Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
He was indifferent to publishing top secrets to Russian spies in the Whitehouse. I cannot forget that.
And General Kelly likely knows this is true. OTHERWIZE I have no idea sbout his concerns
 
Trump held up those funds to extort a news conference to help him in the election. That is proven. That’s currupt.
 
Maximus1 said:
Trump held up those funds to extort a news conference to help him in the election.
Click to expand...
The idea that his specific request about the Biden’s reflected an abiding interest in corruption in Ukraine is a joke.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

bylinetimes.com

Trump Impeachment: Separating Fact from Fiction in the Biden Burisma Affair

With his expertise in Ukraine, Paul Niland dissects the disinformation about the Oil and Gas company and highlights the real corruption Trump ignores.
bylinetimes.com bylinetimes.com
If I were to draw up a list of the most corrupt people or businesses in Ukraine, that list would be headed by one Dmitry Firtash. Firtash is sitting in Vienna trying to avoid extradition to the United States. His case is being assisted by Victoria Toensing and Joeseph DiGenova, the husband and wife legal duo who are both very friendly with Rudy Guiliani and, of course, (you can’t make this stuff up) were hired to be a part of the legal team working on the defense of Donald Trump during the Mueller investigation.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Yea, that cookie monster analogy works better with Biden, who bragged about his quid pro quo, to his son’s personal benefit.
 
Theo520 said:
‘corrupt’ that’s a powerful imagination you have, since no evidence of such was provided.
Click to expand...
I’ve already explained to you how buying hotel rooms that otherwise would be unoccupied goes almost entirely to the bottom line and can do it again if you still don’t understand. But everything spent in a Trump hotel is almost entirely an attempt to bribe Trump or a violation of the emoluments clause of the Constitution.
 
drcube said:
I’ve already explained to you how buying hotel rooms that otherwise would be unoccupied goes almost entirely to the bottom line and can do it again if you still don’t understand. But everything spent in a Trump hotel is almost entirely an attempt to bribe Trump or a violation of the emoluments clause of the Constitution.
Click to expand...
Did the House submit such claim as part of their Impeachment Articles with supporting evidence?

If they didn’t, then this justification is just in your mind.

And they didn’t, because it’s not justification except in your mind.
 
Last edited:
Ridgerunner said:
Actually, I did read the Mueller report, the “Russian interference” didn’t amount to much of anything and had nothing to do with McConnell. There is more than one “election interference” bill in congress. McConnell and others oppose at least one because it federalizes state elections; that is, sets up a federal authority to set up controls on state elections.
Click to expand...
The “Russian Interference” certainly did amount to a lot.

McConnell could allow the entire Senate to take up the bill and accept/reject, but he is pretty much acting a President in vetoing it. Why?
Ridgerunner said:
I would think he wouldn’t like publication of secret information. No surprise there.

But never fear, John Bolton could “tell all” he thinks he knows about Trump and Ukraine on MSNBC or CNN tonight if he wants to, and they would love it if he did. But he won’t because he’ll sell more books if people think they have to buy it to know the story.

His “one trick pony” book will be published before long and it will be just as big a nothing as every other witness testimony the Dems produced.
Click to expand...
If it’s a big nothing, then his testimony should be allowed. The only reason to block it is because it isn’t a big nothing.
 
Theo520 said:
Did the House submit such evidence as part of their Impeachment Articles with supporting evidence?

If they didn’t, then this justification is just in your mind.

And they didn’t, because it’s not justification except in your mind.
Click to expand...
Oh, what? I was explaining why Trump is corrupt - a comment that you seemed to have a problem with. What does it have to do with article of impeachment?
 
Theo520 said:
Yea, that cookie monster analogy works better with Biden, who bragged about his quid pro quo, to his son’s personal benefit.
Click to expand...
Wonder what ‘discovery’ for this trial will reveal

www.thegatewaypundit.com

BREAKING: Fired Ukrainian Prosecutor Viktor Shokin FILES FEDERAL COMPLAINT Against Joe Biden | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

After leaving office in 2017, Vice President Joe Biden Bragged about strong-arming the government of Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor.
www.thegatewaypundit.com www.thegatewaypundit.com
 
drcube said:
McConnell could allow the entire Senate to take up the bill and accept/reject, but he is pretty much acting a President in vetoing it. Why?
Click to expand...
I couldn’t say in this particular instance, but he probably knows it won’t pass and doesn’t want to waste senate time on it. There are probably dozens, maybe hundreds of partisan bills like that.
drcube said:
If it’s a big nothing, then his testimony should be allowed.
Click to expand...
Why? Bolton could go on TV tonight and say whatever he has. Nothing prevents it. So you want the Senate to take up time with that and other witnesses just so Bolton can say other critical things and prolong this endlessly, and all on taxpayer’s money. At least CNN or MSNBC and their sponsors ought to have to pay for partisan utterances. But it won’t happen because Bolton wants to sell the book.

Too bad. The congress has better things to do.
 
Against his sons personal benefit. He removed a guy who was not actively prosecuting to replace with a guy willing to.By He, I mean him, his boss who sent him, Senator Johnson and other Republicans, and the EU) and
 
Maximus1 said:
He was indifferent to publishing top secrets to Russian spies in the Whitehouse. I cannot forget that.
And General Kelly likely knows this is true. OTHERWIZE I have no idea sbout his concerns
Click to expand...
I assume you’re talking about the ISIS threat to put bombs on Russian passenger planes. Israel was thought to be the source of that intelligence, but you don’t know that. Nor do you know whether Israel authorized the release of the information. Nor do you care that the President has authority to declassify otherwise classified information.

But what are a few Russian civilians blown up in the air? Who cares, right? :roll_eyes:
 
Bring them on…
Both sides call out the witnesses’
Oh wait,the Dems only want their witnesses’:roll_eyes:’
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top