam as a false or evil religion, neither should I.

I apologize if I seemed preachy or overbearing when I said to tone things down. I agree this is a serious subject that warrants serious debate. I just think we should go about discussing it with a bit of civility and respect.

God Bless
 
What “teaching regarding judgement” does apply to you, Boog…!?

Is Jesus’ teaching on judgement a good one, or a bad one?

I find it very interesting that moslems, who no doubt would describe themselves as “moderate non-jihadis”, won’t answer the simplest question from a Christian with anything approaching coherence.

…but then,… we are kafir,… and unworthy of anything but being given orders and doing them or being killed for our insolence.

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
it’s a geat teaching.
them not answering your questions affects u in some way, OK
it interests u, ok.
your right there wrong
now what?
 
i’m not a christian, jesus teaching on judgement does not apply to me, but u on the other hand…
Did you change your profile? I was pretty sure the other day it said you were Christian.
 
Jesus, and the apostles, and the deciples, told (tell) the truth to the people of the world. The “people of the world” very often find that that truth is that what they know of their religion is wrong.

That is telling the people of the world that their religions, which may hold some truth from God, is not THE truth from God,and is therefore wrong, and should be abandoned in favor of the truth.

Your statement is simply incorrect,… and you show yourself as one who has no idea what he’s talking about.

It makes them more of what they are,… which in the case of moslems is more violent, bloodthirsty, murderous, and tribal.

Moslem inculcated people will be a much larger portion of the world’s population in VERY short order.

But will they be the greatest “political power” on the planet?

How much of the moslem population will be “insignificant ants” in terms of political power?

Do you agree that islamic law should be the law of the land for the world population?

Will those who see the imposition of islamic law and islamic government as an evil (as I do) submit to it?

We’ll see.

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
read my signature below, that’s one of Jesus teachings that he spoke to the people
but this, 1 of your quotes:
How much of the moslem population will be “insignificant ants” in terms of political power?
is not something i think he would say

it makes them more of what they are might be true, yet i’m sure people will continue to bash them even while believing that

no i don’t beleive that islamic law should be the law of the land, muslims don’t either, those are the terrorists that claim islam.

maybe u should not submit or should, thats up to u
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top