R
rcwitness
Guest
That is NOT in line with Catholic Teaching.
To justify all divorce, by all spouses is terribly wrong.
To justify all divorce, by all spouses is terribly wrong.
This Church requires civil divorce to be able to annulment a sacramental marriage.The Catholic Church still today understands that separation and even civil divorce that does not presume to end a sacramental marriage is sometimes necessary (e.g., in the case of an abusive spouse). But such actions simply cannot dissolve the marital bond or free the spouses to marry others.
Those with empathy do this every day, and it is a good thing we do. They make a judgement about how they believe someone else will feel and what the impact will be of whatever is being considered. I don’t know why you keep saying this.I’ve already told you, we should not judge how we think someone will react to something.
That is a very poor assumption. Why would you assume moral advice isn’t being offered? Pastors offer moral advice on this sort of thing all the time. I still am not getting why you think it needs to be formalized with a letter.What good is a busy pastor, while 50% of his parish is divorcing, and he isnt offering his moral advice?
It certainly can be a sin. Under the section " OFFENSES AGAINST THE DIGNITY OF MARRIAGE from the Catechism:Firstly, again civilly divorcing is not a sin.
The Church does not make sin a requirement in receiving an annulment. If an annulment is warranted, ie a sacramental marriage never existed, then obtaining the divorce would not have been a sin.[2383] The separation of spouses while maintaining the marriage bond can be legitimate in certain cases provided for by canon law.177
If civil divorce remains the only possible way of ensuring certain legal rights, the care of the children, or the protection of inheritance, it can be tolerated and does not constitute a moral offense.
[2384] Divorce is a grave offense against the natural law. It claims to break the contract, to which the spouses freely consented, to live with each other till death. Divorce does injury to the covenant of salvation, of which sacramental marriage is the sign. Contracting a new union, even if it is recognized by civil law, adds to the gravity of the rupture: the remarried spouse is then in a situation of public and permanent adultery:
If a husband, separated from his wife, approaches another woman, he is an adulterer because he makes that woman commit adultery, and the woman who lives with him is an adulteress, because she has drawn another’s husband to herself.178
2385 Divorce is immoral also because it introduces disorder into the family and into society. This disorder brings grave harm to the deserted spouse, to children traumatized by the separation of their parents and often torn between them, and because of its contagious effect which makes it truly a plague on society.
[2386] It can happen that one of the spouses is the innocent victim of a divorce decreed by civil law; this spouse therefore has not contravened the moral law. There is a considerable difference between a spouse who has sincerely tried to be faithful to the sacrament of marriage and is unjustly abandoned, and one who through his own grave fault destroys a canonically valid marriage.179
By reading some of your posts in other threads, I wonder if it might not be helpful for you to take a course or two in basic human psychology and relationships.Yes. If a pastor wrote someone a letter stating they are not justified to divorce their spouse, then you might reconsider.
I think if a pastor refuses to invite a spouse to a conversation, they’re unlikely to write a letter saying they disapprove of the divorce.f a spouse will not meet with a pastor, and a pastor refuses to invite them, then I think we should ask the pastor to write a letter stating that they do not approve of a divorce in that situation.