I’ve always had a HUGE problem with this as a Lutheran. Knowing that I believe in a real presence yet can’t receive communion at a mass while the CINO who believes it’s merely a symbolic action can do so without a second glance is heartbreaking. It’s one reason I no longer will attend any mass other than a wedding or funeral. The whole “you must be in agreement with all the church teaches” line of debate doesn’t work. I know not a single Catholic who agrees with all the Church teaches yet they take communion every week even when their disagreements are well known and public.
This is a good post that shows both how the op’s in-laws perceive things and that shows the scandal caused to others when Catholics fail to live up to our faith’s teachings.
My husband was Lutheran–ELCA. If the op’s in-laws were Missouri Synod Lutherans or Wisconsin Synod Lutherans, it would not be an issue because, in fact, those branches of Lutheranism usually hold closed Communions as well, even to other
Lutherans outside their synod!
Anyway, when we first married, my husband attended Catholic Mass with me. I grew up with a lot of liberal Catholics and my husband believed more of the Catholic faith than many Catholics I knew. He was not allowed to recieve communion while they did. It was a big issue to him and to me. It contributed largely to my leaving the Church for several years. During that time, I attended ELCA with my husband. Eventually I returned to the Catholic faith and my husband joined me.
Catholics would truly
like to extend Holy Communion to all believers–because ultimately we’d really like for all believers to be in
full Communion with the Catholic Church, (in other words, become Catholic, as my husband eventually did.) In certain extreme circumstances, a bishop can grant a dispensation for non-Catholics such as Lutherans, to recieve Holy Communion. The op might talk to her priest to see if there is any grounds to request such a dispensation from the bishop.
But, it is a huge obstacle–scandal even!-- for Protestants to see Catholics who openly oppose Catholic teaching recieve Holy Communion, while our non-Catholic brethren cannot. It was
very hard for me to reconcile this in my own faith life. Eventually I did. Catholics such as theseare “excluded” from Holy Communion if they know themselves to be in a state of mortal sin. Even if we have not fasted for the required period of time, Catholics should not take Communion.
My faith and Bible knowledge grew while I attended my husband’s ELCA and that helped me see that the Catholic Church teachings regarding “closed Communion” are something done out of
love rather than snobbery or desire to exclude. Paul writes in I Corinthians 11
27Why whoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.** 28**But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.
29For he that eats and drinks unworthily, eats and drinks damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.
All Catholics should examine ourselves before receiving Holy Communion. Holy Communion is not open to all Catholics, and when Catholics take Communion without really believing and living what the Church teaches, it brings scandal to others.