E
EasterJoy
Guest
OK, try this. Let us say that some particular Jews lack the grace of faith to believe in Jesus Christ. Which of the following would be the best?That is the problem, “in the same sense” is being used to get to a legalism that denotes a return to the 613 Pharisaical laws for salvation. It seems to say that f this is followed by the faithful, we know exactly what we need to do for salvation and we can know we are saved, making our path a sure one based on doctrine.
The teachings of the Church to me lead me to the mystery of sanctifying grace and not as a set of laws some of which are clearly being used in a sense that lacks charity. There is absolutely a narrow road, a defined doctrine, and there is a false caricature of faith that is the result of not doing the Will of the Father but our own will.
The narrow road is a spiritual path that defines our actions in accordance with God’s revelation. The defined doctrine is that which keeps us from being fooled by a false spirit, even our own spirit. Doing the Will of the Father is so much more than doctrine as if we could look in a book and find what we are to do in a particular situation. This is the book that is being written by those who seemingly don’t trust the metaphysical but rely solely on the temporal sense of what the words of doctrine mean. It is leading to a very narrow definition of Catholic Christianity that replaces the mystical “Union with God” with doctrine as its heart and soul.
a) remain Jewish, continuing to identify with God’s chosen people and the practices of their ancestors, who look forward to the promised Messiah
b) switch to Islam, deciding that Jesus was one of the great prophets of God
c) decide that God does not exist, and settle in as contented atheists who do their best to make a contribution to humanity
d) decide that monotheistic religions are tribal expressions of a common human contact with a universal power that is the spirit-force in all humanity, and worship that spirit-force through a modern interpretation of Druidic and other spiritual “traditions” which reverenced the supernatural within the natural world.
e) decide that it is impossible to know anything of the spiritual world, and become an agnostic.
These (b-e) are all directions that Jews go, when they leave Judaism, not to mention those who remain nominally Jewish but who don’t make much of an effort when it comes to actually having a relationship to God. Becoming secular or Unitarian is by far more common than becoming Catholic. (A Jewish friend of mine told me this joke: "Did you hear Daniel died? His funeral is Friday? Really, where is it? The Unitarian Church. Unitarian, really? I didn’t know Daniel was Jewish.)
Should we not pray that this doesn’t happen to them? God will save all Israel, by bringing them to Christ and by that means alone. If they’re not joining us, they need to stay where they are.
It is like being lost in the woods and not seeing which path to take: I think it is pretty clear that a Jew who does not convert to Catholicism does best to stay put, and I don’t see a thing wrong with praying that way. And remember: we do pray on Good Friday that those who don’t believe in Christ will come to the faith. We don’t leave that out. We just don’t single out the Jews as being in need of it.
But again: it does not matter how I see it. It matters that the Holy Father sees it this way, and that this way of seeing it is not heretical. It is within the Holy Father’s pastoral office to approach the problem as our past 3 Popes have. It is not heresy. You may not like it, you are free to say so, but they do rightly have the authority to what they’re doing..