D
drcube
Guest
The 17% must reside here.And that includes 70% of Republicans.
The 17% must reside here.And that includes 70% of Republicans.
And in Congress, sadly.The 17% must reside here.
Congress is just doing a political calculation. If more evidence is shown that hurts Trump, they will lose independents and make their own re-election harder. What I can’t figure out is why Senators who aren’t up this year are that scared of Trump. If they did the right thing and removed him from office, two and a half years of the Fox propaganda machine will destroy Trump’s reputation to these Republicans and they won’t get hurt at all in elections in 2022 and 2024.And in Congress, sadly.
That’s laughable.If you think that there is enough evidence to investigate the Bidens, then there are no standards.
Even without that, I guarantee you there is more than enough to investigate Trump/Bondi.
No not presumably. The facts also include the timelines. Let’s not forget:Those are facts. Presumalby however, you under the post hocv ergo propter hocv fallcy.
It is also a fact that the corrupt prosecutor effedstively scuttled the UK action against Burisma.
It is also a fact that the IMF, US allies, and the US wanted this prosecutor to go.
Ah, Soro’s organization…that was receiving over 60% of the State Department foreign aid monies budget allocated to Ukriane under Hillary Clinton. I’d look into that too."Shokin would not have been fired, said Daria Kaleniuk, co-founder and executive director of the Anti Corruption Action Centre in Kiev.
Yes, they are facts.No not presumably.
Glad you agree.Yes, they are facts.
If you say No and I say yes you may call that agreement, but I call it disagreement.Glad you agree.
I do as well but that’s not the case here. You were quoted as saying presumably to my facts, I said No not presumably, and you agreed they were facts. I call that an agreement by you on the facts I laid out.f you say No and I say yes you may call that agreement, but I call it disagreement.
No that is incorrect. I said that you presumably are are of the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.You were quoted as saying presumably to my facts,
There are laughable posts in this thread, but mine isn’t one of them.That’s laughable.
Ah, the fake “Soros” argument that every organization is secretly controlled by the liberal, atheist views of George Soros.Ah, Soro’s organization…that was receiving over 60% of the State Department foreign aid monies budget allocated to Ukriane under Hillary Clinton. I’d look into that too.
Are the 83% of Americans that want witnesses the ‘true’ America or the 17% of Americans that don’t want witnesses?The true one.
Ah, the one that buddies up to Russia. Not the true America then.Doesn’t matter.
Buck stops with Mitch.