D
drcube
Guest
That there are all these lies about Trump? No, I didn’t. Neither did you.
- Status
7
7_Sorrows
Guest
No, you won’t believe that any of the lies I post are lies, so why waste my time. If you don’t believe Rusian collusion was a lie, you won’t believe anything else I post.
D
drcube
Guest
I would conclude then that anything you post isn’t a lie if you have so little confidence in it that you won’t even post it.
J
JapaneseKappa
Guest
–Trump
7
7_Sorrows
Guest
My confidence is you won’t believe whatever I present as a lie told by the democrats.7_Sorrows:
I would conclude then that anything you post isn’t a lie if you have so little confidence in it that you won’t even post it.
My confidence is I know the difference between the truth and the lies.
I have no intention of arguing further.
D
drcube
Guest
And I am entirely confident that I will not believe that you know of any lies if you don’t present any.
P
PetraG
Guest
It seems to me that the political risks for Romney were a lot higher than the damage he could have done to the President. It isn’t as if he didn’t know what his party wanted him to do or what would make him popular.
7
7_Sorrows
Guest
Mitt’s time in the spotlight has come and gone. He saw this as a chance to get the spotlight back on him for a day or two and be a hot topic on the political talk shows. He is not a good politician or candidate.
P
PetraG
Guest
It seems to me that the political risks for Romney were a lot higher than the damage he could have done to the President. It isn’t as if he didn’t know what his party wanted him to do or what would make him popular.
I know I don’t believe what Trump says when he talks about Putin:
That’s not doctored. I know what he said earlier and how he changed his tune later, and so does anyone who pays attention at all. Do his supporters really have that much amnesia, that they can’t remember when he used to brag about knowing Putin? Why automatically believe Trump about Russia, then? The evidence that he’ll change what he says as soon as he thinks it’s to his advantage to do it is too abundant.
How do they defend that–“oh, he was lying all along about knowing Putin, I knew he was lying and I didn’t care” or something like that? Well, then, lying isn’t something that bothers them? Fake news isn’t something that bothers them? How can they have it both ways? I don’t know.
Last edited:
T
Theo520
Guest
I wonder if he is thinking about challenging trump for the nomination
That’s the only way it makes sense
That’s the only way it makes sense
D
drcube
Guest
No, the other way it makes sense is that Romney did something unpopular in his own party because he felt strongly it was the right thing to do. I understand why that would confuse you as politicians typically do not act that way.
7
7_Sorrows
Guest
Romney challenging Trump? Wouldn’t he already have to file papers somewhere? I know there were 2 other
candidates challenging Trump in Iowa. They did poorly. I guess that theory makes sense. I am not
sure Romney could beat Trump. @Theo520
Last edited:
T
Theo520
Guest
I think it would be viable if Trump was seriously hobbled. Impeachment didn’t do it, but maybe something else is around the corner. Dems clearly anticipated the Impeach show was going to do far more harm than we have seen.
D
dvdjs
Guest
It is fascinating that this seems unimaginable to so many.
J
JapaneseKappa
Guest
Romney did something on principle instead of for self interest? He must be a Democrat!
H
HarryStotle
Guest
It isn’t “unimaginable.” It is just that he has flip flopped back and forth four times already, so it is difficult to know what he really stands for.drcube:
It is fascinating that this seems unimaginable to so many.
H
HarryStotle
Guest
You might find this interesting if you have not seen it before.
It does answer a number of questions vis a vis the preemptive attack on Trump by those involved.
It does answer a number of questions vis a vis the preemptive attack on Trump by those involved.
Last edited:
D
dvdjs
Guest
That is a far cry from 'the only way it makes sense".
P
PetraG
Guest
Well, considering the President flip-flopped on whether or not he had ever met Putin, Romney might deserve to get some slack, don’t you think?
If you’re going to accept it when Trump and his Administration repeatedly (I’d say habitually) directly contradicts earlier statements about the facts about what they have said or done, you don’t have any high ground left to stand on when someone else changes their stance on something.
Or, as Rudy Giuliani put it: “No, it isn
t truth! Truth isnt truth!"
Last edited:
H
HarryStotle
Guest
The two are hardly the same. I am not clear that Trump flip-flopped on meeting Putin. I thought it was regarding what was said at the meeting.HarryStotle:
Well, considering the President flip-flopped on whether or not he had ever met Putin, Romney might deserve to get some slack, don’t you think?
- Status