G
Glark
Guest
It’s funny you should mention that - Darwin’s books were the very first science-fiction novels. The trouble is, a lot of folks took them seriously - and still do!I wouldn’t write fiction that was infinitely flexible.
It’s funny you should mention that - Darwin’s books were the very first science-fiction novels. The trouble is, a lot of folks took them seriously - and still do!I wouldn’t write fiction that was infinitely flexible.
It’s entirely possible.Would the Catechism and it’s error of fitting an evolutionist perspective be the work of the devil then?
God took one of Adam rib’s and created Eve. How long do you think it took God to make a woman out of rib? I imagine it was instantaneous.Where exactly is the word “immediately” anywhere in that teaching?
Good, but If a Cardinal can get away with it, then you can too - should you feel inclined.Some may very well call Adam and Eve were figurative, but that is not my position
I don’t know, but the vast majority of Church Fathers believed in a literal “24-hour day” interpretation.Which document supports a 24 hour day for those six days?
I’d be a fool to rely on an atheist cult (aka the scientific community) to inform me about the origins of life and man.It could be nonsense and could be good sense.
No they do not. Bees build cells close together and try to build the cells outwards. That outward pressure in each individual cell results in the hexagonal pattern.How do they know to build honeycomb cells in hexagonal shapes? They must have engineering degrees.
You would be mistaken. The Church allows you to believe that. She does not insist on it. That would be dogma.anon65111186:![]()
The Church teaches that the faithful can believe in a literal “six days” interpretation of Genesis, thereby completely rejecting evolution. I would call that being allowed to be “dogmatic against evolution.”the Church prohibits us to be dogmatic against evolution.
It shouldn’t be that hard to build little mini ones that they could fit in.Do you think bees will ever build a space ship?
How does going to the galapagos islands and recording exactly what he witnessed and developing an explanation for the differences in species amount to fiction?Darwin’s books were the very first science-fiction novels.
Because it doesn’t agree with your position doesn’t make it wrong. Unless you are infallible, which I very highly doubt.It’s entirely possible.
I knew that was your assumption! That is your central error. The fact that there were Saints, priests and millions of faithful Catholics disproves that it is athiest, for no holy person would belong to such a group. You know that the Catholics were among the first to develop modern science, right?I’d be a fool to rely on an atheist cult (aka the scientific community) to inform me about the origins of life and man.
The Fathers are authorities on faith and morals, and whether it was a 24 hour day or not doesn’t seem to fall into that realm. Even the pope has warned that theologians and scientists stick to their own fields of expertise.I don’t know, but the vast majority of Church Fathers believed in a literal “24-hour day” interpretation.
The Letter speaks of deeds; Allegory to faith;
The Moral how to act; Anagogy our destiny.87
But I would not believe in the Gospel, had not the authority of the Catholic Church already moved me.89Exactly, the deed of forming man from the dust is a fact, not a method or a detailed description of the process. It doesn’t tell us the exact how or the time frame.The Letter speaks of deeds; Allegory to faith;
The Moral how to act; Anagogy our destiny.87