L
LawyersGunsAndMoney
Guest
How dare you, sir, a lawyer has never been wrong about anything.
My understanding is that they had a marketing plan in place which was tailored to create positive reviews on Amazon prior to the launch of the book. Apparently there was a list of 2,000 “marketing team members”. If I’m wrong or being uncharitable in my understanding please let me know.LawyersGunsAndMoney:
Sorry Mr,. Lawyer but you are wrong as so many other lawyers have been wrong. When a book gets excellent reviews by so many hundreds of people who have bought and read the book, and so few negative reviews, it does say something.saying “it’s popular and also he has a family” doesn’t prove anything.
even if that is true (personaly I do not know), it is a common tactic used by most publisher nowadays… nothing out of the ordinary.to my understanding is that they had a marketing plan in place which was tailored to create positive reviews on Amazon prior to the launch of the book. Apparently there was a list of 2,000 “marketing team members”. If I’m wrong or being uncharitable in my understanding please let me know.
Agree.Note that I have never read the book, so I’m agnostic on whether or not it’s good. Just pointing out that saying “it’s popular and also he has a family” doesn’t prove anything.
He asked 200 people to read a pdf version and then write a review on the book. I’m not sure exactly where the 2000 figure originated from, but it seems to be a common mistake that is starting to spread.AlNg:
My understanding is that they had a marketing plan in place which was tailored to create positive reviews on Amazon prior to the launch of the book. Apparently there was a list of 2,000 “marketing team members”. If I’m wrong or being uncharitable in my understanding please let me know.LawyersGunsAndMoney:
Sorry Mr,. Lawyer but you are wrong as so many other lawyers have been wrong. When a book gets excellent reviews by so many hundreds of people who have bought and read the book, and so few negative reviews, it does say something.saying “it’s popular and also he has a family” doesn’t prove anything.
There were 934 reviews of the book. With 89% giving 5 star and 10% giving 4 star ratings. It lists many as verified purchasers of the book (Kindle version). And you can check to see whether this is the only thing that a particular reviewer has ever reviewed.He asked 200 people to read a pdf version and then write a review on the book.
None of that makes the book “good.” I’m sure I could find an anti-Catholic book with a lot of positive reviews from Protestant readers. It wouldn’t prove the book is true or anything.There were 934 reviews of the book. With 89% giving 5 star and 10% giving 5 star ratings.
It was a typo - there were 10% giving 4 star ratings.I’m just saying the fact that it has a bunch of five star reviews doesn’t “prove” anything.
Perhaps you should read it first and then tell us if the high ratings it has received on amazon are warranted.I’ve never read it
It simply proves that those who do not buy into the premise will not spend $$ on the bookThe fact that there are so few negative reviews does prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there are few people who disagree with what is written in the book.
The book literally came out 5 days ago. It hasn’t had time to sit amongst the general public and elicit regular reviews.The fact that there are so few negative reviews does prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there are few people who disagree with what is written in the book.
I got an advanced copy of the book yesterday and I’m already on page 93. It’s hard to put it down… Very interesting.I have to say, this sort of encapsulates my worst fears about what the book could be like. I used to like Taylor Marshall’s writings, but he seems to be going more and more into conspiracy theory territory as of late. If this book is a continuation of that trajectory, I think I’ll pass.
867-5309??I got the number from a…
Classic!!!867-5309??
Loved that song…