Is it ok to listen to Dr Taylor Marshall?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moniabay
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Donkey said:
Dr. Taylor going live on youtube at 4pm eastern.
40.png
Aquinas11:
Amazing video so far
Click to expand...
Donkey said:
I wasn’t aware of the HIV benefit concerts in the Austrian Catholic Church before watching.
Those concerts were totally sacrilegious and some one should be held accountable.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
I watched the video. What I saw happening in the Catholic church there in Austria is just horrible and yes absolutely sacrilegious. I am just speechless to know that a Cardinal of the Church has allowed this to happen in a Cathedral.

We might not agree with every thing Taylor Marshall says but I am glad that someone is pointing out what is going on in Churches today. I was impressed by Alexander Tschugguel, Dr. Marshall’s guest, asking several times in the video to pray for the people that seem so broken that were a part of this horrible event.
 
Last edited:
MagdalenaRita said:
We might not agree with every thing Taylor Marshall says but I am glad that someone is pointing out what is going on in Churches today.
Click to expand...
In today’s offering by Dr. Marshall describes how individuals are being boxed out and blacked out for speaking up. I don’t always rely on people like Dr. Marshall, etc. for information. Most of the time I am looking around thanks to the internet. Even the internet is proving to be a challenge because of various filters.
 
Last edited:
Taylor Marshall now expends more effort on showing what’s “wrong” with Catholicism today, no matter what it takes to “prove” that, than he is in showing his speculations are true.
Taylor Marshall’s videos has become full of speculations. As his video on Fulton Sheen

First I want to state that I hope the beatification for Fulton Sheen will go ahead. I find his videos and his words to be uplifting, insightful, and brilliant.
As for the tug-of-war between Catholic dioceses over the relics of Fulton Sheen.
Christine Niles mentions Cardinal Egan’s. It was verbal promise that the Fulton Sheen’s remains would be transferred to Peoria. But what Christine fails to mention that Cardinal Dolan, (who became the archbishop of New York after Cardinal Egan retired in 2009), dismissed the request because the archdiocese had no evidence of such a promise and argued for Sheen to stay at St. Patrick’s Cathedral. Furthermore, Sheen’s will states that his wish was to be buried in New York.
Even Msgr. Hilary Franco (who was a longtime associate and friend, mentor of Fulton Sheen) states:
I’m convinced that the court will find that Archbishop Sheen is indeed buried where he wished to be interred (New York) and that there’s no evidence at all that he would have wanted to be buried in Peoria or anywhere else in the world.
I say this with confidence because I talked to him about the subject on several occasions.

But Christine Niles says that “New York had no desire to start the cause for Sheen” and that
“they hated him there”. Speculating, they hated him/Fulton Sheen there/New York.
Also in the video they’re speculating who “put the breaks on” and saying “Sheen is not going to be beatified now, there is an indefinite pause” going as far as putting up a picture of four men when this topic comes up. But, in reality it has been postponed.
But hey, when you have an agenda to push…
 
JimmyDFG said:
But what Christine fails to mention that Cardinal Dolan, (who became the archbishop of New York after Cardinal Egan retired in 2009), dismissed the request because the archdiocese had no evidence of such a promise and argued for Sheen to stay at St. Patrick’s Cathedral.
Click to expand...
If I remember right in the video, she is telling the story and doesn’t add all the details and says, “to make a long story short”, which usually means there are more details not being mentioned and there are quite a few more details in the story, even more than what you added.
JimmyDFG said:
But hey, when you have an agenda to push…
Click to expand...
So, if no one else and only Taylor Marshall and Christine Niles had been speculating and voiceing what they thought the reasons for the postponement were, I guess we could say there was an agenda but as I am sure you noticed when watching the video there were several others that were using the postponement to attack Bishop Fulton Sheen. Fortunately one apologized and the other updated their story.

There is a thread on the postponement of the beatification.
 
Last edited:
Dr Marshll and Professor Tim are only telling 1/4th of the scandals and overall problems destroying our church … most of the church problems/abuse are OUTSIDE the Roman Catholic Church but Taylor/ Tim position everything as “corrupt clergy”, “Smoke of Satan” or V2 … these issues not the problems we face today AT ALL!
Taylor and Tim will never tell you the real problems that is pressuring and forcing the scandals in the church.
I’ll also add, some of the abuse cases Taylor, Tim and Church Militant interview are not true. That doesn’t mean Taylor, Tim and Church Militant don’t believe these victims are lying about their abuse.
The way the church is being weakened/attacked is through very public abuse scandals, (some are true, most are fake).
I work for the Catholic Church so thats about all I can say.

Please pray for our One Catholic, Holy and Apostolic Church. We love Her and we love Jesus Christ.
The church needs contemplative prayers, rosaries and much more right now.
Yours in Christ.
 
MagdalenaRita said:
If I remember right in the video, she is telling the story and doesn’t add all the details and says, “to make a long story short”, which usually means there are more details not being mentioned and there are quite a few more details in the story, even more than what you added.
Click to expand...
Christine’s “to make a long story short” leaves out some important details which she fails to mention, and speculates with “They hated him there”
MagdalenaRita said:
So, if no one else and only Taylor Marshall and Christine Niles had been speculating and voiceing what they thought the reasons for the postponement were, I guess we could say there was an agenda but as I am sure you noticed when watching the video there were several others that were using the postponement to attack Bishop Fulton Sheen
Click to expand...
Here is a source showing what the issue could be…

www.ncregister.com

Sources: Rochester Bishop Requested Venerable Fulton Sheen Beatification Delay

Msgr. James Cruse of the Diocese of Peoria has confirmed that the request was made by Bishop Salvatore Matano, because of the ongoing New York attorney general’s investigation of the state’s dioceses and bishops.
www.ncregister.com www.ncregister.com

It would be better to wait and see what the issue is, rather than jumping to conclusions while making videos

Furthermore, I hope any additional examination will only further prove Sheen’s worthiness of beatification and canonization.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think what you’ve claimed is an adequate response to what people like Dr. Marshall are doing. You said it yourself that many of the abuse cases are old and most of the clergy who were responsible are dead. Yet the problem isn’t simply the abuse, but the fact that an untold number of the hierarchy covered it up.

It’s naïve to assume that those who facilitated the coverup simply died along with abusers. Think what you will about the actually number versus the false claims, but Dr. Marshall and Christine touched on a valid point with regards to McCarrick and the coverup; and the fact is it’s been over a year since this broke and nobody knows the whole story.

We’re still sitting here waiting for names to be dropped so we can find out how deep this corruption goes and nobody in the hierarchy has offered up any explanation.
 
JimmyDFG said:
It would be better to wait and see what the issue is, rather than jumping to conclusions while making videos
Click to expand...
I agree, making videos, putting out tweets and news articles should have all been held off until we got the whole story. Many Catholics and Catholic news sources all had their opinions that should have waited to be heard.

I think Dr. Marshall would have been better off had he titled his video differently, something like an interview with Christine Niles because they only discussed Fulton Sheen in about the last 1/3 of the video. The rest was mostly about Christine Niles, which I found interesting.
Catholic_JIll said:
There are so many different issues, so I’ll just outline 1 or 2 to give you an example of how twisted these stories spread.
Click to expand...
I haven’t heard too much about the Vatican bank scandal enough to comment on it. Not sure if Dr. Marshall has talked about it at all, possibly, not sure.

Sadly the sex abuse crisis has caused the Catholic church’s moral voice to be muted. It is not that it is not the moral voice for the world, it is. It is just that the sex abuse crisis has covered up that voice to many. Sadly.

I realize that many of the abusers are deceased but unfortunately it still harmed the Church because it still is something that happened and has to be dealt with for healing to happen.

I agree many claims are false and are just attacks on the Church. We just have no idea how many.

I am not real clear on what you want me to know about the names you mentioned.
Catholic_JIll said:
We need to pray A LOT!
Click to expand...
Completely agree. Our Church is in a crisis and is under attack from inside and outside. We need to stick with Her timeless teachings, pray alot and be Her witnesses.
 
Last edited:
Here’s what I would say. Unlike many today, he is honest in many regards, such as the very real battle between heaven and hell, and the influence of angels and demons over us. He is also honest as to how communion by mouth is preferred. Jesus is our Lord and Savior. He is already lowering Himself to a crappy tasting piece of bread, He does not belong in the hands of the non-consecrated, nor should a practice that allows for witches to walk away and use the Host as they please be necessarily supported, even if it is not sinful. This si something he talks about often. In this regard, I like how he is not afraid to be truthful, but there is much gossip and misinformation as well. Like with all things, be prudent enough to recognize the truth and falsehoods within them.
 
cpeters said:
He is also honest as to how communion by mouth is preferred.
Click to expand...
He honestly states his opinion, but the Church allows for reception in the hand. So when people go on and on about how their preference is the way it should be done by everyone, that is a big red flag for me. If the Church allows it, who am I to say otherwise?

And I, too, prefer to receive on the tongue.
 
I agree it isn’t wrong to receive in the hand, but it isn’t the most reverent option. In an age where I belief in the Eucharist has disemboweled parts of the Church, I simply believe prudence should be considered. I assume you share the same regards
 
Yes it is excellent and the truth is spoken. I think it’s time for Catholics to wake up. . . . We are to worship God, not mother earth or Pachamama!
 
Last edited:
Some of old Taylor Marshall videos are good where he discusses theology. But for the past 1 plus year he is too much into politics in the church and even calls (asks) Pope Francis a heretic.
I don’t watch his political shows any more…
 
JimmyDFG said:
would be better to wait and see what the issue is, rather than jumping to conclusions while making videos
Click to expand...
I did find it interesting though that Christine was just pretty accurate as to where it was coming from.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top