E
EndTimes
Guest
I noticed… No. Lust and Selfishness is very specific…Lust & selfishness is too general. I prefer to be more specific mentioning the key word “porn” ,
I noticed… No. Lust and Selfishness is very specific…Lust & selfishness is too general. I prefer to be more specific mentioning the key word “porn” ,
I noticed…Lust & selfishness is too general.
I prefer to be more specific mentioning the key word “porn”
Yes You do! Quite a bit. Somewhat of a crusade perhaps?Lust & selfishness is too general. I prefer to be more specific mentioning the key word “porn” ,
Quite true.But I think there are other places in the world where abortion is legal, and they don’t have woman privacy right as the basis of that legal abortion.
Probably “demand” is a better choice of words.I suppose, they legalize it simply because there is a need for it
There are places in the world that have legalized abortion (and porn) not because they wanted to do so, but because their countries couldn’t get loans from international banks and the IMF without doing so. If you want to see how the culture of death and lust have been spread throughout the world, I’d recommend reading Libido Dominandi by E. Michael Jones.I suppose, they legalize it simply because there is a need for it
I simply see how porn erodes our moral standards, creating too many problems.Somewhat of a crusade perhaps?
AgreedAbortion is Murder… Thou Shalt Not Murder!
Our rights to life and to pursue happiness?What are the God-Given “Rights” of Men and Women?
So… No women-only privacy rights… Ja?Our rights to life and to pursue happiness?
I am sure there is something called “woman privacy right”. If anyone or any institution force a woman to abort her pregnancy, she should be defended her right to say no. At the same time, anyone force to use her body for anything, she should be defended against such coercion.So… No women-only privacy rights… Ja?
Whatever it may or may not be - and from whomever it may come from…I am sure there is something called “woman privacy right”
I conclude from that you would oppose any law that denied a woman an abortion, not just if her circumstances were grave, but in any circumstance (Eg. Termination is desired for convenience).At the same time, anyone force to use her body for anything, she should be defended against such coercion.
I agree.Thou Shalt Not Murder applies to Everyone: Male and Female.
He can be, but the woman can have an abortion against the will of the father.If we prosecute abortion as murder, the woman and the clinic doctors are the criminals at the scene. However, the man is the criminal behind the scene. The mind of the crime.
I have no more respect for a woman who murders her unborn child than I do for one who murders her born child.The accusatory tone towards woman, is the result of porn culture. It erodes society’s respect toward woman, including women to themselves.
He can tell her he loves her and the child, but she can still murder the baby if she wants to. She doesn’t even have to tell him that she’s pregnant.Then make law that get a husband to voice his love for the woman & child and prevent her from doing it.
Probably you are right.Making it illegal for her to murder the child is the better option.
I have no objections to addressing the reasons why women have abortions, but the right to life of the unborn should be enshrined in law even if nobody would murder them.But as long as the demand still high, what makes it impossible that it will be legalize again?