M
masha
Guest
Joseph,
I wish I knew what was in your mind when you posted those articles. Articles by themselves always feel so cold. I’m sure you know that no one is advocating going to Liturgy in Rhianna’s (sp?) clothing, and no one, as I see it, is advocating immodesty itself. I agree with you, in that a sense of modestly should be cultivated, especially in the Church, but we can’t cultivate a sense of modestly properly if we are at the same time developing a sense of prudery and loathing of the body. An overly puritanical “modesty” makes a mockery of true modesty, makes it an impossible and undesireable end, and insults the sacredness of the body.
The Vatican’s requirements really are reasonable, but the requirements from Manila (collared shrits, really?) seem less “modesty” requirements than stylistic requirements. There is nothing more modest about collared shirts or office attire. When we start letting our personal style preferences dictate how others dress, we’ve left the pursuit of modesty behind.
I wish I knew what was in your mind when you posted those articles. Articles by themselves always feel so cold. I’m sure you know that no one is advocating going to Liturgy in Rhianna’s (sp?) clothing, and no one, as I see it, is advocating immodesty itself. I agree with you, in that a sense of modestly should be cultivated, especially in the Church, but we can’t cultivate a sense of modestly properly if we are at the same time developing a sense of prudery and loathing of the body. An overly puritanical “modesty” makes a mockery of true modesty, makes it an impossible and undesireable end, and insults the sacredness of the body.
The Vatican’s requirements really are reasonable, but the requirements from Manila (collared shrits, really?) seem less “modesty” requirements than stylistic requirements. There is nothing more modest about collared shirts or office attire. When we start letting our personal style preferences dictate how others dress, we’ve left the pursuit of modesty behind.