G
Guinness
Guest
Because he thinks Biden is not very bright? That’s a conclusion anybody who’s watched Biden speak can reasonably come to.He’s just an idiot who has no business being President:
Because he thinks Biden is not very bright? That’s a conclusion anybody who’s watched Biden speak can reasonably come to.He’s just an idiot who has no business being President:
Because he thinks Biden is not very bright? That’s a conclusion anybody who’s watched Biden speak can reasonably come to.
Not a blueprint. More a vague suggestion. If he had a “blueprint” he could have charged Trump. He didn’t have one.Muller left a blueprint for later prosecution and/or congressional inquiry. And Trump doesn’t need Democrats to make him look bad. He wished Japanese sailors a Happy Memorial Day. He sided with the dictator of North Korea against a former US Vice President, on foreign soil.
And that was his only job: indict or don’t indict.Not a blueprint. More a vague suggestion. If he had a “blueprint” he could have charged Trump. He didn’t have one.
Diane Feinstein should be investigated because she probably knew she had a Chinese spy on her staff for twenty years.Why are there Congressional committees investigating the President? Partly because he has probably done illegal things,
That’s not the conclusion “anybody who’s watched Biden can reasonably come to”
Biden’s said some pretty nasty things about Trump, and some of his Democrat compatriots have said even nastier things about Trump, but so what. Saying inappropriate things is not grounds for impeachment.It’s inappropriate for an American President to say that about a former Vice President
But it’s okay for a former Secretary of State to side with a dictator against a sitting President, as John Kerry is doing in Iran?It’s inappropriate to side with a dictator against a former VP
But not inappropriate to refer to a President as a traitor, Russian pawn, or criminal? Okay, but I still don’t see how Trump referring to Biden as “Sleepy Joe” falls into the category of an impeachable offense.It’s inappropriate to refer to a for VP as Sleepy Joe Biden
Even if true, “tweeting beneath the dignity of the Presidency” isn’t an impeachable offense.The tweet is beneath the Office of the Presidency.
You are correct. I will fix my post.It was DiFi (Feinstein) not Bella Pelosi that had the Chinese spy working for them. But both women are equally despicable.
But I would definitely agree that Pelosi should be investigated, how much her worth is, and how she became so wealthy being a public servant.
DiFi should be thoroughly investigated too.
Why correct it? It’s just as valid as “Mueller’s blueprint for impeachment”.You are correct. I will fix my post.
Thank you
Ridgerunner, was it totally lost on you wishing a “Happy Memorial Day” is wrong on it’s face? There is nothing happy about it.I guess Japanese sailors don’t have any dead to remember, so wishing them a happy Memorial Day was pointless, right? Possibly you’re not aware that to most Americans Memorial Day is a day to remember all who have died, e.g., your grandmother, your friend, your uncle, etc, as well as those who died in war.
I had a “Happy Memorial Day” placing flags on grave sites at a Veteran’s Cemetery. It was a great group of people, and we had a lot of fun. Nobody felt the need to don sackcloth and ashes.Ridgerunner, was it totally lost on you wishing a “Happy Memorial Day” is wrong on it’s face? There is nothing happy about it.
Japan had a lot of war dead too, and they still honor them there. And now, they’re not our enemy, they’re our ally, so I’m not sure what is wrong with an American President making a remark acknowledging their honored dead on the day we remember our own.And, wishing a happy Memorial Day, a day we honor our war dead, to sailors of a nation that caused many of those casualties is just plain dumb. It is totally devoid of understanding of the place he was (a Japanese warship) and the people he was talking to (Japanese sailors)
What we have clearly discovered is the “left” are fundamentally a bunch of bigots.Even if true, “tweeting beneath the dignity of the Presidency” isn’t an impeachable offense.
I think there can be more than one at a time, can there not? To give a broader view per se’?..Thought it would be good to have a single thread for impeachment news and discussion
Come on, you’re better than that.I see your point. We should hate Japanese sailors because of what their grandfathers did almost 80 years ago, and show it, particularly if they invite one of us onto one of their ships.
The cherry trees in D.C. given to the U.S. by Japan don’t have the same meaning for Americans as they do for Japanese. But we didn’t cut them down even during WWII.Memorial Day is an American holiday, and means nothing to the Japanese
You’re right. They can’t understand reverence for the dead, and have no regard for ancestors.Memorial Day is an American holiday, and means nothing to the Japanese
To be precise, it USED to be beneath the office of the presidency. Nowadays anything goes. There is such a thing as “museum fatigue”, which just describes that the mind gets too tired and new information is not processed any more.The tweet is beneath the Office of the Presidency.
Not true. It was to investigate, nothing more. The indictment was made impossible by the “rule”: “a sitting president cannot be indicted”. No matter, what. If he would be caught in the middle of a murder in the Oval Office on live television, he could just declare “executive privilege”, and that would be the end. Of course he could be indicted, but if he can fill up either the House or the Senate with his co-conspirators, then he will not be removed. Imagine a mafia boss’ trial where the jury is comprised of his consigliore and his lieutenants.And that was his only job: indict or don’t indict.