M
Maximus1
Guest
Trump told Pelosi in October there will be no cooperation because he determined the House unfair.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
M
Maximus1
Guest
This is not what happened. He told the speaker there will be zero cooperation because he deems the house investigation unfair.
Can’t rewrite now
Can’t rewrite now
Last edited:
M
Maximus1
Guest
Trump said it to Nancy.
M
mrad25
Guest
No he clearly stated what his team would do as well. Additionally, his legal team claimed the administration replied appropriately to these subpoenas and identified their constitutional defects.
The legal team highlighted the fact that House Democrats did not seek to enforce their subpoenas in court. They also casted the refusal to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry as an effort to exercise its executive branch authority, and accused the House of attempting to “bypass our Constitution’s system of checks and balances.”
The legal team highlighted the fact that House Democrats did not seek to enforce their subpoenas in court. They also casted the refusal to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry as an effort to exercise its executive branch authority, and accused the House of attempting to “bypass our Constitution’s system of checks and balances.”
Last edited:
A
Aquinas11
Guest
Ordered they be ignored.
Trump ordered non compliance/ non cooperation.
IgnoredTrump ordered ZERO COOPERATION will be observed.
Non compliance
Zero cooperation
Whatever you call it, why can’t you prove he said this?
As opposed to that, for example, he told attorneys to lawfully challenge those subpoenas that may not be lawful and let Courts rule?
You said you’re “100% sure” hence the question
Last edited:
M
Maximus1
Guest
They never objected formally on privilege grounds.
That’s the record. Like I said, double secret objections only work for Dean Wormer
That’s the record. Like I said, double secret objections only work for Dean Wormer
A
Aquinas11
Guest
Trump ordered Nancy to refuse the subpoenas?Trump said it to Nancy.
M
mrad25
Guest
They don’t have to until issued or after courts decide, they weren’t during the formal proceedings.
M
Maximus1
Guest
Objections to subpoenas ( written) do not exist.
Only Trump’s statement to Pelosi back in October
Only Trump’s statement to Pelosi back in October
A
Aquinas11
Guest
Ok so that was a misrepresentation that Trump “ordered they be ignored”Objections to subpoenas ( written) do not exist.
No source, pure conjecture yet “100% sure”
Credibility free falling
Last edited:
M
mrad25
Guest
Trumps legal team claimed the administration replied appropriately to these subpoenas and identified their constitutional defects. You may not have all the facts and evidence here.
M
Maximus1
Guest
They told witnesses do not cooperate.
They told agencies, do not respond to subpoenas.
What are you referring to?
They told agencies, do not respond to subpoenas.
What are you referring to?
M
mrad25
Guest
Exactly what I stated.
A
Aquinas11
Guest
I dunno , I read “100% sure”You may not have all the facts and evidence here.
Plus thirty years trying cases!
Last edited:
M
Maximus1
Guest
What written response are you referring to. I cannot disproove what does not seem to exist.
A
Aquinas11
Guest
They told witnesses do not cooperate.They told agencies, do not respond to subpoenas.
And what was your answer to your own question?What are you referring to?
Last edited:
M
Maximus1
Guest
I give up. You got me. Answer your riddle
A
Aquinas11
Guest
Like quid pro quo between Trump & Ukraine?I cannot disproove what does not seem to exist.
Last edited:
M
Maximus1
Guest
Sonderland alone proves that. At least as to the WH meeting. That’s easy.
M
mrad25
Guest
His lawyers response, an 8 page letter to Nancy Pelosi to start.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.