Is There any Difference between Supporting Woman Privacy Right & Supporting Abortion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter francisca.chapter3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lust & selfishness is too general.
I prefer to be more specific mentioning the key word “porn”
I noticed…
Nope… Lust and Selfishness are very specific and spiritual
  • and lead to sex and Abortion of the unwanted.
Porn? Clothing? Behavior? Come Ons? “beauty”? Et Cet? Incites LUST

LUST? First mentioned of the 7 Deadly Sins?

Leads to eg., illicit sex which leads to unwanted children which leads to Abortion
 
Last edited:
I suppose, they legalize it simply because there is a need for it
There are places in the world that have legalized abortion (and porn) not because they wanted to do so, but because their countries couldn’t get loans from international banks and the IMF without doing so. If you want to see how the culture of death and lust have been spread throughout the world, I’d recommend reading Libido Dominandi by E. Michael Jones.
 
Is There any Difference between Supporting Woman Privacy Right & Supporting Abortion?

To The Catholic - There’s a Huge Gulf Between those notions…

Abortion is Murder… Thou Shalt Not Murder!

What are the God-Given “Rights” of Men and Women?
 
Somewhat of a crusade perhaps?
I simply see how porn erodes our moral standards, creating too many problems.

And it seems it is not popular to speak against it.

It is more popular to speak against abortion.
 
So… No women-only privacy rights… Ja?
I am sure there is something called “woman privacy right”. If anyone or any institution force a woman to abort her pregnancy, she should be defended her right to say no. At the same time, anyone force to use her body for anything, she should be defended against such coercion.
 
Last edited:
At the same time, anyone force to use her body for anything, she should be defended against such coercion.
I conclude from that you would oppose any law that denied a woman an abortion, not just if her circumstances were grave, but in any circumstance (Eg. Termination is desired for convenience).
 
Abortion is a surgery. It is far from convenience.
Abortion is always a difficult choice for a woman.

The accusatory tone towards woman, is the result of porn culture. It erodes society’s respect toward woman, including women to themselves.

It is like making a law to forbid the sheeps to eat meat. Well, sheeps don’t like meat. For some odd reason, it becomes a phenomenon that “sheeps seems enjoying meat”, so we illegalize “meat eating” for the sheeps, who actually love grass and hate meat. All women hate abortion, as much as a sheep finds meat yucky.

Woman are designed to carry and give birth to a child, just as much as a sheep biologically designed to eat grass.

Some women who went through abortion they show as if it is nothing because women want respect like nothing else. Something that porn rob from woman (respect). They show off as if they were strong and abortion was easy. Not true. Abortion is always hard, and go against nature.

And here is something to ponder:

Is it possible to illegalize apple, but letting apple trees grow everywhere in the city & in the country & in schools & in office culture & in every homes?
Does it matter if it is legal or illegal, if the tree is popular, and people refuse to illegalize their apple trees (porn) because it is too hard to uproot them, but they say apples (abortion) are sinful and should be illegalized.
 
Last edited:
Thou Shalt Not Murder applies to Everyone: Male and Female.
I agree.

If we prosecute abortion as murder, the woman and the clinic doctors are the criminals at the scene. However, the man is the criminal behind the scene. The mind of the crime.
 
If we prosecute abortion as murder, the woman and the clinic doctors are the criminals at the scene. However, the man is the criminal behind the scene. The mind of the crime.
He can be, but the woman can have an abortion against the will of the father.
 
The accusatory tone towards woman, is the result of porn culture. It erodes society’s respect toward woman, including women to themselves.
I have no more respect for a woman who murders her unborn child than I do for one who murders her born child.
 
Then make law that get a husband to voice his love for the woman & child and prevent her from doing it.
 
Last edited:
Then make law that get a husband to voice his love for the woman & child and prevent her from doing it.
He can tell her he loves her and the child, but she can still murder the baby if she wants to. She doesn’t even have to tell him that she’s pregnant.

Making it illegal for her to murder the child is the better option.
 
Last edited:
Making it illegal for her to murder the child is the better option.
Probably you are right.

But as long as the demand still high, what makes it impossible that it will be legalize again? By then, will the narration to legalize it would still include “woman privacy right”? Or, it would be based on mere high demand?
 
Last edited:
But as long as the demand still high, what makes it impossible that it will be legalize again?
I have no objections to addressing the reasons why women have abortions, but the right to life of the unborn should be enshrined in law even if nobody would murder them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top