Interesting article from a gay man about the abuse

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmaz
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wouldn’t necessarily call a man who mostly preys on female children and has little interest in women “heterosexual” since, as some psychologists have pointed out, such a person doesn’t really have an adult sexual orientation…
I know of at least one priest who targeted both adolescent girls and grown women who were in a vulnerable state. He was heterosexual, but he was also a very confused man. When a priest does things that aren’t likely to get him thrown in jail, that doesn’t mean he still doesn’t do a lot of damage…as in victims who suffer from depression and can barely go to church anymore.
 
People, gay does not equal pedophilia. I know a good number of gay men. A good number of them really can’t stand having kid noises around, much less want to do whatever demented stuff some of you are using to explain these sex scandals away. Do some prefer younger men, for sure. But where’s the last time an SI swimsuit edition ever have older women in it?
 
Last edited:
They’re not, you’re not understanding my point. There is innate homosexuality where people, for the lack of a better term, choose same sex partners. There is also situational homosexuality where heterosexual people will have sex with people of the same sex when there is a lack of other outlets. Here’s a wiki article to outline my point.
So homosexual activity is a choice? Of course it is. All actions are something we choose to do.
You have no evidence that homosexuality inclines gay people to be sexual predators.
Yes I do. People just make up excuses for why the evidence doesn’t mean the obvious. Anyone who knows anything about the decadence of pride parades knows that homosexual activity is associated with hyper sexuality.
 
He mention some clinical study or something that proved it.
 
40.png
Thorolfr:
You have no evidence that homosexuality inclines gay people to be sexual predators.
Yes I do. People just make up excuses for why the evidence doesn’t mean the obvious. Anyone who knows anything about the decadence of pride parades knows that homosexual activity is associated with hyper sexuality.
And heterosexual activity is also associated with hypersexuality. It used to be called nymphomania when referring to women and satyriasis when referring to men. But that doesn’t mean that all or even most heterosexuals are hypersexual and being hypersexual does not necessarily make someone more inclined to be a sexual predator.
 
Last edited:
exnihilo apparently seems to think that people with SSA are more likely to be predators, including you and I.
 
He mention some clinical study or something that proved it.
Even if the rate is a bit higher, the vast majority know where their genitalia belong. Remember the scandal mostly is about cover ups, not the priests. You are defending the institution not the victims.
 
How am I defending the institution by mentioning a study?
 
Last edited:
How am I defending the institution by mentioning a study?
Because by implication you are focused on the priest’s behaviors, not how the institution failed to address it. The scandal is that the church basically aided and participated in it by continuing to let them serve and covering it up.
 
exnihilo apparently seems to think that people with SSA are more likely to be predators, including you and I.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.) but I dont want to hurt anyone
 
Last edited:
Stopping the abuse before it happens will probably be very helpful and if it is linked with homosexuality it would be wise to fix the problem. I don’t what exactly happened with the coverups so I won’t dwell on it too much.
 
Only in the modern world would someone need data to back up a claim that a person with a disorder would be more likely to act in a disordered way
Data is definitely not a bad thing but the need to have data for everything, especially the obvious, is a modern notion. Delaying action on the obvious while waiting for data is not a good thing in general. The vast amount of everything accepted by man has not be scientifically proven or pointed to by data in studies.
 
Thank you for saying that. Not to mention that the LGBT community wants NOTHING to do with pedophiles and child molesters so to say that people who identify as LGBT are like that is a bit of a stretch in my opinion.
 
There’s a whole bunch of “conservative” (or more accurately, anti LGBT) trolls posing as gay pedophiles to make people angry at the community for supporting pedophiles. So I’m usually extremely skeptical when it comes to stuff like thing. There seems to be an agenda.

No normal person, gay or not, would support such a horrible thing. And as mentioned earlier, we need to focus on preventing sexual abuse from all kinds of people, not just homosexual men.
 
You may not have had the misfortune to suffer a temporary mental illness or even a neurosis.
If there is one thing that makes self control in the sexual area go haywire its a long period of extreme social isolation, lack of meaningful personal connections and depression…
Look, I’ve known and had contact with a good number of gay men. They are not different in their level of mental health than other groups…other than the fact that there are a good number that are rejected by their families and the young ones end up living on the street. You help their mental health by coming to terms with the fact that many knew their sexual orientation well before adulthood.
 
Stopping the abuse before it happens will probably be very helpful and if it is linked with homosexuality it would be wise to fix the problem. I don’t what exactly happened with the coverups so I won’t dwell on it too much.
It would be good then to understand what happened during the cover ups before postulating that one sub-group of Priests was most likely the cause. Of course stopping abuse beforehand is highly desirable, but again demanding the Church deal with reality instead of protecting its image is where the real solution lays.
 
The sex scandals in the church are overwhelming pedophilic, not homosexual. There is a difference between being attracted to the same sex, and being attracted to children. There is a huge difference. Im not saying either is right, but same sex attraction is not child attraction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top