V
VanitasVanitatum
Guest
For the most part, small decisions like that are for the most part trivial and don’t change much of anything in society.but goodness and the betterment of society
For the most part, small decisions like that are for the most part trivial and don’t change much of anything in society.but goodness and the betterment of society
The proliferation of human acts ordered only to pleasure precede the decline of all great civilizations. Sexual perversion and hedonic eating lead the list. Societies that attempt to normalize these perversions only hasten their decline. How many food channels on your local TV? Can anyone watch a movie w/o a gratuitous sex scene anymore?Why would the acts be pleasurable then? … By what definition is that disordered?
No.Is homosexual activity a sin simply because two people of the same sex can’t conceive a child?
No, the act itself isn’t ordered to procreation. It’s not about the ability to conceive otherwise it would be sin if a sterile couple engaged in the marital act.Is homosexual activity a sin simply because two people of the same sex can’t conceive a child?
We must make a distinction between that which is by accident that that which is by nature. Some people by accident or timing cannot procreate, but that does not change the fact that particular physical act itself is designed by God as a procreative act and so it is moral.It’s not logical at all. Are you saying a man and a woman who know they cannot have children are committing a sinful act by having sex? Is a woman after menopause committing a sin when she has sex? A couple that has sex using the rhythm method (promoted by the Church) is also committing a sin?
If your reason that homosexuality is wrong is because it could never result in procreation, your position is completely illogical.
Please read the Catechism sections 2357 and. But Catholics need to stop ACTIVELY attacking and treating gays differently
The Church does not lobby against either if the action is not being asked to be performed within a Catholic ceremony or institution. If you are asking the Catholic Church to recognize a Gay marriage as valid/sacramental or that the Catholic Church cannot regulate a Catholic adoption agency based on Catholic teaching then you are violating your premise that:I would be fine with your post if you agree and acknowledge the Church and Catholics should no longer lobby against gay marriage - and ignore it just as they ignore non-Catholic marriages. I would also like your assurance that the Church and Catholics will no longer lobby against gays adopting.
I have never said I want the Church to change its internal stance on homosexuality
Are there not errors in the Bible? This would not be possible if God was the author.Scripture has God as its author.
Matthew 13: 32 says that the mustard seed is the smallest of all seeds.Please point out a few errors.
Should we burn prostitutes and stone adulterers?Please point out a few errors.
Let’s say you are a young Catholic who has found this forum and is looking for answers to her personal problem. Which is that she is gay. She hasn’t chosen go be gay. It is simply part of who she is. She is confused and not a little scared about what people might think of her. Then she comes across this thread and just in the last couple of dozen posts she reads:Are you living how you want? If so, why do you need anyone’s approval? Has any Catholic personally caused you grief and pain?
Maybe I missed it but I don’t recall anyone saying that the church should change its stance on performing sacramental marriages in the church. The church did oppose the civil recognition of marriage in the civil court. I think it still declares that a civil gay marriage is not valid whereas it doesn’t publicly call non catholic straight marriages not valid.If you are asking the Catholic Church to recognize a Gay marriage as valid/sacramental or that the Catholic Church cannot regulate a Catholic adoption agency based on Catholic teaching then you are violating your premise that: