In his new memoir, Barack Obama relishes taunting Trump: ‘He was a spectacle’

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
twf . . .
But it also isn’t OK for Trump supporters to call it out when Trump constantly derides, bashes, insults, and mocks liberals and conservatives alike on his Twitter feed.
I think it is fine for Trump supporters to call out Obama’s name calling.

Just like I have never had an issue when conservatives have called out Trump for a ridiculous Twitter post doing the same.

Not ALL the name calling on either side has been egergiously wrong either. At least that’s my opinion.

None of the conservatives supported that misbehavior from Trump, and many, myself included, have called it out.

Just like they will continue to call out Biden and Obama, Harris and others as they continue it. They just have the Democrat-controlled media to act as their proxy so they frequently have THEM do the name-calling.

Looks better that way.

The leftists virtually never call out Obama etc. though.

But there is plenty from the leftist politicians too, to call out.
 
Last edited:
I’d say anyone who believes felons should have the right to determine the fate of the country through voting should be just as comfortable in trusting what they write in a book.
The question was if D’Souza should be listened to as a reviewer of Obama’s book. The reviewer is obviously a long way from being able to write a balanced assessment. However, you go ahead and listen to him, if you think he’s credible.
Anyone defending a goof like Obama for belittling the sitting President can’t ACTUALLY be bothered by the things Trump has said.
That’s just silly. You equate writing a book with being in the bully pulpit and speaking for the country? Trump could write ( ala his tweets) and be as nasty as he wants to be as a private citizen. The country (and the world) expect a lot more from a sitting US president who should be an exemplar.
 
Last edited:
Priceless.

The man shoved us further on the path of Bush’s war policy. Sure has a lot of blood on his hands.

Where are all the leftist anti-war writers and protesters who castigated Bush? Cat got their tongues?

Look for the return of Bush and Obama’s forever war policies and remember you voted for this.
I didn’t! And neither did hubby. Not the voters’ fault this election was rigged.
 
If Obama was smart, he’d never grapple with Trump, where Trumps bulk might turn the tables. He’d just dance around and wait for Trump to tire himself out, then move in and finish him off.
One jabs, jabs, jabs and moves to the right (Obama is left-handed). Don’t be backed into a corner. If he tries to clinch, go for his mid-section. If he covers up, throw uppercuts. Plus, with Trump watch out for low blows!!!
 
Regarding Hispanics, it appears they were the key demographic that voted against California’s Proposition 16 which would have restored affirmative action by race, sex and ethnicity. I was surprised it lost, but after reading the postmortems that were sent to me, I realized that the CA demographics have changed since the 1996 enactment of Proposition 209 that banned AA in the first place. The Hispanics are now in such large numbers in CA that many of them no longer feel they need AA anymore. Hence they essentially ignored the black constituency in that state. Will be interesting to see how it goes from here as CA is rapidly becoming a majority minority state; LA County is already there.
 
I didn’t! And neither did hubby. Not the voters’ fault this election was rigged.
Rigged for sure. And the evidence has been copiously posted here on CAF.
Admittedly not good enough evidence for “courts”, but plenty of evidence.

It was set up that way to be almost impossible to attain court evidence for (for example the post-dating of ballots. Now what?

Can you “prove” WHICH ballots were post-dated? No.

Ballots “counted” without supervision. Can you “prove” which “ballots” were counted without supervision? Impossible.

“Signatures” not analyzed BEFORE the ballot is (under supervision) separated from the envelope and thrown into the general pile of votes. How can you now prove which ones should be culled out? You cannot.

Sketchy registration requirements. Now that the votes are counted HOW can you possibly decide which voted were from dead people if you don’t pick it up earlier. How can you possibly decipher which votes came from ILLEGAL voters? You cannot.

Computer fraud found? Call it a “glitch”.

Computer fraud almost certain, but not provable with computers being controlled by a foreign vendor? Lot’s of luck “proving” that in a US Court of law.

Votes disappearing from Trump (but simultaneously added to Biden) even on realtime TV even captured on video without access to those computers? Not much you can do.

Precincts with 100% of the “vote” and other times almost 100% going to Biden?? I’m sure. But not good enough for a court of law.

Google, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter refusing to post negative news regarding Biden? Invocation of plausible deniability.

Big tech shadow banning (even now after the election) things that they don’t want you to see or read? Go suck eggs (tough luck.).

Banning of conservative movement leaders? What can you do?

Media giving questions to their candidates BEFORE questioning publicly? Hush.

Media giving free commercials to their leftist candidates disguised as “news”? Not so disguised.

No. This election was rigged alright.

And most people know it (many refuse to admit it though).

When your whole attitude is “the ends justify the means” (like the pro-abortion people have by definition almost), dishonesty like this becomes second nature.

As St. Pope John Paul II said of an abortion society. Tyranny is already there.

The election was clearly rigged.

I pray that my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ somehow uses this for good in my lifetime in a way that I can see.
 
Last edited:
Rigged for sure. And the evidence has been copiously posted here on CAF.
Quite an exaggeration. Two uncontested FACTS emerged from the election:
  1. Biden got more votes than Trump
  2. The candidate who gets more votes wins the election and takes office
 
Quite an exaggeration. Two uncontested FACTS emerged from the election:
  1. Biden got more votes than Trump
  2. The candidate who gets more votes wins the election and takes office
That’s not proven at all.
 
Everyone, PA. legislature hearing is on now.

Check your channels.
 
Did Biden get more HONEST votes than Mr. Trump? More LEGITIMATE votes? More LEGAL votes? That’s what must ultimately be determined. Just getting more votes doesn’t make a candidate a winner. Actually, if he has to obtain more votes through methods of fraud and cheating, he’s a loser. A winner obtains votes properly. He doesn’t have to resort to underhanded tricks.
 
Did Biden get more HONEST votes than Mr. Trump? More LEGITIMATE votes? More LEGAL votes?
Yes to each.

It is up to the loser to PROVE irregularities that would CHANGE the outcome. Nothing like that has appeared.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top