P
Petrus1
Guest
But maybe not here…unfortunately
Whilst not the Council of Trent, Jimmy Akin back in 2002 wrote this article The Catechism on Islam, wherein he mentions CCC, Vat II, Lumen Gentium, Nostra Aetate, and Dominus Jesus. I thought it was a good read and explained various matters.I ask this for I did a quick google search and couldn’t find what the Catechism of Trent says about this issue.
You might find this article interesting:Uhh … are we sure that the Church says that we worship the same God as islam does because that does not seem right at all to me?
As the Council of Trent was focused on the Protestant Reformation, it is not surprising that they did not address other topics. Councils meet to address specific issues.Catechism of Trent
The Catechism of Trent is an excellent catechism.I right to assume that the Catechism of Trent reinforces to traditional position
841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims . "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day."
My understanding of CCC 841 is that it is a quote from Lumen Gentium and there is one line that is in lumen gentium that is not in CCC 841 and that is “as Saviour wills that all men be saved”.the modern Catechism present a… different view,
Unfortunately, some of the language in documents such as Lumen Gentium and Nostra Aetate isn’t as forceful or precise in its description of Salvation and the relatedness of non-Catholic religions. I personally think the ambiguity in some of these modern documents is done on purpose.I know that Vatican II documents and the modern Catechism present a… different view, changing the traditional positions about non-Catholics and their teachings, thank you though.
You are a Christian because you follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. Does that offend you? Muslims follow the teachings of a man whom they think is a prophet. His name was Mohammed. I think Mohammedans is a much more accurate term than Muslims.and his choice to call Muslims Mohammedans seems like an unnecessarily divisive and offensive choice.
So, you be fine with another religion what to call us, and never mind what we prefer.I think Mohammedans is much more accurate than Muslims.
It’s an amazing article, and just in the end I realised that Robert Spencer wrote it, the same author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades), book that I’m currently reading and loving. He does explain in a way I was able to fully understand what’s being said in those documents.As far as articles on Muslims, this is a very good article.
Do Catholics and Muslims Worship the Same God?
Well, we yet have some forgotten tribes here and there, and lost villages heavily controlled by fearful religious leaders, so this “no fault of their own” claim continues to diminish as the years goes by.In today’s era with so much knowledge, no fault of their own is difficult to claim
That’s what I constantly read and hear, and often realise.Unfortunately, some of the language in documents such as Lumen Gentium and Nostra Aetate isn’t as forceful or precise in its description of Salvation and the relatedness of non-Catholic religions. I personally think the ambiguity in some of these modern documents is done on purpose.
Much of the wording in the documents of Vatican II and the Catechism regarding those outside the Catholic church, were said in such a way as to be ecumenical and less offensive to those who are not Catholic.Are you accusing the current, valid copy of the Catechism as being “adapted” to fit some translator’s will?
It’s not an issue of translation, but rather it’s a fraternal way of emphasizing what we have in common vs differences and errors of other faiths. In reality there is little we have in common but it sounds nice when we acknowledge their desire to worship the same God of Abraham.Are you accusing the current, valid copy of the Catechism as being “adapted” to fit some translator’s will?
Wow!Are you accusing the current, valid copy of the Catechism as being “adapted” to fit some translator’s will?
Heaven forbid a traditionalist ever confuse the opinions of Amazon readers with the truth. It is a measure of popularity with consumers, not a measure of veracity.…which is at variance with the extremely high ratings that the book gets from amazon readers…
Again: the accuracy of what someone writes has zero to do with what a great spouse or parent the writer is and almost zero correlation with what academic acolades he or she has garnered.Dr. Marshall is an incredible person with a beautiful wife and eight children and author of several books. Here is his webpage:
https://taylormarshall.com/
here is some info:
About Taylor Marshall - Taylor Marshall
Dr. Marshall, a convert from the Anglican priesthood, is the Dean of Fisher More College where he is also professor of philosophy.
I’m not going to fault an author for doing aggressive marketing. Books on philosophy and theology need a push if they’re going to make the summer reading lists. (I don’t even know what it takes to sell a book on alleged intrigues in the internal politics of the Roman Catholic Church.)I shouldn’t need to be hustled into reading something from a reputable scholar.
I would like to add something else to my defense.“adapted” to fit some translator’s will?