A
Andreas_Hofer
Guest
Certainly it’s more complex. For one, the circumference of the round earth had been calculated by Eratosthenes centuries before the birth of Christ. (If you’re still working under the assumption that people at the time of Columbus thought the earth was flat, you need to do some reading. People thought he was crazy because the round earth was too big to sail west from Europe to Asia. It turns out those people were right, but luckily for Columbus he ran into an unknown land mass that saved his little endeavor.) Although Augustine still found the idea of antipodes living upside on the other side of the world laughable, he never decried it as a heresy and I don’t recall anyone ever being put to death for it.Well it’s a little more complex than that. However I’ll play your game for a bit.
At one time a long time ago: The world is flat and nobody can tell me any different. If you sail too far, you fall off the edge and die. This is the way God made it, I agree with that, and if you don’t agree with that, you are wrong and guilty of heresy and must die. Don’t try to confuse me with the facts, I know better.
Sometime later, still a long time ago: Holy Moley! Somebody just sailed to the edge and didn’t fall off. Well what do you know? Looks like God didn’t make it that way afterall. It looks the world may be round like somebody tried to tell us awhile back. Looks like we were wrong. I suppose we should’ve listened and been a little more opened minded. May be there is room for more than one train of thought. Hmm…
Pretty simplistic, huh? I believe I made my point, but it’s little more complex than this isn’t?
Furthermore, the Church doesn’t claim infallibility in matters of science, and those matters are not debated in the CCC.